⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “ANNETTE D. PUGH”

State v. Pughpublic domain
Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2009-05-27 · Published · cited 6× · 12 So. 3d 1085; 2009 La. App. LEXIS 1009; 2009 WL 1459569
12 So.3d 1085 (2009) STATE of Louisiana, Appellee v. David PUGH, Jr., Appellant. No. 44,251-KA. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Second Circuit. May 27, 2009. Louisiana Appellate Project by Annette Fuller Roach, for Appellant. Charles Rex Scott, II, District Attorney, Tommy Jan Johnson, Brady D. O'Callaghan, Assistant District Attorneys, for Appellee. Bef
Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2022-06-29 · Published · cited 0×
06/29/2022 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE March 29, 2022 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. LESA ANNETTE WHITE MCCULLOCH Appeal from the Criminal Court for Monroe County No. 16-010CRM Sandra N.C. Donaghy, Judge No. E2021-00404-CCA-R3-CD
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) · 2007-07-12 · Published · cited 48× · 243 S.W.3d 84; 2007 Tex. App. LEXIS 5454; 2007 WL 2005063
243 S.W.3d 84 (2007) Ronald PUGH and Betty Pugh, Appellants, v. GENERAL TERRAZZO SUPPLIES, INC., Appellee. No. 01-06-00449-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Houston (1st Dist.). July 12, 2007. *86 Bradford W. Irelan, Irelan & Hargis, P.L.L.C., Robert Alan York, Misty Annette Hataway-Cone', Godwin Pappas Langley Ronquillo, LLP, H
District Court, M.D. Alabama · 2001-11-15 · Published · cited 1× · 179 F. Supp. 2d 1371; 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22043; 2001 WL 1697118
179 F.Supp.2d 1371 (2001) EMPLOYER'S REINSURANCE CORP., Plaintiff, v. Larry DILLON, et al., Defendants. No. CIV.A. 01-D-406-N. United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Northern Division. November 15, 2001. Annette Talley Phebus, Gaines Wolter & Kinney, Daniel S. Wolter, Gaines Wolter & Kinney, Birmingham, AL, for Plaintiff. Steven F. Casey, Balch &
State v. Pughpublic domain
Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980-08-05 · Published · cited 2× · 268 S.E.2d 242; 48 N.C. App. 175; 1980 N.C. App. LEXIS 3218
268 S.E.2d 242 (1980) 48 N.C. App. 175 STATE of North Carolina v. Annette Johnson PUGH. No. 806SC11. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. August 5, 1980. *243 Gillam, Gillam & Smith by Lloyd C. Smith, Jr., Windson, for defendant-appellant. Atty. Gen. Rufus L. Edmisten by Asst. Atty. Gen. George W
Felty v. Feltypublic domain
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009-07-14 · Published · cited 3× · 66 A.D.2d 64; 882 N.Y.S.2d 504
OPINION OF THE COURT Helen, J. The principal issue on this appeal is whether, in this child custody proceeding, New York should exercise home-state jurisdiction. Although the mother in this case had moved the parties’ two children from the Commonwealth of Kentucky to the State of New York six months prior to the commencement of this custody proceeding, she allowed the children to vacation with their fathe
Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2006-03-10 · Published · cited 0× · 924 So. 2d 492; 2006 La. App. LEXIS 518; 2006 WL 572132
WILLIAMS, Judge. hThe defendant, Eaton Corporation (“Eaton”) appeals a judgment denying its exception of prescription as to the claims of plaintiffs, George Pickett, Thaud Kier-*495bow, Wilbur Shoemake, Jr. and Herman James. The district court found that because Webster Parish was a parish of proper venue as to Eaton at the time plaintiffs filed suit, their claims had
State v. Nhia Leepublic domain
Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2022-05-24 · Published · cited 4× · 401 Wis. 2d 593; 973 N.W.2d 764; 2022 WI 32
2022 WI 32 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2019AP221-CR COMPLETE TITLE: State of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Nhia Lee, Defendant-Appellant-Petitioner. REVIEW OF DECISION OF THE COURT OF APPEALS
Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2014-04-22 · Published · cited 8× · 234 Ariz. 442; 323 P.3d 725; 685 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 18; 2014 WL 1598022; 2014 Ariz. App. LEXIS 69
OPINION JOHNSEN, Judge. ¶ 1 After a nine-day hearing, an arbitrator concluded the assets in a series of brokerage accounts were community property, and the superior court adopted that conclusion in a decree of dissolution. On appeal, Husband argues the parties’ arbitration agreement requires this court to review the legal and factual mer
Warner v. Statepublic domain
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 2006-09-26 · Published · cited 141× · 2006 OK CR 40; 144 P.3d 838; 2006 WL 2788641
144 P.3d 838 (2006) 2006 OK CR 40 Charles Frederick WARNER, Appellant v. STATE of Oklahoma, Appellee. No. D-2003-829. Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma. September 26, 2006. Tamra Spradlin, Gina Walker, Assistant Public Defenders, Oklahoma City, OK, Counsel for Appellant at Trial. Wesley Lane, District Attorney, Lou Keel, Robert Swa
District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2011-03-23 · Published · cited 46× · 803 F. Supp. 2d 892; 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 30697; 2011 WL 1113192
Memorandum Opinion and Order GARY FEINERMAN, District Judge. Plaintiffs Patrick McQueen, Gail Russell, Michelle Shumaker, and Sharon Dancy, aviation police officers employed by the City of Chicago’s Department of Aviation (“DOA”), brought suit against several current and former DOA supervisors and the City of Chicago. Plaintiffs’ second amended complaint (Doc. 71) alleges the denial of equal employment oppor
