⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

9 opinions for “ALBERT JOEL PINAL”

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010-06-23 · Published · cited 1095× · 609 F.3d 1011; 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 12858; 2010 WL 2509181
609 F.3d 1011 (2010) Wesley SIMMONS, husband; Sharon Simmons, wife, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. NAVAJO COUNTY, State of ARIZONA; Navajo County Board of Supervisors, governing board of Navajo County, Arizona; Gary Butler, Sheriff of Navajo County; David Burke, Jail Commander, Navajo County; Reynolds, Lieutenant; A. Warren, Sergeant; Deborah Jones, nurse and staff; Kartchner, Dr. and staff; Genie Greason, nurse, Defendants-Appellees.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019-12-16 · Published · cited 33× · 944 F.3d 1070
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT LESLIE LARAY CRAWFORD, No. 16-17138 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. v. 1:14-cv-01735- SAB CITY OF BAKERSFIELD, a municipal entity, and AARON STRINGER, Officer, OPIN
District Court, S.D. Iowa · 2017-09-05 · Published · cited 2× · 265 F. Supp. 3d 902
ORDER ON BENCH TRIAL ROBERT W. PRATT, Judge The United States of America (the “Government”) filed this action against Dico, Inc. (“Dico”) and its corporate affiliate Titan Tire Corporation (“Titan Tire”), (collectively “Defendants”) under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (“CERCLA”), 42 U.S.C. § 9601 et seq. Clerk’s No. 1. After awarding summary jud
Supreme Court of the United States · 2004-12-13 · Published · cited 402× · 160 L. Ed. 2d 548; 125 S. Ct. 577; 543 U.S. 157; 2004 U.S. LEXIS 8271; 34 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20154; 73 U.S.L.W. 4041; 18 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 44; 59 ERC (BNA) 1545
543 U.S. 157 (2004) COOPER INDUSTRIES, INC. v. AVIALL SERVICES, INC. No. 02-1192. Supreme Court of United States. Argued October 6, 2004. Decided December 13, 2004. CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. *158 *159 THOMAS, J., delivered the opin
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas) · 2013-08-13 · Published · cited 0×
Affirm in part; Reverse and Render in part; Remand and Opinion Filed August 13, 2013 S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas __________________________________ NO. 05-12-00963-CV CITY OF DALLAS, TEXAS, Appellant V. ANTHONY ARREDONDO, CHARLES S. SWANER, JAM
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas) · 2013-08-13 · Published · cited 0×
Affirm in part; Reverse and Render in part; Remand and Opinion Filed August 13, 2013 S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas __________________________________ NO. 05-12-00963-CV CITY OF DALLAS, TEXAS, Appellant V. ANTHONY ARREDONDO, CHARLES S. SWANER, JAM
Court of Appeals of Texas · 2013-08-13 · Published · cited 0× · 415 S.W.3d 327; 2013 WL 4076868
OPINION Opinion by Justice LANG-MIERS. The City of Dallas filed these interlocutory appeals from orders denying its pleas to the jurisdiction in four lawsuits filed against the City by current and former police officers, firefighters, and rescue officers (the Officers) alleging that the City breached its contract with them regarding their pay. We consolidated the appeals for the purpose of