Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “ANA MARIA SANTIAGO ROBLES”
Vazquez-Robles v. Commoloco, Inc.public domain
OPINION AND ORDER BESOSA, District Judge. Maribel Vazquez-Robles (“Vazquez”) brought suit against her former employer, CommoLoCo, Inc. (“CommoLoCo”), alleging that CommoLoCo discriminated against her on the basis of her disability, in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”) and Puerto Rico Law 44; retaliated against her in violation of the ADA, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Tit
Walsh v. Popular, Inc.public domain
OPINION & ORDER AIDA M. DELGADO-COLÓN, Chief Judge. I. Factual and Procedural Background The instant action involves claims for alleged violations of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended, 29 U.S.C. §§ 1101 et seq. (“ERISA”), with respect to the Popular, Inc. Puerto Rico Savings and Investment Plan (the “PR Plan”) and the Popular, Inc.
Campaign for Quality Educ. v. Statepublic domain
Jenkins, J. In these consolidated appeals, appellants ask us to reinstate their claims in which they seek declaratory and injunctive relief on the ground that respondents are allegedly violating sections 1 and *8925 of article IX of the California Constitution.1 Appellants' claims are general in nature. They alleg
Filed 4/20/16 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE CAMPAIGN FOR QUALITY EDUCATION et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, A134423 v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA et al., (Alameda County
United States v. Puerto Rico Indus. Dev. Co.public domain
BESOSA, District Judge. *165Before the Court is the United States' motion for summary judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56 (" Rule 56"). (Docket No. 142.) The United States seeks to recover $ 5,398,161.04 from defendant Puerto Rico Industrial Development Company ("PRIDCO") pursuant to the Comprehensive Environmental Response,
Nationwide Mutual Ins. Co. v. Perezpublic domain
52 F.Supp.2d 297 (1999) NATIONWIDE MUTUAL INS. CO., Plaintiff, v. Orlando Otero PEREZ, et. al., Defendant. Nos. CIV. A. 97-2172(JP), CIV. A. 97-2347. United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. June 9, 1999. *298 Harry R. Nadal-Arcelay, Cancio, Nadal, Rivera & Diaz, San Juan, PR, for Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company, pla
Garcia-Sanchez v. Roman Abreupublic domain
270 F.Supp.2d 255 (2003) Rafael GARCIA SANCHEZ, et als., Plaintiff, v. Jose R. ROMAN ABREU, et als., Defendants. Civil No. 01-1543(JAG). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. July 10, 2003. *257 Pablo Landrau-Pirazzi, Ivan M. Castro-Ortiz, Eliezer Aldarondo-Ortiz, Claudio Aliff-Ortiz, Alice M. Velazquez, Aldarondo & L
Craig Lyons v. Conagra Foods Packaged Foods Lpublic domain
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 17-3134 ___________________________ Craig Lyons, Individually and on Behalf of Others Similarly Situated; Justin Anderson, Individually and on Behalf of Others Similarly Situated; Tommy Applegate, Individually and on Behalf of Others Similarly Situated; Brandon Etzkorn, I
Ojeda-Rodríguez v. Zayaspublic domain
666 F.Supp.2d 240 (2009) Marta OJEDA-RODRIGUEZ, Plaintiff, v. Yolanda ZAYAS, et al., Defendants. Civil No. 05-2332 (FAB). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. October 22, 2009. *246 Manuel San-Juan-Demartino, Manuel San Juan Law Office, San Juan, PR, for Plaintiff. Francisco A. Ojeda-Diez, P.R. Department of Justi
Rodríguez-Borton v. Pereira-Castillopublic domain
593 F.Supp.2d 399 (2009) Claudia S. RODRIGUEZ-BORTON, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Hon. Miguel A. PEREIRA-CASTILLO, et al., Defendants. Civil No. 06-1754 (FAB). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. January 16, 2009. *402 Carlos I. Prieto-Padilla, Jose L. Cabiya-Morales, Cabiya & Molero Law Office, PSC, San Juan, PR, for Pl
OPINION & ORDER LORETTA A. PRESKA, Chief Judge: Plaintiff, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”), filed this action against Defendant Bloomberg L.P. (“Bloomberg”) after several current and former employees had filed charges with the EEOC alleging sex/pregnancy discrimination and retaliation1 in violation of Title
Garcia v. Tyson Foods, Inc.public domain
534 F.3d 1320 (2008) Adelina GARCIA; Antonio Garcia; Jeronimo Vargas-Vera; Efrain Aguilar; Paulina Aguilar; Adelaida Aguirre; Jose R. Aguirre; Salvador Almanza; Miguel Amaya; Rogelio Andrade; Jesus Anguiano; Efigenia Arana; Jose R. Arana; Ramon Arana; Alma Armendariz; Jorge L. Banda Valadez; Delfino Barragan; Lucia Barragan; Ramon P. Barragan; Holga Benitez; Baltazar Bonilla; Maria Guadalupe Bonilla; Catalina Bustillos; Bernardo Calderon; Etelvina Calder
United States v. Lopez-Diazpublic domain
OPINION AND ORDER BESOSA, District Judge. Pending before the Court is defendant Jose Lopez Diaz’s motion for a judgment of acquittal and for a new trial, (Docket No. 350), defendant Carlos Lopez Diaz’s motion for a judgment of acquittal, (Docket No. 351), and defendant Carlos Lopez Diaz’s motion for a new trial, (Docket No. 352). For the reasons discussed below, the Court DENIES both defendants’ motion for a
Perez v. Mountaire Farms, Inc.public domain
650 F.3d 350 (2011) Luisa PEREZ; Elvin Francisco Gonza Osovio, Individually and on behalf of all persons similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. MOUNTAIRE FARMS, INCORPORATED, a Delaware Corporation; Mountaire Farms of Delaware, Incorporated, a Delaware Corporation, Defendants-Appellants, and Ray Barrientos; Maria Gomez; Juana Miguel; Gibran Moya Rivera; Gloria Paneto Castro; Shitwa Perez Lopez; Jose Antonio Santiag Lugo; Maritza Alcover
In re World Trade Center Disaster Site Litigationpublic domain
ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT OF SPECIAL COUNSEL AND PROVIDING FOR EFFECTIVENESS OF SETTLEMENT ALVIN K. HELLERSTEIN, District Judge: I conducted a hearing on December 22, 2010, to consider and regulate two issues necessary to be resolved to consummate the Affirmation of Final Settlement as provided by § XXII of the Settlement Process Agreement, As Amended (“SPA”): (1) the report by the Special Counsel
In Re World Trade Center Disaster Site Litigationpublic domain
762 F.Supp.2d 631 (2010) In re WORLD TRADE CENTER DISASTER SITE LITIGATION. In re Lower Manhattan Disaster Site Litigation. In re Combined World Trade Center and Lower Manhattan Disaster Site Litigation. Nos. 21 MC 100(AKH), 21 MC 102, 21 MC 103. United States District Court, S.D. New York. December 30, 2010. *632 Marion Sandra M
Filed 4/20/16 (review denied 8/22/16; reposted to include Supreme Court statements upon denial of review) CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE CAMPAIGN FOR QUALITY EDUCATION et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, A134423 v
Daniel Campbell v. City of Los Angelespublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT DANIEL CAMPBELL; et al, * No. 15-56990 Plaintiffs-Appellants, D.C. No. v. 2:04-cv-08592- AG-AJW CITY OF LOS ANGELES, Defendant-Appellee. CESAR MATA,
Rosario Nevarez v. Torres Gaztambidepublic domain
633 F.Supp. 287 (1986) Guillermo ROSARIO NEVAREZ, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Jaime TORRES GAZTAMBIDE, et al., Defendants. Civ. No. 85-1117 HL. United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. March 31, 1986. *288 Frank Rodríguez García, Ponce, P.R., for plaintiffs. Carlos del Valle, Ramirez & Ramirez, Edificio Tres Rios, Hato
Wieland v. Assaf (In re Briones-Coroy)public domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER SIDNEY B. BROOKS, Bankruptcy Judge. TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Introduction .690 II. Summary.691 A. A Summary of this Opinion.691 B. The Enactment of 11 U.S.C. § 110 in the Reform Act of 1994 .692 C. The 2005 Amendments .693 D. The Unintended Consequences of 11 U.S.C. § 110.694