Cases

II. REMAINING ISSUES Based on our finding Quicken did not violate the attorney preference statute, we decline to address its remaining arguments. **582See Futch v. McAllister Towing of Georgetown, Inc., 335 S.

JUSTICE KITTREDGE: We accepted this declaratory judgment matter in our original jurisdiction to determine if Respondents/Petitioners Quicken Loans, Inc. (Quicken Loans) and Title Source, Inc. (Title Source) have engaged in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL).1 In their complaint, Petitioners/Respondents Vance L. and Thelma Boone, Travis G. and Theresa S. Messex, and Brian and Kelli Johnson (coll

Acting Chief Justice, HEARN. This case is a consolidation of five separate lawsuits instituted by county administrators and registers of deeds in Allen-dale, Beaufort, Colleton, Hampton, and Jasper Counties (collectively, Respondents) against MERSCORP Holdings, Inc.; Mortgage Electronic Registrations Systems, Inc. (MERS); and numerous banking institutions (collectively, Petitioners). Respondents contend Petitioners have engage

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS No. 17-0092 ALLEN GUMPENBERGER, APPELLANT, V. ROBERT L. WILKIE, SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, APPELLEE. On Appeal from the Board of Veterans' Appeals (Argued November 2, 2018 Decided Februa

OPINION AND ORDER AFTER TRIAL SCOTT W. DALES, Chief Judge. I. INTRODUCTION Marcia R. Meoli, as chapter 7 trustee for the bankruptcy estate of Shawn C. Allen (the “Debtor”), sued the Debtor’s former wife, Tamara Cooper, to avoid and recover specific transfers the Debtor made to Ms. Cooper pursuant to a judgment of divorce (the “JOD”). Ms. Meoli (the “Trustee” or “Plaintiff’)

USCA4 Appeal: 24-142 Doc: 91 Filed: 08/01/2025 Pg: 1 of 42 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 24-141 SKYLINE TOWER PAINTING, INC., Petitioner, v. ELIZABETH L. GOLDBERG; MYRIAM RALSTON; BENJAMIN ROBERTS; JOSHUA C. TOHN;

USCA4 Appeal: 24-1250 Doc: 88 Filed: 08/01/2025 Pg: 1 of 42 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 24-141 SKYLINE TOWER PAINTING, INC., Petitioner, v. ELIZABETH L. GOLDBERG; MYRIAM RALSTON; BENJAMIN ROBERTS; JOSHUA C. TOHN; M

USCA4 Appeal: 24-1251 Doc: 88 Filed: 08/01/2025 Pg: 1 of 42 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 24-141 SKYLINE TOWER PAINTING, INC., Petitioner, v. ELIZABETH L. GOLDBERG; MYRIAM RALSTON; BENJAMIN ROBERTS; JOSHUA C. TOHN; M

USCA4 Appeal: 24-141 Doc: 92 Filed: 08/01/2025 Pg: 1 of 42 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 24-141 SKYLINE TOWER PAINTING, INC., Petitioner, v. ELIZABETH L. GOLDBERG; MYRIAM RALSTON; BENJAMIN ROBERTS; JOSHUA C. TOHN;

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 21-3010 ___________________________ Andrew Magdy Plaintiff - Appellant v. I.C. System, Inc.

MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER JOHN F. KEENAN, United States District Judge: Before this Court is Defendants Schoel-ler Area Systems, Inc. (“SAS”) and Schoel-ler Area Systems Services, B.V. f/k/a Schoeller Area Systems, N.V.’s (“SAS BV”) motion to dismiss Plaintiffs Myers Industries, Inc. (“Myers”) and Buckhorn, Inc.’s (“Buckhorn”) First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) for failure to state a claim under Federal

OPINION AND ORDER WILLIAM S. DUFFEY, JR., UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE ■ This matter is before the Court on Defendant Brian Kemp’s (“Defendant”) Motion to Dismiss [20]. Also before the Court is Plaintiff Project Vote, Inc.’s (“Plaintiff”) Motion for Preliminary Injunction [12]. I. BACKGROUND A. Summary Plaintiff seeks the disclosure, pursua

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 18-2990 ___________________________ Safeway Transit LLC; Aleksey Silenko lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiffs - Appellants v. Discount Party Bus, Inc., an inactive Minnesota corporation; Party Bus MN L

WESLEY, Circuit Judge: This appeal is the most recent chapter in the ongoing saga of the last decade's housing finance crisis. At the core of the appeal are three trusts (the "Trusts") composed of residential mortgage-backed securities that Defendant-Appellee GreenPoint Mortgage Funding, Inc. ("GreenPoint") sold in 2006 to Lehman Brothers Holding, Inc., and Lehman Brothers Bank, FSB (co

WILLIAM S. DUFFEY, JR., UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This matter is before the Court on Defendant XPO Intermodal, Inc.'s ("XPO") Partial Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint [13] (the "Motion to Dismiss"). I. BACKGROUND A. Introduction 1 This dispute arises from alleged misrepresentations and confidentiality bre

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY [63] DAVID R. GRAND, United States Magistrate Judge. Before the Court is Plaintiffs International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace, and Agricultural Implement Workers of America, Thomas Bode, Brace Eaton, William Burns, Peter Antonellis and Larry Preston’s (“UAW”) motion to compel the discovery of certain attorney-client privileged communicat

267 B.R. 118 (2001) In re NWFX, INC., Northwest Financial Express, Inc., and Gold Financial Express, Inc., Debtors. No. 86-15148F. United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Arkansas, Fayetteville Division. June 22, 2001. *119 *120 *121 *122

380 B.R. 324 (2008) In re TELIGENT INC., Debtors. Savage & Associates, P.C., as the Unsecured Claim Estate Representative of Teligent, Inc., Plaintiff, v. Alex Mandl, Defendant. Bankruptcy No. No. 01-12974(SMB), Adversary No. 03-02523. United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York. January 3, 2008. *325

MEMORANDUM OPINION, FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW OF PHASE I, PHASE II AND PHASE III AND ORDERS TO CLERK VOLUME I OF TWO VOLUMES, containing: Complete Table of Contents for both volumes Pages 385 to 462, inclusive. TABLE OF CONTENTS VOLUME I PHASE I PAGE Introduction 385 PHASE I FINDINGS OF FA

OPINION AND ORDERS DETERMINING WHETHER ACTIONS MAY BE MAINTAINED AS CLASS ACTIONS SCHWARZER, District Judge. INTRODUCTION Motions are pending before the Court in seven different actions brought under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq.) for class action determinations under Rule 23(c)(1), Fed.R. Civ.P.1 All of the motions raised co