⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “ARNOLD v. 3M COMPANY”

Glenn v. 3M Companypublic domain
Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2023-04-05 · Published · cited 0×
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals Rita Joyce Glenn, individually and as personal representative of the Estate of Thomas Harold Glenn, deceased, Respondent, v. 3M Company, f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co.; Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, Individually and as Successor-In-Interest to Buffalo Pumps; Airgas USA, LLC; Aurora Pump; BW/IP Inc., a Subsidiary of Flowserve Corporation; CBS Corporation, a Delaware Corporation f/k/a Viacom, Inc., Success
Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2012-03-26 · Published · cited 9× · 814 N.W.2d 33; 2012 WL 987303; 2012 Minn. App. LEXIS 23
OPINION LARKIN, Judge. Appellant challenges the district court’s dismissal of its claims for breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing. Because the dismissal was based on the erroneous conclusion that a party may not maintain both a claim for breach of contract and a claim for breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing based on the same conduct, and because appellant st
Supreme Court of Alabama · 2026-04-24 · Published · cited 0×
Rel: April 24, 2026 Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the advance sheets of Southern Reporter. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions, Alabama Appellate Courts, 300 Dexter Avenue, Montgomery, Alabama 36104-3741 ((334) 229-0650), of any typographical or other errors, in order that corrections may be made before the opinion is printed in Southern Reporter. SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA OCTOBER TERM,
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2007-05-14 · Published · cited 5× · 513 F. Supp. 2d 322; 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 35899; 2007 WL 1468847
513 F.Supp.2d 322 (2007) BRADBURN PARENT TEACHER STORE, INC., on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated v. 3M (MINNESOTA MINING AND MANUFACTURING COMPANY). Civil Action No. 02-7676. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. May 14, 2007. *323 *324 Charles M. Jones, Jones Ost
Chesher v. 3M Co.public domain
District Court, D. South Carolina · 2017-02-13 · Published · cited 0× · 234 F. Supp. 3d 693; 2017 A.M.C. 305; 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20706; 2017 WL 569948
ORDER DAVID C. NORTON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This matter is before the court on defendant Crane Co.’s (“Crane”) motion for summary judgment. For the reasons stated below, the court denies Crane’s motion. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff James Wilson Chesher (“Chesher”), a former machinist mate and a commissioned officer in the U.S. Navy, together with his wife, plaintiff
Coene v. 3M Co.public domain
District Court, W.D. New York · 2014-09-11 · Published · cited 28× · 303 F.R.D. 32; 89 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 997; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 128150; 2014 WL 4542472
DECISION & ORDER MARIAN W. PAYSON, United States Magistrate Judge. PRELIMINARY STATEMENT Plaintiffs Robert Coene (“Coene”) and Valerie Coene have sued defendant 3M Company (“3M”) asserting a variety of state law claims sounding in products liability, breach of warranty, negligence and fraud arising out of Coene’s alleged occupational exposure to silica dust during
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995-12-28 · Published · cited 0× · 73 F.3d 366; 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 40455; 1995 WL 763047
73 F.3d 366NOTICE: Eighth Circuit Rule 28A(k) governs citation of unpublished opinions and provides that no party may cite an opinion not intended for publication unless the cases are related by identity between the parties or the causes of action. Betti SUTTON, Appellant,v.MINNESOTA MINING and MANUFACTURING COMPANY, also known as3M, Appellee. No. 95-1877WM. United States Court of
Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2021-09-01 · Published · cited 0×
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals Beverly Dale Jolly and Brenda Rice Jolly, Respondents, v. General Electric Company, et al., Defendants, Of whom Fisher Controls International LLC and Crosby Valve, LLC are the Appellants. Appellate Case No. 2017-002611 Appeal From Spartanburg County Jean Hoefer Toal, Acting Circuit Court Judge Opinion No. 5858 Heard November 2, 2020 – Filed September 1, 2021
Trademark Trial and Appeal Board · 2007-08-31 · Published · cited 0×
THIS OPINION IS A PRECEDENT OF THE TTAB Hearing: Mailed: 14 September 2006 31 August 2007 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _____ Trademark Trial and Appeal Board ______ Saint-Gobain Corporation v. 3M Company1
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2026-02-23 · Published · cited 0×
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 24-2572 ___________________________ Linda Scobee; Michael Scobee Plaintiffs - Appellants v. USAA Casualty Insurance Company
