Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “AI Design LLC and Custom Metal Fabrication LLC”
Van Den Heuvel v. AI Credit Corp.public domain
DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING MOTIONS TO DISMISS WILLIAM C. GRIESBACH, Chief Judge. This suit arises from an insurance premium .financing scheme entered into by Plaintiff Ronald H. Van Den Heuvel. Van Den Heuvel filed this action pro se in Brown County Circuit Court in Wisconsin. On April 4, 2012, Defendants removed the matter from the state court. Jurisdiction was asserted under 28 U.S.C. § 1332(
No. 01-14-00707-CV IN THE FILED IN 1st COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS FIRST COURT OF APPEALS 10/30/2015 1:52:16 PM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE at HOUSTON, TEXAS Clerk –––––––––
FILED 15-0547 7/24/2015 5:49:28 PM tex-6223072 SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS BLAKE A. HAWTHORNE, CLERK
Hale-Mills Construction, Ltd., Hale-Mills Construction, Inc., and HMC Contracting South Texas LLC v. Willacy Countypublic domain
ACCEPTED 13-15-00174-CV THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 7/22/2015 8:09:32 PM
ACCEPTED 15-25-00012-cv FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/8/2025 3:13 PM No. 15-25-00012-CV
ACCEPTED 03-14-00738-CV 4853036 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXA
Mid Continent Nail Corp. v. United Statespublic domain
OPINION AND ORDER CARMAN, Judge: Three cases are consolidated before the court, each challenging portions of Certain Steel Nails From the United Arab Emi *1310 rates, 77 Fed.Reg. 17,029 (Dep’t of Commerce Mar. 23, 2012) (final
Cyber Power Systems (USA) Inc. v. United Statespublic domain
Slip Op. 23-24 UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE CYBER POWER SYSTEMS (USA) INC., Plaintiff, Before: Leo M. Gordon, Judge v. UNITED STATES, Court No. 20-00124 Defendant. OPINION [Following trial on the issue of substantial transfor
ACCEPTED 15-25-00013-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/8/2025 12:26 PM No. 15-25-00013-CV
in Re Forum Studio, Inc. and Clayco, Inc.public domain
FILED 15-0674 11/16/2015 2:17:39 PM tex-7866695 SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS
Minova USA, Inc. v. Tom Jollypublic domain
RENDERED: FEBRUARY 19, 2026 TO BE PUBLISHED Supreme Court of Kentucky 2024-SC-0169-DG MINOVA USA, INC. APPELLANT ON REVIEW FROM COURT OF APPEALS V. NO. 2022-CA-1534 SCOTT CIRCUIT COURT NO. 18-CI-00772 TOM JOLLY
Alexander v. Chattahoochee Valley Community Collegepublic domain
325 F.Supp.2d 1274 (2004) Sanquita Chyverne ALEXANDER, Plaintiff, v. CHATTAHOOCHEE VALLEY COMMUNITY COLLEGE and Dr. Laurel Blackwell, etc., Defendants. Civil Action No. 3:03cv192-T. United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Northern Division. July 9, 2004. *1275 *1276 Afrika C. Parchman, Ter
ACCEPTED 03-14-00735-CV 4703327 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS
Select Building Systems, Inc. and Tri-Bar Ranch Company, Ltd. v. Robertson Electric, Inc.public domain
FILED IN NO. 13-212 4th COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 09/11/15 11:24:40 AM KEITH E. HOTTLE Clerk TAMI L. WOLE'F, C.S.R. PHONE: (830) 331-8286 NO. 13-212 ROBERTSON ELECTRIC, INC. ) IN THE DISTRICT COURT ) VS . ) 216TH JUD
JON S. TIGAR, United States District Judge Before the Court are cross-motions for partial summary judgment filed by Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Asia Vital Components Co. ("AVC") and Defendant/Counter-Claimant Asetek Danmark A/S. ECF Nos. 180, 186. Asetek has also filed several requests to strike. ECF No. 185. The Court will grant the motions to strike in part, grant Asetek's motion for partial summary judgment, and deny AVC's motio
American Innotek, Inc. v. United Statespublic domain
Patent Infringement; 28 U.S.C. § 1498; Pri- or Art; 35 U.S.C. § 102; Priority Date; 35 U.S.C. § 120; Invalidity; Obviousness; 35 U.S.C. § 103; Graham Factors; Objective Indicia of Nonobviousness; Nexus Requirement; Commercial Success; Long-felt Need; Copying. OPINION AND ORDER WILLIAMS, Judge This patent infringement case involves ba
Nordock Inc. v. Systems Inc.public domain
DECISION AND ORDER RUDOLPH T. RANDA, District Judge. The Plaintiff and Counterclaim-Defendant, Nordock Inc., (“Nordock”), and the Defendant-Counterclaimant, Systems Inc. (“Systems”), are rivals in the loading dock device industry. Both companies design, manufacture, and sell dock levelers which are mechanical devices used to create a bridge between loading dock surfaces and the surfaces of truck load beds
ACCEPTED 03-14-00510-CV 4243321 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS
Southern California Edison Co. v. United Statespublic domain
OPINION BASKIR, Judge. On April 20-28, 2009, this Court heard evidence on the plaintiffs damages stemming from the Federal Government’s failure to discharge its contractual obligation under the Standard Contract entered into between the Department of Energy (DOE) and the plaintiff utilities to begin acceptance and permanent storage of spent nuclear fuel (SNF) and High Level Waste (HLW). The plaint
in Re Michelin North America, Inc.public domain
ACCEPTED 14-15-00578-CV FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 7/22/2015 3:45:09 PM