Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “ADVANCED SURGERY CENTER v. UNITED HEALTHCARE INSURANCE COMPANY”
ORDER James M. Moody Jr., United States District Judge Pending is a motion filed by Surgical Center Development, Inc. d/b/a SurgCen-ter-Development (“SurgCenter”) and Tri State Advanced Surgery Center,- LLC (“Tri State”) - to - dismiss counterclaims (Docket No. 61). The "counterclaim plaintiffs, Connecticut General Life Insurance Company, Cigna Health and Life Insurance Company, and Cigna Healthcare of
Michelle Sampson v. Surgery Centerpublic domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA MICHELLE SAMPSON, ET AL. Plaintiff/Appellant, v. SURGERY CENTER OF PEORIA, LLC, ET AL. Defendants/Appellees. No. CV-20-0024-PR Filed July 30, 2021 Appeal from the Superior Court in Maricopa County No. CV2013-015707
PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT ________________ No. 18-3381 ________________ THE PLASTIC SURGERY CENTER, P.A., Appellant v. AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY On Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey (D.C. No. 3-17-cv-13467) District Judge: Honorable Freda L. Wolfson
MEMORANDUM YOHN, District Judge In 2013, Aetna Life Insurance Company sued Huntingdon Valley Surgery Center, Foundation Surgery Management, LLC (FSM), and Foundation Surgery Affiliates, LLC (FSA). Huntingdon Valley is an'ambulatory surgery center largely owned by twenty-two physicians. It is outside of Aetna’s network — that is, it has'no direct contract with Aetna to provide services to Aetna members at red
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Harry D. Leinenweber, Judge Before the Court is Defendant’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment [ECF No. 89]. For the reasons stated below, the Court grants Defendant’s Motion. I. BACKGROUND A. Factual Background The following facts are undisputed unless noted otherwise. Plaintiff Advanced Ambulatory Surgical Center, Inc
Furr v. Ridgewood Surgery & Endoscopy Center, LLCpublic domain
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Kathryn H. Vratil, United States District Judge Grace Furr brings claims against her former employer, Nueterra Healthcare Management, LLC (“Nueterra”); Ridge-wood Surgery & Endoscopy Center, LLC (“Ridgewood”) and Joseph T. Poggi, III., M.D. (“Dr. Poggi”). Under Title VII, 42 U.S.C § 2000e et seq., plaintiff alleges that Nueterra created a sexually hostile work environm
Furr v. Ridgewood Surgery & Endoscopy Center, LLCpublic domain
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Kathryn H. Vratil, United' States District Court Grace Furr brings claims against her former employer, Nueterra Healthcare *1218Management, LLC (“Nueterra”), Ridge-wood Surgery & Endoscopy Center, LLC (“Ridgewood”) and Joseph T. Poggi, III., M.D. (“Dr. Poggi”). Under Kansas common law, plaintiff alleges that Ridgewood a
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION JANET BOND ARTERTON, District Judge. Table of Contents I. Summary of Findings and Conclusions.......................................35 II. Background..............................................................36 A. Overview of Patented Technology..........................:.......36 B. Accused Instruments........
GREENVILLE SURGERY CENTER, LTD. v. Beebepublic domain
320 S.W.3d 850 (2010) GREENVILLE SURGERY CENTER, LTD., Appellant, v. Walter BEEBE, M.D., C. Bradley Bowman, M.D., Ronald L. Fellman, M.D., Henry Gelender, M.D., David G. Godfrey, M.D., Tyrone L. McCall, M.D., David Stager, Jr., M.D., David Stager, Sr., M.D., and Richard J. Starita, M.D., Appellees. No. 05-08-01045-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Dallas. July 9, 2010.
