Cases

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA SOUTHERN ARIZONA HOME BUILDERS ASSOCIATION, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. TOWN OF MARANA, Defendant/Appellee. No. CV-21-0211-PR Filed January 17, 2023 Appeal from the Superior Court in Pima County The Honorable Paul E

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA JOHNSON UTILITIES, L.L.C., AN ARIZONA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, Petitioner, V. ARIZONA CORPORATION COMMISSION; TOM FORESE, BOB BURNS, ANDY TOBIN, BOYD W. D UNN AND JUSTIN O LSON, IN THEIR OFFICIAL CAPACITIES AS MEMBERS OF THE ARIZONA CORPORATION COMMISSION Respondents.

Opinion by Judge O’SCANNLAIN; Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge HURWITZ. OPINION O’SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judge: We must decide whether the Constitution permits a six-figure punitive damage award in a sexual harassment suit where the jury awarded no compensatory damages and only one dollar in nominal damages. I ASARCO is a large copper

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER BABCOCK, District Judge. This matter is before me on Defendant Southern Ute Indian Tribe’s (the “Tribe”) *1099Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction Pursuant to Fed. R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1) [Doc #16]. After considering the parties’ arguments, for the reasons below, I GRANT the motion.

May,, Judge. The State of Indiana (“State”) appeals the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Norfolk Southern Railway Company (“Norfolk”). 1 The State argues the trial court erred as a matter of law when it determined Indiana’s Blocked Crossing Statute, Indiana Code section 8-6-

798 F.Supp.2d 1023 (2011) The State of ARIZONA, DEPARTMENT OF LAW, CIVIL RIGHTS DIVISION, and Angela Aguilar, Plaintiffs, v. ASARCO, L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company, Defendant. No. CV 08-441 TUC-MWB. United States District Court, D. Arizona. July 13, 2011. *1025 Sandy Forbes of Waterfall, Economidis, Caldwell, Hansha

224 P.3d 988 (2010) ARIZONA TILE, L.L.C., an Arizona limited liability company, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Howard Steven BERGER and Cynthia Berger, husband and wife; John McCarthy, Defendants-Appellants. No. 1 CA-CV 08-0763. Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Department B. February 2, 2010. as Amended February 8, 2010.

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 22-1864 JOHN DOE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN INDIANA, Defendant-Appellee. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern

USCA4 Appeal: 23-1791 Doc: 44 Filed: 08/05/2024 Pg: 1 of 39 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 23-1791 LEE MARVIN HARRIS, SR., Plaintiff - Appellant, v. TOWN OF SOUTHERN PINES; OFFICER JASON

Opinion MANELLA, J. — In the underlying action, appellant James Bae and a corporation related to him asserted claims arising from a foreclosure sale *94 against several defendants, including respondent T.D. Service Company of Arizona. Respondent filed an unchallenged declaration of

ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANT: Curtis T. Hill, Jr., Attorney General of Indiana, Thomas M. Fisher, Solicitor General, Andrew A. Kobe, Larry D. Allen, Deputy Attorneys General, Indianapolis, Indiana ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE: Raymond A. Atkins, Hanna M. Chouest, Sidley Austin LLP, Washington, DC, Bryan H. Babb, Bradley M. Dick, Bose McKinney & Evans LLP, Indianapolis, Indiana, John C. Duffey, Heather L

Dissent by Chief Judge THOMAS OPINION IKUTA, Circuit Judge: In April 2016, Leslie Feldman and other appellants1 brought an action in district court challenging Arizona House Bill 2023 *1061(H.B. 2023), which precludes individuals who do not fall into one of several exceptions (e.g., election off

489 P.3d 735LO VIENTO BLANCO, LLC, an Arizona limited liability company

Dissent by Judge O’SCANNLAIN; Dissent by Judge BYBEE; Dissent by Judge N.R. SMITH ORDER THOMAS, Chief Judge: We granted, in a prior order, rehearing en bane in this appeal. In a separate order, filed concurrently with this opinion, -we scheduled en banc oral argument for the week o

JUSTICE BRUTINEL, opinion of the Court: ¶ 1 Mertola, LLC, sued Alberto Santos and his wife Arlene Santos (collectively, "Santos") to collect an outstanding credit-card debt. Although the credit-card agreement gave the creditor the option of declaring the debt immediately due and payable upon default, we hold that even if that option was not exercised, the cause of action to collect th

BILL H. WALMSLEY, Judge. | ¶ This dispute between appellant Southern Building Services, Inc., and the City of Fort Smith (the “City”) returns to our court. See S. Bldg. Servs., Inc. v. City of Fort Smith, 2018 Ark. App. 306, 427 S.W.3d 763 (Southern I). The issues in this appeal are (1) determining the “prevailing party” for purposes of an award of attorney

Opinion by Judge IKUTA; Dissent by Chief Judge KOZINSKI. OPINION IKUTA, Circuit Judge: Proposition 200 requires prospective voters in Arizona to present documentary proof of citizenship in order to register to vote, Ariz.Rev.Stat. §§ 16-152,16-166, and requires registered voters to present proof of identification in order to cast a ballot at the polls, Ariz.Rev.Stat. § 16-579. This

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA In Re: Appeal of Prospect Crozer LLC : from the Decision of the Board of : Assessment Appeals of Delaware : County, PA : Nos. 1596 – 1599 C.D. 2019 : Nos. 1600 – 1629 C.D. 2019 Appeal of: Prospect Crozer LLC : Argued: March 10, 2022 BEFORE: HONORABLE PATRICIA A. McCULLOUGH,

Judgment rendered November 20, 2024. Application for rehearing may be filed within the delay allowed by Art. 2166, La. C.C.P. No. 55,928-CA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA ***** SEAN VAN BUREN Plaintiff-Appe

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT ARIZONA ALLIANCE FOR No. 22-16490 RETIRED AMERICANS; VOTO LATINO; PRIORITIES USA, D.C. No. 2:22-cv-01374- Plaintiffs-Appellees, GMS v. OPINION KRISTIN K. MAYES, in his official capacity as Attorney General for the State of Arizona, Defend