Cases

MEMORANDUM OPINION BERYL A. HOWELL, District Judge. Pending before the Court is Priority One Services, Inc.’s (hereinafter “Priority One”) petition to confirm an arbitration award, and respondent W & T Travel Services, LLC’s (hereinafter “W & T”) motion to vacate, modify, and correct this award. Priority One alleges that W &am;

RILEY, Chief Judge. This diversity jurisdiction1 case hinges on the interpretation under Minnesota law of two contractual provisions. The first is an indemnification clause in a contract between Physical Distribution Services, Inc. (PDSI)2 and Miller Transporters, Inc. (Miller). The second is a provision in an insurance contract between Harleysville Insurance Co. (Har

(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2018 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit Ti

In the United States Court of Federal Claims Nos. 13-402, 13-917, 13-935, 13-972, 14-47, 14-93, 14-174, 14-175, 17-997 (consolidated) (Filed: 18 June 2021) *************************************** ALTA WIND I OWNER LESSOR C, * et al., * * Plaintiffs, * * Supplement the Record; Remand; v.

Justice KAVANAUGH, concurring. *2092I join the Court's eloquent and persuasive opinion in full. I write separately to emphasize two points. I Consistent with the Court's case law, the Court today applies a history and tradition test in examining and upholding the constitutionality of the Bladensburg Cro

In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS Filed: July 6, 2021 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * KRISTINE AKERS and * MATTHEW AKERS, as parents of * PUBLISHED A.A., a minor, * * No. 15-597V Petitioners, * v. *

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-23-00077-CV Norman Engel, Appellant v. Texas Department of Insurance–Division of Workers’ Compensation; Commissioner Cassie Brown, in Her Official Capacity; The State of Texas and the Attorney General of the State of Texas by and through Ken Paxton in His Official Capacity as Attorney General o

AMENDED ORDER1 RAYMOND P. MOORE, United States District Judge ' This matter is before the Court Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment *1094(“Motion”) (EOF No. 57) on Plaintiff Wells Fargo Insurance Services USA, Inc.’s (“Wells Fargo”) claims arising from allegations that Defendants engaged in wrongful conduct, des

CONSOLIDATED DECISION Before this Court are two motions to dismiss pursuant to the doctrine of forum non conveniens. The Plaintiffs in these matters object to the motions and request guidance from this Court as to the application of Rhode Island Supreme Court opinionKedy v. A.W. Chesterton Co., 946 A.2d 1171 (R.I. 2008), to ongoing asbestos litigation. Due to simil

DECISION Before this Court are Defendant Union Carbide Corporation's ("Defendant") Motion To Dismiss for Forum Non Conveniens and a Motion To Apply Foreign Law made by Defendant and several other joining Defendants (collectively "Defendants").1 Jurisdiction is pursuant to G.L. 1956 § 8-2-14.

REENA RAGGI, Circuit Judge: On the morning of September 11, 2001, a group of Islamic terrorists murdered almost 3,000 persons by hijacking four commercial airplanes and crashing them into New York’s World Trade Center, the Pentagon, and a field in Shanksville, Pennsylvania. 1 Ten years to the day after these horrific even

525 F.Supp.2d 448 (2007) WOLTERS KLUWER FINANCIAL SERVICES INC., Plaintiff, v. SCIVANTAGE, ADNANE CHARCHOUR, SANJEEV DOSS, CAMERON ROUTH and GREGORY ALVES, Defendants. No. 07 CV 2352(HB). United States District Court, S.D. New York. November 30, 2007. *449 Brian Jason Fischer, Harry Sandick, Charles B. Sklarsky, Jenner & Bloc

MEMORANDUM OPINION JOHN D. BATES, District Judge. Before the Court is petitioner Oehme, van Sweden & Associates, Inc.’s (“OvS”) motion for confirmation of an arbitration award in its favor and [9] respondents Maypaul Trading & Services Ltd. and Elena Pinchuk’s motion to vacate that award.

DUBINA, Chief Judge, and HULL, Circuit Judge: Soon after Congress passed the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, Pub.L. No. 111-148, 124 Stat. 119 (2010), amended by Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010 (“HCERA”), Pub.L. No. 111-152, 124 Stat. 1029 (2010) (the “Act”), the plaintiffs brought this action challenging the Act’s constitutionality. The plaintiffs are 26 states, private individual

853 F.Supp. 759 (1994) SEMETEX CORPORATION and Eaton Corporation, Plaintiffs, v. UBAF ARAB AMERICAN BANK, Defendant. No. 93 Civ. 566 (LBS). United States District Court, S.D. New York. June 2, 1994. *760 *761 Ross & Hardies, New York City, Philip Goldstein, Chicago, IL, Michael H. King, Ku

WEICK, Circuit Judge. The controversy in these appeals arose out of the sale of 25,000 pounds of Clemson Spineless Okra Seed [C/S] okra seed 1 in *1061 September, 1967 by Ferry-Morse Seed Company, Inc. [F-M], a California corporation, to

824 F.Supp. 1374 (1993) Cheryl KLINGER, Linda Lange, Gweniver Lay, Stacy Finn, Individually and on Behalf of Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiffs, v. NEBRASKA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONAL SERVICES, Frank Gunter, former Director, Nebraska Department of Correctional Services, Harold Clarke, Director, Nebraska Department of Correctional Services, Larry Tewes, Assistant Director, Nebraska Department *1375 of Correc

6 F.3d 367 RICO Bus.Disp.Guide 8411, 37 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 1012 Emmett R. DAVIS, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees,Cross-Appellants (90-3587/3881),v.The MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW YORK(90-3560/3879); Trans World Assurance Company(90-3561/3878), Defendants-Appellants,Cross-Appellees,Donald S. Fletcher; Fletcher Insurance Associates, Defendants. Nos. 90-3560, 9

558 P.2d 1211 (1976) 276 Or. 1135 AMERICAN TIMBER & TRADING CO., Respondent, v. B.E. NIEDERMEYER, Jr., et al., Appellants. American Timber & Trading Co., Respondent-Cross-Appellant, v. B.E. Niedermeyer, Jr., and Elma Niedermeyer, Appellants-Cross-Respondents. Supreme Court of Oregon. Argued and Submitted September 9, 1976. Decided Dec

985 F.2d 1427 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff,v.Royal N. HARDAGE, Oklahoma National Stockyards Company,J.O.C. Oil Exploration, Dal-Worth Industries, Double Eagle,Samuel Bishkin, doing business as Eltex Chemical, L & SBearing Company, Kerr-McGee Corporation, Cato Oil, AdvanceChemical Distribution, Inc., Allied-Signal, Inc., AT & TTechnologies, Inc., Ashland Oil, Inc., Atlantic RichfieldCompany, Borg-Warner