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003-01-08 · Published · cited 0× · 314 F.3d 1367; 171 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2837; 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 232
314 F.3d 1367 Kimberly ADAMS, Dale Anderson, Jr., Kenneth Baalman, Patricia C. Ball, Debbie Barkman, Celeste B. Berry, Debra Billings, Linda Bland, Monica A. Boyd, Anita Brewster, Trenace R. Brown, George Burkel, Annette Brown-Burnett, Victoria R. Carthen, Jimmy Chan, Kathy Collier, Paul D. Collier, Racheal Collins, Joyce Dunlap, Elizabeth L. Eaglin, Maggie L. Ester, Juanita Esters, Kathleen Flynn, Carolyn Ford, Richard L. Frierdich, Jr., Michael G
District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2009-06-17 · Published · cited 2× · 649 F. Supp. 2d 861; 47 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1099; 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 50684; 2009 WL 1708097
649 F.Supp.2d 861 (2009) Stephen G. LINGIS, Donald L. Smith and Peter D. White, on behalf of Themselves and a Class of Person Similarly Situated, Plaintiffs-Intervenors, v. MOTOROLA, INC., David Devonshire, the Profit Sharing Committee of Motorola, Inc., Rick Dorazil, Christopher B. Galvin, Robert L. Growney, Ronnie C. Chan, H. Laurance Fuller, Anne P. Jones, Donald R. Jones, Judy C. Lewent, Walter E. Massey, Nicholas Negroponte, John E. Pepper,
In Re Basspublic domain
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 1998-10-30 · Published · cited 10× · 227 B.R. 103; 41 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 23; 1998 Bankr. LEXIS 1469; 1998 WL 801785
227 B.R. 103 (1998) In re Pecolia BASS, Danzerine Patterson, Derrick & Dawnette Purcell, Timothy Jackson, Sr., Jannette Hilton, Ricky & Linda Redrick, Charles Ramsey, Roberto Torre-Arroyo, Michael Peltier, Cherie Kirby, Robert & Marie Daugherty, Anthony & Tanya Early, Terry Terrell, Quintin Harper, Gerald Bowser, Ralph & Paula Ryan, Maggie Green, Melvin & Cynthia Kile, Emily Polk, Keith Underwood, Velma Lyons, Christopher & Ju
People v. Nicholaspublic domain
Illinois Supreme Court · 2006-01-23 · Published · cited 262× · 842 N.E.2d 674; 218 Ill. 2d 104; 299 Ill. Dec. 637; 2006 Ill. LEXIS 308
842 N.E.2d 674 (2005) 218 Ill.2d 104 299 Ill.Dec. 637 The PEOPLE of the State of Illinois, Appellant, v. Marcel NICHOLAS, Appellee. No. 98965. Supreme Court of Illinois. December 1, 2005. As Modified Upon Denial of Rehearing January 23, 2006. *676 Lisa Madigan, Atto
Parus v. Catorpublic domain
District Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2005-11-14 · Published · cited 0× · 399 F. Supp. 2d 912; 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27921; 2005 WL 3046509
399 F.Supp.2d 912 (2005) William A. PARUS, Plaintiff, and GERMANTOWN MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Intervening Plaintiff, v. Andrew C. Cator, Thomas Kroeplin, Dawn Bresnahan, individually and in her official capacity as an employee of the Town of Minocqua Police Department, Town of Minocqua, Wisconsin, Clay Kreitlow, individually and in his capacity as an employee of the Town of Woodruff Police Department, and Town of Woodruff, Wisconsin, Defenda
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2006-11-28 · Published · cited 18× · 470 F.3d 1325; 98 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 7903; 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 29218; 2006 WL 3409793
BIRCH, Circuit Judge: In this appeal, we must decide whether certain monetary transfers from one Internal Revenue Code Subchapter S corporation (“Scorporation”) to two other S corporations constituted bona fide loans, and, if so, whether those loans were effectively discharged, thereby resulting in cancellation of indebtedness income to the borrower corpora
People v. Ruizpublic domain
Appellate Court of Illinois · 2003-08-05 · Published · cited 25× · 795 N.E.2d 912; 342 Ill. App. 3d 750; 277 Ill. Dec. 244; 2003 Ill. App. LEXIS 1003
795 N.E.2d 912 (2003) 342 Ill. App.3d 750 277 Ill.Dec. 244 The PEOPLE of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Israel RUIZ, Defendant-Appellant. No. 1-00-2509. Appellate Court of Illinois, First District, Second Division. August 5, 2003. *915 Office of the State Appellate De
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002-02-28 · Published · cited 42× · 283 F.3d 1258; 89 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 1251; 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 3165
283 F.3d 1258 J.C. SHEPHERD, Petitioner-Appellant,v.COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent-Appellee. No. 01-12250. United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit. February 28, 2002. James M. Kane, Charles E. Hodges, II, David DeCoursey Aughtry, Chamberlain, Hrdlicka, White, Williams & Martin, Atlanta,
District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2013-01-29 · Published · cited 3× · 920 F. Supp. 2d 881; 2013 WL 329042; 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11881
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER1 SIDNEY I. SCHENKIER, United States Magistrate Judge. This matter is before the Court upon the motion of the post-Supplemental Relief Order Complaint Administrator, Mark Vogel, to compel the testimony of Doris Gershon (“Motion to Compel”) (doc. # 3036). For the reasons set forth below, the Court grants the Motion to Compel.