Cases

ORDER DAVID R. HERNDON, Chief Judge. I. INTRODUCTION Both of the above captioned cases are multi-plaintiff actions originally brought in California State Court against various Bayer entities (collectively, the “Bayer Defendants”) (all non-California citizens), and McKesson Corporation (“McKesson”) (a *848citizen of California an

DAVIS, District Judge. These matters are before the Court upon the Plaintiffs’ motions for relief from parts 1(A) and 1(B) of PTO No. 114, which require that Plaintiffs submit either a case-specific expert report from a medical expert attesting that Baycol caused the plaintiff injury or a letter and supporting documents, followed by a case-specific expert report, that identifies and highlights the medical records, samples

RADER, Circuit Judge, concurring. Because the alleged best mode in this case was an intermediate, not the claimed invention, the district court correctly concluded that the best mode requirement “does not compel disclosure of the unclaimed method.” Bayer AG, 129 F.Supp.2d at 721. On this basis, I would affirm. I write to underscore the district court’s correct application of the statutory test

129 F.Supp.2d 705 (2001) BAYER AG and Bayer Corp., Plaintiffs, v. SCHEIN PHARMACEUTICAL, INC., Danbury Pharmacal, Inc., and Reddy-Cheminor, Inc., Defendants/Counter-claimants. Bayer AG and Bayer Corp., Plaintiffs, v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc., and Mylan Laboratories Inc., Defendants/Counter-claimants. Civ. No. 99-2181(GEB). United States District Court, D. New Jersey.

BYE, Circuit Judge. Mikeo Townsend sued Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals (Bayer) alleging Bayer wrongfully terminated him in violation of the whistleblower protection provisions of the False Claims Act (FCA), 31 U.S.C. § 3730(h). A jury awarded Townsend $321,373 in back pay, doubled to $642,746 pursuant to the FCA, and $568,000 in emotional distress damages for a total recovery

FILED UNDER SEAL MEMORANDUM OPINION STARK, United States District Judge: Bayer Pharma AG, Bayer Intellectual Property GmbH, and Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc. (collectively, “Bayer” or “Plaintiffs”) allege that Watson Laboratories, Inc. (“Watson” or “Defendant”) infringes United States Patent No. 8,071,577 (“the ’577 patent” or “the patent-in-suit”). (D.I. 1) The ’577 patent rel

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION ANTHONY J. BATTAGLIA, District Judge. Presently before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Motion for Class Certification. (Doc. 73.) For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS the motion. I. BACKGROUND David Johns and Marc Bordman (“Plaintiffs”) seek to certify a California class for the Unfa

OPINION This is a tort action in which three defendants caused an automobile accident, one by negligently driving the car, the other two by negligently entrusting the car to the unlicensed driver. A jury found all three liable to plaintiff and allocated fault among the three defendants, and the trial court, in entering judgment on the verdict, made the driver jointly and severally liable for the entire judgment (noneconomic as well as economic damages), finding that Pr

FINAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE ORDER EDWARD M. CHEN, District Judge. A Final Pretrial Conference was held in this matter on September 20, 2011. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16(e), this order memorializes the Court’s rulings and/or the parties’ stipulations. Aso attached are the Court’s standing Guidelines for Trial. I. TRIAL DATE & LENGTH OF TRIAL

995 So.2d 639 (2008) Philip BAYER, John Patrick Blancaneaux, William H. Couret, III, Vanessa Harvey, Tamara Lang and Hayward Bush v. OMNI HOTELS MANAGEMENT CORPORATION, Omni Royal Crescent Corporation, 535 Gravier, L.L.C., Decatur Hotels, LLC As Successor to Decatur Hotel Corporation, William G. Sherrer and Gerard Vitrano. No. 2007-CA-0866. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit.

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2023-CA-00216-COA MARQUES ANTHONY TURNER APPELLANT v. TAQUANDA W. TURNER APPELLEE DATE OF JUDGMENT: 01/11/2023 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. RODNEY PURVIS FAVER COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: LOWNDES COUNTY CHANCERY COURT ATTORNEY F

KANNE, Circuit Judge. The plaintiff-appellant, Anthony J. Am-endola, alleged that the defendant-appellee, Gary R. Bayer, breached an oral agreement between them and breached his fiduciary duty to Amendola when Bayer abandoned a group attempting to buy out a company. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of Bayer. We affirm. I.

301 F.3d 1306 BAYER AG and Bayer Corporation, Plaintiffs/Counterclaim Defendants-Appellees,v.SCHEIN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., Danbury Pharmacal, Inc., and Reddy-Cheminor, Inc., Defendants/Counterclaimants-Appellants, andMylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc., and Mylan Laboratories Inc., Defendants/Counterclaimants-Appellants. No. 01-1286. No. 01-1287. United States Court of

HOWE, Justice: INTRODUCTION ¶ 1 Plaintiffs Leslie Alder, aka Leslie Roberts, and Jackie Jones (Technicians), former radiography technicians at LDS Hospital in Salt Lake City, Utah, brought this action against defendant Bayer Corporation’s AGFA division, alleging illness from chemical exposure caused by AGFA’S negligent installation and servicing of its x-ray processing machine. The trial court excluded Te

Opinion issued March 23, 2023 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-22-00650-CV ——————————— RYAN MARINE SERVICES, INC. AND TRIONICS, LLC, Appellants V. ANTHONY HOFFMAN, AS THE PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF RAYMOND

123 N.H. 780 (1983) DAVID M. BAYER & a., EXECUTORS AND CO-TRUSTEES OF THE ESTATE OF CHARLES BAYER v. SAM BAYER & a. No. 82-523. Supreme Court of New Hampshire. August 31, 1983. *781 Baker & Hayes, of Lebanon (William A. Baker on the brief and orally), for the plaintiffs. Devine, Millimet, Stahl

574 N.W.2d 667 (1998) In the Matter of the ESTATE OF Luella BAYER, Deceased. Joan BECKER, Lois Taphorn, Betty Huegerich, Tim Hackfort, Jenna Hackfort, Colleen Steffes, Doreen Stueve, Mary Pluckhahn, Nancy Gach, Bob Hackfort, John Hackfort, Dan Hackfort, Karen Kerkhoff, David Hackfort, and Bill Hackfort, Appellants, v. Larry SCHENKELBERG, Individually and as Executor of the Estate of Luella Bayer; Gerald Tigges, Mary Kay Tigges, Individually;

701 F.Supp.2d 356 (2010) In re BAYER CORP. COMBINATION ASPIRIN PRODUCTS MARKETING AND SALES PRACTICES LITIGATION. No. 09 Md.2023(BMC)(JMA). United States District Court, E.D. New York. March 30, 2010. *361 Andres F. Alonso, David Bruce Krangle, Jerrold S. Parker, Parker & Waichman, Great Neck, NY, Daniel E. Becnel, Jr., Becnel Law Fi

AGEE, Circuit Judge, dissenting: We typically tread lightly when reviewing a class certification decision, affording “substantial deference” to the district court, especially when it provides “well-supported factual findings.” Ward v. Dixie Nat’l Life Ins. Co., 595 F.3d 164, 179 (4th Cir.2010). Class certification proceedings often call for fact-intensive choices requiring intimate knowledge of the pecu

SMITH, Circuit Judge. Grace Gillis brought suit against The Principia Corporation, doing business as *868 Principia College (“Principia”), asserting (1) breach of contract, (2) intentional infliction of emotional distress (IIED), (3) negligent infliction of emotional distress (NIED), and (4)' neglig