Cases

Lavine, Beach and Bear, Js. LAVINE, BEACH and BEAR, Js. *73 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page I. FACTS...548 A. Factual and Procedural History...548 B. Issues on Appeal...553

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ON TRUSTEE’S OBJECTION TO CONFIRMATION OF CHAPTER 13 PLAN JOHN E. HOFFMAN, JR., Bankruptcy Judge. I. Introduction In her Chapter 13 plan, Erica Jane Russell proposes to pay a higher dividend to holders of cosigned consumer debts than to her other general unsecured creditors. The Chapter 13 trustee contends that this differential treatment unfairly di

Beachley, J. In this opinion, we attempt to finally resolve asbestos-related litigation stemming from complaints filed in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City more than twenty years ago. Appellants consist of plaintiffs represented by three different groups of law firms: 1) the Law Offices of Peter Angelos (“LOPA plaintiffs” or “LOPA”)

705 F.Supp.2d 696 (2010) EMPLOYERS INSURANCE CO. OF WAUSAU, Plaintiff, v. PENN-AMERICA INSURANCE CO. and Prestige Oysters Inc., Defendants. Civil Action No. G-08-0069. United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Galveston Division. March 31, 2010. *697 Catherine Love Hanna, Hanna & Plaut LLP, Austin, TX, for Plaintiff. M

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT JAMES L. ROBART, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION Before the court is Plaintiffs Absher Construction Company and Pacific Components, Inc. d/b/a Absher Pacific Joint Venture’s (collectively “Absher Pacific”) motion for summary judgment. (Mot. (Dkt. # 24).) This is an insurance coverage action, and Absher Pacific has moved for summ

LOHIER, Circuit Judge: This appeal requires us to consider whether consequential damages, which are traditionally available for breach of contract claims, are also available for a claim of breach of a duty to defend an insured under Connecticut law, and if so, whether they may include damages for harm to reputation. The defendant National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsbur

MEMORANDUM OPINION THOMAS B. RUSSELL, Senior District Judge. This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiffs motion to remand (DN 7). Defendant has responded (DN 12) and Plaintiff has replied (DN 13). This matter is now ripe for adjudication. For the reasons that follow, Plaintiffs motion is GRANTED. This case will be remanded to the Christian County Circuit Court. BACKGROUND

Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC v. AG Ins. SA/NV, 2021 NCBC 46. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION MECKLENBURG COUNTY 17 CVS 5594 DUKE ENERGY CAROLINAS, LLC and DUKE ENERGY PROGRESS, LLC, Plaintiffs, ORDER AND OPINION ON DEFENDANTS ARROWOOD’S AND v.

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 20a0092p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT DANA NESSEL, Attorney General of the State of ┐ Michigan, ex rel., The People of the State of │ Michigan, │

ESPINOSA, J., dissenting. "'Twill be recorded for a precedent, And many an error by the same example Will rush into the state." W. Shakespeare, The Merchant of Venice, act IV, sc. i. I write this dissenting opinion not to address the concurring opinion of Justice Palmer, who continues to believe that State v. Santiago,

657 S.E.2d 899 (2008) Timothy RAPER, Employee, Plaintiff, v. MANSFIELD SYSTEMS, INC. and Federated Mutual Insurance Company, Employer/Carrier, Defendants. No. COA07-681. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. March 18, 2008. Anderson Law Firm by Michael J. Anderson, Wilson, for plaintiff-appellant/appellee. Hedrick, Eatman, Gardner & Kincheloe, L.L.P., by To

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE RAUL ARMENTA JR. and ) SHANNON ARMENTA, individually ) and on behalf of their minor son, H.A., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) C.A. No.: N24C-02-051 SPL ) G/O MEDIA INC., D/B/A ) DEADSPIN,

FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit November 2, 2016 PUBLISH Elisabeth A. Shumaker Clerk of Court

In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 19-1797C (Filed: June 17, 2020) ) MOSHE AVRAM PERRY, ) RCFC 12(b)(1); RCFC 12(b)(6); Tucker ) Act claims; illegal exaction claims; Plaintiff, ) money-mandating claims; takings

481 S.E.2d 674 (1997) G.P. PUBLICATIONS, INC., and Technology Funding Secured Investors II, Plaintiffs, v. QUEBECOR PRINTING—ST. PAUL, INC., and Signal Research, Inc., Defendants. No. COA96-248. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. March 4, 1997. *676 Adams Kleemeier Hagan Hannah & Fouts, PLLC by J. Alexander S. Barrett, Green

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued February 7, 2017 Decided May 30, 2017 No. 16-7070 DEMETRA BAYLOR, APPELLANT v. MITCHELL RUBENSTEIN & ASSOCIATES, P.C., APPELLEE Consolidated with 16-7071 On Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER James O. Browning, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Plaintiffs Motion In Limine, filed November 16, 2015 (Doc. 76)(“Motion”). The Court held a hearing on December 22, 2015. The primary issues are: (i) whether the Court should exclude third-party Larry Payne’s out-of-court statements regarding his driving immediately

Motion to Compel Discovery; RCFC 26(b); Presidential Communications Privilege; Deliberative Process Privilege; Bank Examination Privilege; In Camera Review; Vaughn Index OPINION AND ORDER SWEENEY, Judge Before the court is plaintiffs’ motion to compel the production of documents currently being withheld, by defendant on the groun

MEMORANDUM OPINION CONTI, Chief Judge. I. Introduction This case is an appeal from the bankruptcy court’s order confirming the Modified Third Amended Plan of Reorganization (“plan”) of debtor Pittsburgh Corning Corporation (“Pittsburgh Corning”) and issuing an asbestos permanent channeling injunction under 11 U.S.C. § 524(g). The bankruptcy court explained the reasons for the order in an

453 B.R. 570 (2011) In re PITTSBURGH CORNING CORPORATION, Debtor. Bankruptcy No. 00-22876 (JKF). United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania. June 16, 2011. *573 Reed Smith, Pittsburgh, PA (James J. Restivo, Jr., Douglas A. Cameron, David Ziegler, Andrew Muha of counsel), for Pittsburgh Corning Corporation, debtor. Campbell