Cases

PER CURIAM. Amana Society, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiary Amana Farms, Inc. (collectively, “Amana”) seek reversal of the district court’s 1 grant of summary judgment to Excel Engineering, Inc. (“Excel”). The court concluded that Amana failed to establish that Excel breached a duty of care to Amana in a design-cert

WALLACE, Circuit Judge: Filco sued alleging that Amana Refrigeration, Inc. (Amana), Boulevard T.V. & Appliance, Inc. (Boulevard) and Lamco Appliance, Inc. (Lamco) conspired to fix prices in violation of section 1 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1, and California’s Cartwright Act, CaLBus. & Prof.Code § 16720 (West 1964). Filco also asserted five other state law claims against Amana. The district court dismissed thes

679 F.Supp.2d 539 (2010) BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION and Boston Scientific Scimed Inc., Plaintiffs, v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON INC. and Cordis Corporation, Defendants. Civ. Nos. 07-333-SLR, 07-348-SLR, 07-409-SLR, 07-765-SLR. United States District Court, D. Delaware. January 20, 2010. *542 Josy W. Ingersoll, Esquire, Karen L. Pa

666 S.E.2d 335 (2008) SUPERVALU, INC., et al. v. Jonathan F. JOHNSON. Record No. 071995. Supreme Court of Virginia. September 12, 2008. *337 Edward J. Fuhr (Eric H. Feiler, Hunton & Williams, Richmond, on briefs), for appellants. L. Steven Emmert, Virginia Beach (Verbena Askew, Hampton; Sykes, Bourdon, Ahern & Levy

528 F.Supp.2d 654 (2007) LEAR AUTOMOTIVE DEARBORN, INC. and Lear Corporation, Plaintiffs, v. JOHNSON CONTROLS, INC. and Johnson Controls Interiors LLC, Defendants. No. 04-73461. United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division. November 2, 2007. *655 *656 David M. Hayes, Edward J

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 15-2047 Filed March 22, 2017 GENE L. FRANKLIN and CONNIE JOHNSON, EXECUTORS OF THE FAE BLACK ESTATE; GENE L. FRANKLIN, CONNIE JOHNSON, CURTIS L. FRANKLIN, and GREGORY S. FRANKLIN, Plaintiffs-Appellees/Cross-Appellants, vs. MICHAEL JOHNSTON, ELIZABETH JOHNSTON, STEVE JOHNSTON, KASONDRA JOHNSTON, JAMES YEAGER, and JUDITH YEAGER, Defendants-Appellants/Cross-Appellee

By JUDGE JAY T. SWETT Plaintiff has filed an amended motion for judgment, including four separate counts arising out of her termination from employment by the defendants. Count I is under Va. Code § 18.2-500, in which she alleges a conspiracy to injure her reputation, trade, business or profession. Count II alleges a tortious interference with contractual relations. Count III seeks damages for intentional infliction of emoti

315 N.W.2d 101 (1982) AMANA SOCIETY, Appellee, v. COLONY INN, INC., an Iowa Corporation James C. Roemig, Donald C. Krauss, Eunice Krauss, and Ramon F. Goerler, Appellants. No. 63269. Supreme Court of Iowa. January 20, 1982. *104 James F. Pickens, of Pickens, Barnes & Abernathy, Cedar Rapids, for appellants. James W. Ha

709 F.2d 1257 1983-1 Trade Cases 65,450, 13 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 693 FILCO, a California partnership, Anton J. Saca, Ilham Saca,Rose M. Karadsheh, and Nahil Altenhofen,Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.AMANA REFRIGERATION, INC., a Delaware corporation; LamcoAppliance, Inc., a California corporation andBoulevard T.V. & Appliance, Inc., aCalifornia corporation,Defendants-Appellees.

