Cases

ORDER ELIASON, United States Magistrate Judge. A non-party, the Law Firm of Blanco Tackabery Combs & Matamoros P.A. (“BTCM Firm”), has filed a motion for a court order awarding it reimbursement expenses incurred in connection with complying with a subpoena issued by defendant Kelly. A brief background of the underlying litigation will be helpful in order to understand the issues before the Cou

336 F.Supp.2d 540 (2004) Don G. ANGELL; D. Gray Angell, Jr. and Don R. House, in their capacities as Co-Trustees of the Don Angell Irrevocable Trust Under Instrument Dated July 24, 1992; and Angell Care Incorporated, Plaintiffs, v. Elizabeth B. KELLY, C. Taylor Pickett, Daniel J. Booth, and Ronald L. Lord, Defendants. No. 1:01 CV 00435. United States District Court, M.D. North Carolina.

113 P.3d 988 (2005) 200 Or. App. 244 STATE of Oregon, Respondent, v. Kelly Brian ANGELL, Appellant. 0208-34836; A121081. Court of Appeals of Oregon. Argued and Submitted December 23, 2004. Decided June 15, 2005. Peter A. Ozanne, Executive Director, Peter Gartlan, Chief Defender, and Jamesa J. Drake, Deputy Public Defender, Of

STROUD, Judge. Reginald Brown Kelly (“defendant”) appeals from an order denying his motion to modify alimony. Defendant argues on appeal that several of the trial court’s findings are not supported by the evidence and that the findings are insufficient to support the trial court’s conclusion that there has been no substantial change of circumstances since the initial alimony order was entered. We affirm.

WAVERLY D. CRENSHAW, JR., CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE In this diversity action brought by Roger and Kerry Finley, Robyn Kelly1 has filed a Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint (Doc. No. 18). That Motion has been fully briefed by the parties (Doc. Nos. 19, 22 & 23), and, for the following reasons, will be granted in part and denied in part. Also pending is a Motion to Dismiss f

Justice KAGAN delivered the opinion of the Court. *1568 For four days in September 2013, traffic ground to a halt in Fort Lee, New Jersey. The cause was an unannounced realignment of 12 toll lanes leading to the George Washington Bridge, an entryway into Manhattan administered by the Port

STEPHENS, Judge. Factual and Procedural Background This appeal arises from a loan made in February 2004 by Lokie Garland Martin to William Cheshire Lee in the amount of $100,000.00. Lee planned to use the money to open a new business which would sell cigars and other tobacco products from a store located in Cary. Lee repaid $500.00 to Martin almost immediately after receiving the loan, and, on 18 February 20

935 A.2d 943 (2007) Dennis ANGELL v. The UNION FIRE DISTRICT OF SOUTH KINGSTOWN, et al. No. 2006-313-Appeal. Supreme Court of Rhode Island. December 6, 2007. *944 Kelly M. Fracassa, Westerly, Esq., for Plaintiff. Peter E. Garvey, Esq., Providence, for Defendant. Present: WILLIAMS, C.J., GOLDBERG, FLAHERTY, SUTTELL,

Hon. Roger T. Benitez, United States District Judge On February 21, 2017, Plaintiff Frank S. Cammarata, d/b/a/ Cammarata Associates, as successor to MHP II Corporation ("Plaintiff" or "Cammarata"), filed this diversity action for declaratory relief and monetary damages against Defendants Kelly Capital, LLC, Kelly Escrow Fund V, LLC, and Michael R. Kelly. (Docket No. 1.) On December 18, 2017, Defendants filed the instant motion for s

OPINION CALLAHAN, Circuit Judge: The influx of detainees in the Tucson Sector of the U.S. Border Patrol in 2015 resulted in Defendants (federal government officials and agents) holding detainees being processed for longer periods of time in overcrowded and unsanitary cells at eight different stations. Plaintiffs brought t

Hon M. James Lorenz, United States District Judge Pending before the Court is Defendant Wal Mart Stores, Inc.'s ("Walmart") motion for summary judgment. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1(d)(1), the Court decides the matter on the papers submitted and without oral argument. For the reasons stated below, the Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART Walmart's motion. I. BACKG

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS’ CONSOLIDATED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT WITH LEAVE TO AMEND SUSAN ILLSTON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Now before the Court is defendants’ motion to dismiss plaintiffs’ Consolidated *1063Class Action Complaint. For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS defendants’ motion to dismiss,

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-22-00346-CV In re Darbie Angell Fink ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM WILLIAMSON COUNTY MEMORANDUM OPINION Relator has filed a petition for writ of mandamus complaining of temporary orders rendered by the trial court on September 30, 2021, and signed six months later on April 7, 2022. Relator spec

515 F.3d 149 (2008) Angel DIAZ, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Walter KELLY, Superintendent of Attica Correctional, Respondent-Appellee. Yoke Yew Tan, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Floyd G. Bennett, Superintendent, Elmira Correctional Facility, Respondent-Appellee. Warren Taylor, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Gary F. Hodges, Respondent-Appellee. Docket Nos. 01-2687-pr, 01-2736-pr, 02-2037-pr. U

MEMORANDUM ** California state prisoner G. Daniel Walker appeals pro se from the district court’s summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging defendants conspired to deprive him of access to the courts by transferring him back to California without his legal materials. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, Taylor v. List, 880 F.2d 1040, 1044 (9th Cir.1989), and

OPINION TROTT, Circuit Judge: Petitioner Prentiss Griffin, a member of the Grape Street Crips gang, was convicted by jury in the Superior Court of Los Angeles County of the first degree murder of Dwin Brooks, a member of a rival gang, the Bounty Hunter Bloods. The jury acquitted him of shooting Waylon Walton, who was shot but not killed during the same enco

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER RODNEY GILSTRAP, District Judge Before the Court is the Motion to Decertify Collective of Salaried Account Managers filed by the Defendant Healthcare Services Group (HSG) (Dkt. No. 235, “Mot.”). The Plaintiffs oppose the Motion (Dkt. No. 243, “Resp.”). For the reasons set forth below, the Motion is DENIED. OVERVIEW OF MOTION This

RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 17a0016p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT KELLY SERVICES, INC.; KELLY PROPERTIES, LLC, ┐ Plaintiffs-Appellees, │ │

ORDER JAMES E. GRITZNER, District Judge. Now before the Court is a Motion to Certify Class, a Motion for Final Approval of Settlement, and an Unopposed Motion for Approval of Attorneys’ Fees, Service Awards, and Reimbursement of Expenses filed by Plaintiff Sean Kelly (Kelly) on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated. Defendant Phiten USA, Inc. (Phiten or Defendant), has not resisted these moti

MEMORANDUM ** Michael Sean Kelly appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 70-month sentence for bank robbery, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Kelly’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided the appellant with t