Cases

[Cite as Ohio Equity Fund for Hous. Ltd. Partnership XXVIII v. Irvin Cobb Mgr., Inc., 2025-Ohio-1714.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT Ohio Equity Fund for Housing Limited : Partnership XXVIII, : Plaintiff-Appellee, No. 24AP-375

Case: 23-60626 Document: 99-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/25/2025 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit ____________ FILED

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit ____________ FILED August 25, 2025 No. 23-60626

Abarrotes Mixteca Corp., Inc. v Brisk (2025 NY Slip Op 00034) Abarrotes Mixteca Corp., Inc. v Brisk 2025 NY Slip Op 00034 Decided on January 07, 2025 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau purs

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-18-00452-CV MGR, INC. and Miracle Body and Paint, Inc. d/b/a Miracle Body and Paint, Appellants v. GEICO CASUALTY COMPANY,

NO. 12-15-00197-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT TYLER, TEXAS MURPHY USA, INC. AND MARY § APPEAL FROM THE 123RD FRANCES MAXWELL, MGR., APPELLANTS V. § JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT FREDDIE J. ROSE AND LAUREEN IRVING, APPELLEES § SHE

ACCEPTED 12-15-00197-CV TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS TYLER, TEXAS 9/23/2015 1:06:51 PM

849 So.2d 276 (2003) WILLIS SHAW EXPRESS, INC., etc., et al., Petitioners, v. HILYER SOD, INC., Respondent. No. SC02-1521. Supreme Court of Florida. March 13, 2003. Rehearing Denied June 26, 2003. *277 John W. Frost, II and Peter W. van den Boom of Frost, Tamayo, Sessums & Aranda, P.A., Bartow, FL, for Petiti

Polar Bear Mechanical, Inc., Appellant, againstWalison Corp. and RLI Insurance Company, Respondents, and Abbey Manor Special Needs Apartments, L.P., et al., Defendants. Marshall M. Stern, Esq., for appellant. Rogers, McCarron & Habbas, P.C. (Elizabeth V. Marchionni, Esq.), for respondents. Appeals from orders of the District Court of Nassau County, First District (Ign

Oak Beverages, Inc. v D.G. Yuengling & Son, Inc. (2025 NY Slip Op 04730) Oak Beverages, Inc. v D.G. Yuengling & Son, Inc. 2025 NY Slip Op 04730 Decided on August 20, 2025 Appellate Division, Second Department Hom Published by New York State

DECISION AND ORDER WILLIAM M. SKRETNY, Chief Judge. I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Bristol Village, Inc. commenced this putative class action alleging, among other things, that Defendant Louisiana-Pacific Corporation1 breached express and implied warranties with respect to its TrimBoard product. Presently before this Court is Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss all ca

TV Tech Mgrs., Inc. v Cohen (2024 NY Slip Op 02553) TV Tech Mgrs., Inc. v Cohen 2024 NY Slip Op 02553 Decided on May 8, 2024 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law §

Houtenbos v Fordune Assn., Inc. (2021 NY Slip Op 06678) Houtenbos v Fordune Assn., Inc. 2021 NY Slip Op 06678 Decided on December 1, 2021 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting B

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE TWITTER, INC., ) ) Plaintiff and ) Counterclaim-Defendant, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2022-0613-KSJM ) ELON R. MUSK, X HOLDINGS I, ) INC., and X HOLDINGS II, INC., ) ) Defenda

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE TWITTER, INC., ) ) Plaintiff and ) Counterclaim-Defendant, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2022-0613-KSJM ) ELON R. MUSK, X HOLDINGS I, ) INC., and X HOLDINGS II, INC., ) ) Defenda

MEMORANDUM OPINION T. S. Ellis, III, United States District Judge At issue in this removed and transferred breach-of-contract and employment discrimination case is defendant’s motion to dismiss the Amended Complaint (“AC”) pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6), Fed. R. Civ. P. The AC alleges three Counts: (1) Breach of contract (on behalf of one plaintiff), (2) National origin discrimination, in violation of Montgome

MEMORANDUM BUCKWALTER, District Judge. TABLE OF CONTENTS FOR CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT TO LIABILITY I.STATEMENT OF FACTS. A. Persons Relevant to the Suit. 1. The Parties. 2. Other Relevant Individuals. B. Background of the Key Players’ Employment With Synthes 1. Defendant Marotta

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE JANCO FS 2, LLC AND JANCO FS 3, ) LLC, ) ) C.A. No. N23C-03-005 MAA CCLD Plaintiffs, ) v. ) ) ISS FACILITY SERVICES, INC.; ISS ) C&S BUILDING MAINTENANCE ) CORPORATION; ISS TMC )

176 Cal.App.4th 12 (2009) SUPERIOR DISPATCH, INC., Plaintiff and Appellant, v. INSURANCE CORPORATION OF NEW YORK, Defendant and Respondent. No. B204878. Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Three. July 30, 2009. *17 Pierry Shenoi, Allan A. Shenoi; Law Offices of Daniel J. Koes, Daniel J. Koes; Brown Shenoi Ko

FILED 15-0674 11/16/2015 2:17:39 PM tex-7866695 SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS