Cases

570 S.E.2d 217 (2002) FIRST UNION NATIONAL BANK OF DELAWARE, Plaintiff v. BANKERS WHOLESALE MORTGAGE, LLC, and BWM Mortgage, LLC, Defendants. No. COA01-1543. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. October 1, 2002. *219 James, McElroy & Diehl, P.A. by Edward T. Hinson, Jr. and Richard S. Wright, Charlotte, for plaintiff-appellee.

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE MATTEL, INC., AND FISHER- ) PRICE, INC., ) ) C.A. No. N23C-01-042 MAA CCLD Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) ) XL INSURANCE AMERICA, INC.; ) ACE PROPERTY AND CASUALTY ) INSURANCE CO.; ACE ) AMERICAN INSURANCE

Case: 24-20234 Document: 75-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/16/2025 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ____________ United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED No. 24-20234

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT CONSUMER FINANCIAL No. 23-55259 PROTECTION BUREAU, D.C. No. Plaintiff-Appellee, 2:15-cv-07522- v. JFW-RAO CASHCALL, INC.; WS FUNDING, ORDER AND LLC; DELBERT SERVICES AMENDED CORPORATION; J. PAUL OPINION REDDAM,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA REVEREND FATHER EMMANUEL LEMELSON, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 24 - 2415 (SLS) v. Judge Sparkle L. Sooknanan SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION The Revere

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT CONSUMER FINANCIAL No. 23-55259 PROTECTION BUREAU, D.C. No. Plaintiff-Appellee, 2:15-cv-07522- JFW-RAO v. CASHCALL, INC.; WS FUNDING, OPINION LLC; DELBERT SERVICES CORPORATION; J. PAUL REDDAM, Defendants-Appellants. Appeal from the Unit

BRYANT, Judge dissenting. The majority holds the trial court properly dismissed plaintiffs’ claims against Preferred Trusts 1997-1 (hereafter “the Trust” or “defendants”) for lack of personal jurisdiction, finding that plaintiffs had not satisfied any of the sections of North Carolina’s long-arm statute that plaintiffs asserted. I strongly disagree and therefore respectfully dissent from the majority opinion b

Rel: November 8, 2024 Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the advance sheets of Southern Reporter. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions, Alabama Appellate Courts, 300 Dexter Avenue, Montgomery, Alabama 36104-3741 ((334) 229-0650), of any typographical or other errors, in order that corrections may be made before the opinion is printed in Southern Reporter. SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA OCTOBER TERM, 20

Margaret B. Seymour, Senior United States District Judge Plaintiff Amy Elizabeth Williams, as both Personal Representative of the Estate of [Redacted] and individually, (hereinafter collectively, "Plaintiff"), brought the within action against Defendants Quest Diagnostics, Inc. ("Quest"); Athena Diagnostics, Inc. ("Athena"); and ADI Holdings Inc. ("ADI") (hereinafter collectively, "Defendants") in the Court of Common Pleas for Richl

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA META PLATFORMS, INC., Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 23-3562 (RDM) FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, et al, Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER This case has its origins in a 2011 agreement between Defendant Federal Trade Commission (“FTC” or the “Co

Liu, J. *229 The practice of short-term deferred deposit lending-often called "payday" or "cash advance" lending-generally involves small sums that become due on the borrower's next payday. In return for the loan, the borrower provides the lender with a personal check for the amount of the l

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE JOSEPH C. BAMFORD and YOUNG MIN ) BAN, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2019-0005-JTL ) PENFOLD, L.P.; DELAWARE VALLEY ) REGIONAL CENTER, LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA META PLATFORMS, INC., Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 23-3562 (RDM) FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, et al, Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER This case has its origins in a 2011 agreement between Defendant Federal Trade Commission (“FTC” or the “Co

PRELIMINARY PRINT Volume 603 U. S. Part 1 Pages 204–278 OFFICIAL REPORTS OF THE SUPREME COURT June 27, 2024 Page Proof Pending Publication REBECCA A. WOMELDORF reporter of decisions NOTICE: This preliminary print is subject to formal revision before the bound volume is published. Users are

(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2023 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit

MEMORANDUM ORDER CATHY BISSOON, District Judge. This case was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Susan Paradise Baxter for pretrial proceedings in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A) and (B), and Rules 72.C, 72.D and 72.G of the Local Rules for Magistrates. On January 27, 2014, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation (Doc. 318)

(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2023 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit

(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2023 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 666 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 667 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT STATE OF CALIFORNIA; STATE OF No. 19-16299 COLORADO; STATE OF CONNECTICUT; STATE OF D.C. No. DELAWARE; STATE OF HAWAII; 4:19-cv-00872- STATE OF MAINE; STATE OF HSG MINNESOTA; STATE OF NEW JERSEY; STATE OF NEW MEXICO; STATE OF NEVADA; STATE OF NEW YORK; STATE OF OREGON; COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA; STATE OF ILLINOIS; STATE OF MARYLAND; DANA NESS