Proceedings (In Chambers): ORDER GRANTING EMPLOYER AND PLAN DEFENDANTS’ OMNIBUS MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS’ AMENDED COMPLAINT UNDER FED. R. CIV. P. 12(B)(6), AS WELL AS 12(B)(2), (4), AND (5), 20(A) AND 28 U.S.C. § 1404(A) [1062] [1070] [1071] [1072] [1075] [1077] [1078] [1080] [1081] [1082] [1083] [1084] [1085] [1086] [1088] [1089] [1090] [1091] [1092]. [1093] [1094] [1095] [1096] [1097] [1098] [1100] [1101] [1105] [1106] [1107] [1108] [1109] [1110]
Proceedings (In Chambers): ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PROVIDER COUNTER-DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS THE FIRST AMENDED COUNTERCLAIM AND JOINDER IN COUNTER-DEFENDANTS MICHAEL OMIDI, M.D. AND JULIAN OMIDI’S MOTION TO DISMISS FIRST AMENDED. COUNTERCLAIM [48] MICHAEL W. FITZGERALD, U.S. District Judge , This matter is before the Court on Provider Counter-Defendants’ (“Providers”) Motion to Dis
Naples Center for Dermatology & Cosmetic Surgery PA, d/b/a Riverchase Dermatology v. Ana Trisanpublic domain
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE NAPLES CENTER FOR ) DERMATOLOGY & COSMETIC ) SURGERY, PA d/b/a RIVERCHASE ) DERMATOLOGY, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2023-1231-BWD ) ANA TRISAN, )
Filed 11/30/20 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE STATE OF CALIFORNIA CENTER FOR HEALTHCARE D076513 EDUCATION AND RESEARCH, INC., Plaintiff, Cross-defendant and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. 37-2017- 00004475-CU-BC-CTL) v. INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS FO
514 F.Supp.2d 351 (2007) TYCO HEALTHCARE GROUP LP d/b/a United States Surgical, a division of Tyco Healthcare Group LP, Plaintiff Counterclaim Defendant, v. ETHICON ENDO-SURGERY, INC., Defendant-Counterclaimant. No. 3:04cv1702 (JBA). United States District Court, D. Connecticut. October 8, 2007. *352
Barton v. Advanced Radiologypublic domain
Willie James Barton, Jr. et al. v. Advanced Radiology P.A., et al., No. 1336, September Term 2019. Opinion by Wells, J. CIVIL LAW – MEDICAL MALPRACTICE – “LOSS OF CHANCE” Appellants argue that the trial court inappropriately applied the theory of “loss of chance” when it granted appellees’ motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict (JNOV) under Rule 2-532. CIVIL LAW – MEDICAL MALPRACTICE – “LOSS OF CHANCE” The Court of Special Appeals held that “loss of chance” remains unavailable as a
Doris Gray v. James Strong, ANPAC Louisiana Insurance Company and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Companypublic domain
Judgment rendered October 1, 2025. Application for rehearing may be filed within the delay allowed by Art. 2166, La. C.C.P. No. 56,512-CA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA
Canton Harbor Healthcare v. Robinsonpublic domain
Canton Harbor Healthcare Center, Inc. v. Felicia Robinson, et al., No. 22, September Term, 2024. Opinion by Biran, J. HEALTH CARE MALPRACTICE CLAIMS ACT – CERTIFICATE OF A QUALIFIED EXPERT SUBMITTED BY A REGISTERED NURSE – PROXIMATE CAUSE – PRESSURE ULCERS – Under the Health Care Malpractice Claims Act (the “HCMCA” or the “Act”), unless the sole issue in a claim is lack of informed consent, a claimant must file a “certificate of a qualified expert … attesting to departure from standards of care
24-1884 Neurological Surgery v. Dep’t of Health & Human Servs. In the United States Court of Appeals For the Second Circuit August Term, 2024 No. 24-1884 NEUROLOGICAL SURGERY PRACTICE OF LONG ISLAND, PLLC, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, U
623 F.Supp.2d 568 (2009) HORIZON BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff, v. EAST BRUNSWICK SURGERY CENTER et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 3:08-cv-4227(FLW). United States District Court, D. New Jersey. April 23, 2009. *570 Edward S. Wardell, Wardell, Craig, Annin & Baxter, LLP, Haddonfield, NJ, for Plaintiff.
Jennifer Akridge v. Alfa Mutual Insurance Companypublic domain
USCA11 Case: 22-12045 Document: 54-1 Date Filed: 02/16/2024 Page: 1 of 51 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 22-12045 ____________________ JENNIFER AKRIDGE,