Cases

FAHEY, J. ***583The People contend that defendant, a level three sex offender, was required to register his Facebook account as an "internet identifier" pursuant to Correction Law § 168-f (4). That statute requires that sex offenders register with the Division of Criminal Justice Services (DCJS) "no later than ten calendar days after any change

Cynthia L. Martin, Judge David A. Hein (“Brother”) appeals a judgment that sanctioned him for discovery violations by striking his answer and affirmative defenses and that entered judgment in favor of Mary Lu Brown (“Sister”) on one of two counts in Sister’s petition seeking the discovery of assets in a probate proceeding. Brother also appeals from an order granting Sister’s mot

696 S.E.2d 101 (2010) ELLIS v. The STATE. No. A10A0315. Court of Appeals of Georgia. June 1, 2010. *102 C. Arthur Moss Jr., for appellant. Griffin E. Howell III, Solicitor-General, for appellee. PHIPPS, Presiding Judge. A jury found James Ellis III guilty of driving with an unlawful blood alcohol concentratio

117 F.Supp.2d 651 (2000) Todd A. PORTER, Plaintiff, v. Arthur E. ELLIS, Individually and in his capacity as Superintendent of Public Instruction of the Michigan Department of Education, Defendant. No. 4:00-CV-129. United States District Court, W.D. Michigan, Southern Division. October 26, 2000. Samuel T. Field, Field & Field, PC, Kalamazoo, MI, for Todd A. Porte

Affirmed by published opinion. Judge DUNCAN wrote the opinion, in which Judge SHEDD and Judge DAVIS joined. DUNCAN, Circuit Judge: Appellant Arthur Drager, as personal representative of the estate of Shirley Gross, seeks reversal of the district court’s denial of Gross’s request to amend her complaint and its dismissal of her state common law tort claims ag

State of New York OPINION Court of Appeals This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the New York Reports. No. 54 The People &c., Appellant, v. Arthur W. Ellis Jr., Respondent. Kathryn M. Moryl, for appellant. Noreen McCarthy, for respondent. FAHEY, J.: The

368 S.C. 326 (2006) 628 S.E.2d 894 Ellis ARTHUR and Barbara Arthur as Wife, next friend, and companion, Appellants, v. SEXTON DENTAL CLINIC, and Leigh Westraad and Lisa Ann Eagerton, as personal representatives of the Estate of Dr. H.L. Eagerton, Jr. and his associates A-Z; SC JUA, Respondents. No. 4103. Court of Appeals of South Carolina. Heard Septembe

736 N.E.2d 731 (2000) Adam C. ELLIS, Appellant (Defendant Below), v. STATE of Indiana, Appellee (Plaintiff Below). No. 01S00-9910-CR-632. Supreme Court of Indiana. October 18, 2000. *732 Donald C. Swanson, Jr., Fort Wayne, Indiana, Attorney for Appellant. Karen M. Freeman-Wilson, Attorney General of Indiana, Arthur Thaddeu

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA GREGORY ELLIS, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 18-1255 (JEB) JAMES N. MATTIS, in his official capacity as U.S. Secretary of Defense, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff Gregory Ellis claims that while working for the United States Navy, he was subjected to

GREENE, Judge. The defendant appeals from a judgment entered 2 May 1990 in which the trial court ordered that title to certain real property be vested in the plaintiffs. Prior to the introduction of any evidence, the parties stipulated that witnesses at trial were prohibited from testifying as to statements made by Queen Ellis (Ellis). The parties complied with this stipulation. Viewed in the light most favo

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA MICHAEL BEALS ELLIS, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 16-31 (JEB) DAVID L. JARVIS, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION It is undoubtedly true that many people would prefer not to pay taxes. Yet the great majority of us do so as the price of living in a civi

Opinion by Rodowsky, J. The Dormant Mineral Interests Act (DMIA or the Act), Maryland Code (1982, 2014 Repl. Vol.), §§ 15-1201 through 15-1206 of the Environment Article (En.) authorizes a circuit court, under specified circumstances, to terminate a dormant "severed mineral interest," thereby effecting a merger of that mineral interest with the estate overlying it. Respondents, Olin L.

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 21-3162 ARTHUR GRADY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. CHARLES TRUITT, Respondent-Appellee. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern D

33/ -/r *32-/S* 3 51-/|" 33V*/, 33wr 337"/5* ELECTRONIC RECORD 330-/5" 33^ -/T Miscellaneous/Other Criminal including Misdemeanor or COA# 10-15-00055-CR OFFENSE: Felony William Arthur Mcintosh v. The Stat e of STYLE: Texas

KENNEDY, Judge. This is a grandmother’s appeal from a judgment of the circuit court modifying, and restricting, her rights of visitation with her three grandchildren as provided in an earlier order. Grandmother also appeals from the judgment dismissing her petition for contempt against her daughter and her daughter’s husband, for their alleged contumacious violation of the order granting visitation rights

ORDER Michael P. Mills, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE, NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI This cause comes before the court on the motion of defendants, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 56, for summary judgment. Plaintiff Stella Ellis has responded in opposition to the motion, and the court, having considered the memoranda and submissions of the parties, concludes that the motion is well taken and should be granted.</

In the Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana No. 06-23-00021-CV PITTSBURG STEEL, LLC, Appellant V. ARTHUR PALMER, Appellee On Appeal from the 76th District Court Camp County, Texas Trial Court No. CV-21-03650 Before Stevens, C.J., van Cleef and Rambin, JJ. Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice Stevens

123 F.3d 1308 13 IER Cases 348, 21 Employee Benefits Cas. 1666,97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7095,97 Daily Journal D.A.R. 11,453,Pens. Plan Guide (CCH) P 23936V Fred D. CAMPBELL, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.The AEROSPACE CORPORATION; Arthur J. Schiewe, Defendants-Appellees. No. 95-56007. United States Court of Appeals,Ninth Circuit.

In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo ________________________ No. 07-18-00320-CV ________________________ HEATHER HAMILTON, APPELLANT V. ARTHUR MAESTAS, APPELLEE On A

MEMORANDUM NANGLE, Chief Judge. This matter is now before this Court on plaintiffs’ motion for class action certification pursuant to Rules 23(b)(1) and (b)(2). Fed.R.Civ.P. 23(b)(1), (b)(2). The parties submitted numerous briefs, documents and affidavits to this Court both in support of and in opposition to plaintiffs’ motion. In addition, this Court heard testimony on plaintiffs’ motion on Dece