Cases

OPINION By the Court, Douglas, J.: In this opinion, we address whether a district court properly quashed a subpoena based on Nevada’s news shield statute, NRS 49.275, which protects journalists from being required to reveal information gathered in their professional capacities in the course of developing news stories. We conclude that a request for protection under NRS 49.275 may be r

*638OPINION By the Court, Saitta, J.: Parties facing a civil proceeding and a simultaneous criminal investigation often confront unpleasant choices. They may, for instance, be put to the choice of providing testimony in the civil proceeding that might be used by criminal investigators, or asserting their Fifth Amendment privilege aga

ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeal of - ) ) Aspen Consulting, LLC ) ASBCA No. 61122 ) Under Contract No. W9127S-13-C-6003 ) APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT: Gerald H. Werfel, Esq. Ian A. Cronogue, Esq.

ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeal of -- ) ) Aspen Consulting, LLC ) ASBCA No. 61122 ) Under Contract No. W9127S-13-C-6003 ) APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT: Gerald H. Werfel, Esq. Ian A. Cronogue, Esq.

************************************************ The “officially released” date that appears near the beginning of an opinion is the date the opinion will be published in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it is released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the beginning of all time periods for the filing of postopin- ion motions and petitions for certification is the “offi- cially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical cor

Case: 21-1381 Document: 40 Page: 1 Filed: 02/09/2022 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ ASPEN CONSULTING, LLC, Appellant v. SECRETARY OF THE ARMY, Appellee ______________________ 2021-1381 ______________________ Appeal from the Ar

Case: 21-1381 Document: 40 Page: 1 Filed: 02/09/2022 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ ASPEN CONSULTING, LLC, Appellant v. SECRETARY OF THE ARMY, Appellee ______________________ 2021-1381 ______________________ Appeal from the Ar

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE ASPEN PROPERTIES GROUP, LLC AS TRUSTEE FOR ASPEN _— : C.A. No. K19L-04-014 WLW G REVOCABLE TRUST, : Plaintiff, V. ESTATE OF SHEILA L. JOHNSON- : BROWN c/o RICHARD F. BROWN : Personal Representative, and RICHARD F. BROWN, Heir, Defendants. Submitted: March 2, 2020 Decided: June 18, 2020 ORDER Defendants’ Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings Denied. Catherine Di Lorenzo, Esquire and Darlene Wyatt Blythe, Esquire of Stern & Eisenberg Mid-Atlantic, P.C

OPINION & ORDER HONORABLE PAUL A. CROTTY, United States District Judge: In May 2012, Plaintiffs Aspen Specialty Insurance Company (“Aspen”) and Land*339mark American Insurance Company (“Landmark”) sold $40 million in excess flood loss coverage to Defendant 4 NYP Ventures LLC (“4 NYP”) in conjunction with Defendant’s acquisition of an

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER MARVIN E. ASPEN, District Judge: Plaintiff Jonathan Simkus brings a two-count complaint against Defendants Cavalry SPV I, LLC (SPV), and Cavalry Portfolio Services, LLC (CPS) for violations of § 1692e and § 1692f of the Fair Debt Collections Practices Act. 15 U.S.C. § 1692 et seq. (“FDCPA”). Mr. Simkus contends Defendants SPV and CPS (collectively, “Defenda

June 2, 2021 Supreme Court No. 2019-379-Appeal. (PC 19-5588) Aspen American Insurance Company : v. : East Coast Precast & Rigging LLC : et al. NOTICE: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Rh

ORDER WILEY Y. DANIEL, SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE I. INTRODUCTION THIS MATTER is before the Court on Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 70), filed on March 2, 2016. The matter arises out of allegations by Plaintiff Alvaro J. Arnal (“Arnal”), that Aspen View Condominium Association, Inc. (“AVCA” or the “Association”), and Aspen Snowmass Care, Inc., D.B.A. First Ch

571 F.Supp.2d 712 (2008) TIGER FIBERS, LLC, Atlantic Recycling Technologies, LLC, Plaintiffs, v. ASPEN SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant. Civil Action No. 1:07cv1106. United States District Court, E.D. Virginia, Alexandria Division. August 15, 2008. *713 C. Thomas Brown, Silver & Brown, Fairfax, VA, for Plaintiffs. <

66 P.3d 111 (2002) NATIONAL REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant and Cross-Appellee, v. WYSE FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.; Irvin Borenstein, individually; and Real-America Ventures, LLC, Defendants-Appellees and Cross-Appellants, and Marilyn G. Green, Public Trustee, Douglas County, Defendant. No. 01CA0799. Colorado Court of Appeals, Div. III. April 11, 2002.

594 F.Supp.2d 630 (2009) TIGER FIBERS, LLC, et al., Plaintiffs, v. ASPEN SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant. No. 1:07cv1106 (AJT/TCB). United States District Court, E.D. Virginia, Alexandria Division. January 16, 2009. *633 C. Thomas Brown, Silver & Brown, Fairfax, VA, for Plaintiffs. Christopher Abram Jones, Micha

Aspen Specialty Ins. Co. v. Nucor Corp., 2022 NCBC 19. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION MECKLENBURG COUNTY 19 CVS 19887 ASPEN SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY; ENDURANCE AMERICAN SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY; PARTNERRE IRELAND INSURANCE LTD.; HELVETIA SWISS INSURANCE COMPANY; LEXINGTON INSURANCE COMPANY; LIBERTY MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY; LIBERTY SURPLU

MATHESON, Circuit Judge. *954This case is an insurance coverage dispute between Plaintiff-Appellant Black & Veatch Corporation ("B&V") and Defendants-Appellees Aspen Insurance (UK) Ltd. and Lloyd's Syndicate 2003 (collectively, "Aspen"). The issue is whether Aspen must reimburse B&V for the costs B&V incurred due to damaged equi

USCA11 Case: 22-10740 Document: 33-1 Date Filed: 04/13/2023 Page: 1 of 22 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 22-10740 ____________________ ASPEN AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, Tessc

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE JANCO FS 2, LLC AND JANCO FS 3, ) LLC, ) ) C.A. No. N23C-03-005 MAA CCLD Plaintiffs, ) v. ) ) ISS FACILITY SERVICES, INC.; ISS ) C&S BUILDING MAINTENANCE ) CORPORATION; ISS TMC )

MEMORANDUM-DECISION and ORDER DAVID N. HURD, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiffs Carol Treiber, Leslie Taiman, Lori Slauter, Rodney Herring, Patricia Huddleston, Carl Dorsey, Irene Evers, Kathryn Hovland, Isabelle Reali, Geraldine Langford, and Troy Fulwood (collectively “plaintiffs”) bring an Amended Complaint against defendants Aspen Dental Management, Inc.