Cases

528 F.3d 42 (2008) Thomas COOK; Megan Dresch; Laura Galaburda; Jack Glover; David Hall; Monica Hill; Jenny Lynn Kopfstein; Jennifer McGinn; Justin Peacock; Derek Sparks; Stacy Vasquez, Plaintiffs, Appellants, James E. Pietrangelo, II, Plaintiff, v. Robert M. GATES[*], Secretary of Defense; Michael Chertoff, Secretary of Homeland Security; United States of America, Defendants, Appellees. Nos. 06-2313, 06-2381.<

WILSON, Circuit Judge: This case requires us to interpret the non-waiver provision of the Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act of 1994 (USERRA) as it relates to the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) and enforcement of an arbitration agreement with terms purportedly in conflict with USERRA. USERRA provides statutory protection to members of the military against discrimination by employers because of their m

WEIMER, Justice. | ,We granted certiorari in this case to consider whether La. R.S. 23:1203.1 applies to a dispute arising out of a request for medical treatment where the request for treatment was submitted after the effective date of the statute and the medical treatment schedule, but the compensable accident and injury that necessitated the request occurred prior to that date. Both the Office of Workers’ Compensation (OWC

Affirmed by published opinion. Judge GREGORY wrote the opinion, in which Judge AGEE and Judge DIAZ joined. GREGORY, Circuit Judge: On August 15, 2013, a jury awarded Donna Cisson $250,000 in compensatory damages on a design defect and failure to warn claim against C.R. Bard, Inc. (“Bard”), and awarded an additional $1,750,000 in punitive damages. The puniti

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 14-1641 TEREZ COOK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ANTHONY O’NEILL and TODD BALDWIN, Defendants-Appellees. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the

MEMORANDUM ** William Dean Cook appeals from the 21-month sentence imposed, upon remand, following his conviction for aiding and abetting tax evasion, in violation of 26 U.S.C. § 7201 and 18 U.S.C. § 2. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. Cook contends that the district court clearly erred when it denied his request for a four-level minimal role adjustment.

PER CURIAM. The petitioner is a plaintiff in a medical malpractice action. He seeks review of a trial court order that compelled production of medical records. He argues that the records are protected by section 397.501, Florida Statutes (2002). We agree, grant the petition, issue the writ, and quash the order compelling production. The petitioner is, a physician, who sued the defendants for malpractic

Judge POOLER concurs in part and dissents in part in a separate opinion. McLAUGHLIN, Circuit Judge: This is the latest chapter in the “golden-handshake” extended to certain employees when defendant Pfizer Inc.’s (“Pfizer”) Groton, Connecticut plant (the “Groton Plant”) downsized. We are compelled to interpret the enigmatic — almost chimerical — statute of limitations that applies to actions for breach of fid

EZELL, Judge. 17 Johnny Brumfield appeals a judgment from the Office of Workers’ Compensation which denied him permanent and total disability benefits. For the following reasons, we affirm. FACTS Mr. Brumfield was injured in 1994 while working for Anthony Timberlands, Inc. He was attempting to clean a piece of equipment at the mill when his right hand got caught in the motor. Ultimatel

232 F.3d 736 (9th Cir. 2000) WADE B. COOK, an individual, Plaintiff-Appellant Cross-Appellee,v.ANTHONY ROBBINS, an individual; ROBBINS RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, JET INC., a Nevada corporation; and HARLES MELLON, an individual, Defendants-Appellees Cross-Appellants. Nos. 98-36242 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT Filed Nov.16, 2000.

ORDER The parties having jointly informed the court that this action has been settled, the opinion, filed on November 16, 2000, in Cook v. Robbins, 232 F.3d 736 (9th Cir. 2000), is WITHDRAWN and this appeal is DISMISSED. See Independent Union of Flight Attendants v. Pan American World Airways, 966 F.2d 457, 459 (9th Cir.1992) (holding that appeal should be dismissed when it becomes moot prior to issuance of mandate).

[Cite as State v. Cook, 2025-Ohio-2776.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA STATE OF OHIO, : Plaintiff- Appellee, : No. 114609 v. : DAKAREE COOK, :

SCHAFER, Judge. {¶ 1} Defendant-Appellant, Thomas B. Cook, appeals the January 4, 2017 judgment of the Summit County Court of Common Pleas, Domestic Relations Division, denying his motion to terminate the division of property order entered June 9, 2006. We affirm. I. {¶ 2} Thomas Cook ("Husband") and Tami Cook ("Wife") married on March 30, 199

WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge. In this case, we are presented with former participants in a drug conspiracy who raise a myriad of challenges to their convictions and sentences. We affirm in all respects except we remand for the resen-tencing of two defendants because the district court erred by applying U.S.S.G. § 2Dl.l(d)(l), the drug offense murder cross reference, to their sentence

MEMORANDUM OBERDORFER, District Judge. Plaintiff David Kersh filed this complaint on August 7, 1995, alleging violations of his civil rights by 42 defendants, including, inter alia, the officers and lawyers of Huntington Bank of Michigan,1 federal district and court of appeals’ judges, court personnel, and various law enforcement officials. Plaintiffs complain

[Cite as State v. Cook, 2021-Ohio-3841.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO STATE OF OHIO, : APPEAL NOS. C-210142 C-210143 Plaintiff-Appellee, : C-210144 TRIAL NOS. 20CRB-13263 A-C

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS No. 01-944 LARRY A. PELEGRINI, APPELLANT , v. ANTHONY J. PRINCIPI, SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, APPELLEE. On Appeal from the Board of Veterans' Appeals and On Appellee's Motion for Reconsideration

ORDER PER CURIAM. Defendant Doctor appeals a jury verdict for Plaintiff in the amount of $100,000 in a suit for personal injuries resulting from Doctor’s medical treatment. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the trial court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would serve no prece-dential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth t

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 23-3407 ASLI BAZ, Petitioner-Appellee, v. ANTHONY PATTERSON, Respondent-Appellant. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern Di

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 24a0101p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ ANTHONY MATTERA; BRAD KENT; WILLIAM ADAMS; │ MARK DAVIS; MATT MILLIGAN; ST