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2004-04-20 · Published · cited 18× · 364 F.3d 952; 32 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2700; 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 7550
364 F.3d 952 Brandee K. ADAMS, Individually; Jordan Adams, by and through her Natural Mother, Legal Guardian and Next Friend, Brandee K. Adams, Appellants,v.CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY, Appellee. No. 03-2213. United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. Submitted: November 20, 2003. Filed: April 20, 2004.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998-06-25 · Published · cited 0× · 146 F.3d 1241
BRORBY, Circuit Judge. The United States appeals the district court’s grant of partial summary judgment to the appellees, Telluride Co., Mountain Village Inc., and Telluride Ski Area, Inc. (collectively “Telco”), dismissing the Government’s claims for violations of the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. § 1251 et. seq, that occurred prior to October 15, 1988.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998-06-25 · Published · cited 44× · 146 F.3d 1241; 1998 Colo. J. C.A.R. 3602; 28 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 21334; 46 ERC (BNA) 1897; 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 13586
146 F.3d 1241 46 ERC 1897, 28 Envtl. L. Rep. 21,334,98 CJ C.A.R. 3602 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.TELLURIDE COMPANY, named: The Telluride Company; MountainVillage, Inc., d/b/a Telluride Mountain Village,Inc.; Telluride Ski Area, Inc.,Defendants-Appellees. No. 97-1236. United States Court of Appeals,Tenth Circuit.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997-04-21 · Published · cited 77× · 112 F.3d 306; 46 Fed. R. Serv. 1483; 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 7792; 1997 WL 189807
BRIGHT, Circuit Judge. Glen Wood sought damages after being struck by Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company’s (3M) train while crossing 3M’s tracks in his employer’s truck. The jury returned a $300,000 verdict in favor of Wood. 3M challenges the verdict and raises a variety of evidentiary issues. We affirm. BACKGROUND Glen W
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999-09-29 · Published · cited 55× · 193 F.3d 992; 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 23684; 76 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 46,155; 83 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 241; 1999 WL 767850
193 F.3d 992 (8th Cir. 1999) Mary D. Austin, Appellant,v.Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company; Jerry Jones, Appellees. No. 98-2670 United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT Submitted: July 30, 1999Filed: September 29, 1999 Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003-06-09 · Published · cited 4× · 331 F.3d 579; 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 11431; 2003 WL 21305366
WOLLMAN, Circuit Judge. The Minnesota School Boards Association Insurance Trust (the Trust) appeals the district court’s 1 denial of its motion for judgment as a matter of law following an adverse jury verdict on its breach of contract claim against Employers Insurance of Wausau (Wausau). The Trust also contends that the
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1968-07-03 · Published · cited 2× · 393 F.2d 1017; 55 C.C.P.A. 1182
RICH, Judge. This case is here on Kravig’s petition for further review, having been previously before us as reported at 362 F.2d 1015, 53 CCPA 1534, to which reference is made for background. The parties re-briefed the case in March 1968 and re-argued it on April 3, 1968. In the opinion by the late Judge
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997-12-11 · Published · cited 26× · 130 F.3d 1305; 45 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1146; 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 34599
130 F.3d 1305 45 U.S.P.Q.2d 1146 MINNESOTA MINING & MANUFACTURING COMPANY, Appellant,v.RAUH RUBBER, INC.; Gaia Enterprises, Inc.; James T. Rauh;and James Thomas, Appellees.Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company, Appellee,v.Rauh Rubber, Inc.; Gaia Enterprises, Inc.; and James T.Rauh, Appellants. Nos. 97-1018MN, 97-1019MN. United St
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995-10-11 · Published · cited 51× · 63 F.3d 694
RICHARD S. ARNOLD, Chief Judge. The District Court dismissed a breach-of-contract action brought by Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co. (3M) against Nippon Carbide Industries Co., Inc. (NCI), after finding that NCI did not have the necessary minimum contacts with Minnesota to support personal jurisdiction. For reasons set forth below, we reverse and remand for proceedings c
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1966-08-06 · Published · cited 4× · 362 F.2d 1015; 53 C.C.P.A. 1534
MARTIN, Judge. This appeal is from the decision of the Board of Patent Interferences awarding priority as to all of the four counts remaining in interference No. 92,874 to David J. Henderson, the junior party. The invention in issue relates to a machine for making decorative bows from a continuous length of