The opinion of the court was delivered by HAVEY, J.A.D. The central issue on appeal is whether the four-year statute of limitations under the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC), N.J.SA 12A:2-725(1), is applicable to the parties’ dealership agreement. *535Plaintiff Custom Communications Engineering, Inc. (Custom) appeals from

269 N.J. Super. 531 (1993) 636 A.2d 80 CUSTOM COMMUNICATIONS ENGINEERING, INC., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. E.F. JOHNSON COMPANY, A MINNESOTA CORPORATION; TEL-AIR COMMUNICATIONS, INC., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION; AND JONACH ELECTRONICS, INC., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS, AND WESTERN UNION CORPORATION, A DELAWARE CORPORATION; ROBERT LIBBEY, AN INDIVIDUAL; REILLY RADIO COMMUNICATIONS, A SOLE PROPRIETORSHIP; GL

OPINION OF THE COURT ALITO, Circuit Judge: Defendant Amana Refrigeration, Inc. (“Amana”), a manufacturer of home appliances, appeals a judgment for $9,376,000 in favor of plaintiff Cooper Distributing Co., Inc. (“Cooper”), a distributor of Amana home appliances. After supplying Cooper with its products for approximately 30 years, Amana attempted to terminate its relationship with Cooper. Cooper sued, claimin

249 F.2d 246 MOIST COLD REFRIGERATOR CO., Inc., a Corporation, Appellant,v.LOU JOHNSON CO., Inc., a Corporation; Meier & Frank Company, Inc., a Corporation; Admiral Corporation, a Corporation; and Amana Refrigeration, Inc., a Corporation, Appellees. No. 15057. United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit. October 17, 1957. Rehearing Denied

BARNES, Circuit Judge. This is an action for damages for patent infringement of Reissue Patent No. 23,05s.1 *It was tried in the District Court with a jury. Prior to the trial, Lou Johnson Co. and Meier & Frank Co., both corporations, were eliminated as defendants. The remaining defendants moved for a directed verdict at the conclusion of the plaintiff’s case

HEALY, Circuit Judge. This matter is before us on appeal from a summary judgment for the defendants (appellees) in an action brought by appellant for infringement of reissue patent No. 23,058. Appellant is assignee of the original patent No. 2,056,165, which was issued October 6, 1936 after protracted proceedings before the Patent Office. The patent claimed a combination of known refrigeration elements and prin

217 F.2d 39 103 U.S.P.Q. 410 MOIST COLD REFRIGERATOR CO., Inc., a corporation, Appellant,v.LOU JOHNSON CO., Inc., a corporation, Meier & Frank Co.,Inc., a corporation, Admiral Corporation, acorporation, and Amana Refrigeration,Inc., a corporation, Appellees. No. 13811. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Nov. 24

95 N.W.2d 909 (1959) Adolph T. BERGER et al., Appellants and Appellees, v. AMANA SOCIETY et al., Appellees and Appellants. No. 49571. Supreme Court of Iowa. April 8, 1959. *910 Swift & Swift, Marengo, Edward J. Von Hoene, Williamsburg, and Messer, Hamilton & Cahill, Iowa City, for appellants and appellees. Bleakley

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 22-0993 Filed May 10, 2023 SHRI LAMBODARA, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, vs. PARCO, LTD., Defendant-Appellant. ________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Black Hawk County, Melissa Anderson-Seeber, Judge. Parco, Ltd. appeals from the district court’s grant o

Opinion and Order of June 22, 2012 POSNER, Circuit Judge. In my opinion and order of May 22, following the Daubert hearing held on the 16th, I ruled that proposed testimony by three of the parties’ damages experts (one for Apple and two for Motorola) was inadmissible. Apple, Inc. v. Motorola, Inc., No. 1:11-cv-8540, 2012 WL 1959560 (N.D.Ill. May 22, 2012); see Fed.R.Evid. 702, 703. This rul

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS OR TRANSFER MARK W. BENNETT, District Judge. TABLE OF CONTENTS I.INTRODUCTION........................................................976 A. ■ Factual Background.................................................976 B. Procedural Background...............