Cases

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals Rita Joyce Glenn, individually and as personal representative of the Estate of Thomas Harold Glenn, deceased, Respondent, v. 3M Company, f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co.; Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, Individually and as Successor-In-Interest to Buffalo Pumps; Airgas USA, LLC; Aurora Pump; BW/IP Inc., a Subsidiary of Flowserve Corporation; CBS Corporation, a Delaware Corporation f/k/a Viacom, Inc., Success

United States Tax Court 160 T.C. No. 3 3M COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent ————— Docket No. 5816-13. Filed February 9, 2023. ————— P is the common parent company of the P consolidated group. As

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 23-3772 ___________________________ 3M Company, and Subsidiaries Appellant v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue Appellee

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 19-2899 ___________________________ In re: Bair Hugger Forced Air Warming Devices Products Liability Litigation ------------------------------ George Amador Plaintiff - Appellant

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 19-2932 ___________________________ In re: Bair Hugger Forced Air Warming Devices Products Liability Litigation ------------------------------ John Petitta lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff

17 F.3d 1453 38 ERC 1259, 305 U.S.App.D.C. 100, 62USLW 2549,24 Envtl. L. Rep. 20,544 3M COMPANY (MINNESOTA MINING AND MANUFACTURING), Petitioner,v.Carol M. BROWNER, Administrator of Environmental ProtectionAgency and Environmental Protection Agency, Respondents. No. 92-1126. United States Court of Appeals,District of Columbia Circuit.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA September 2025 Term FILED November 7, 2025 released at 3:00 p.m. No. 23-717 C. CASEY FORBES, CLERK

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 25-1468 ___________________________ Richard R. Goecke, an individual Plaintiff - Appellant v. 3M Company Defendant

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 23-1709 STATE OF MAINE, Plaintiff, Appellee, v. 3M COMPANY, INC., Defendant, Appellant. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MAINE [Hon. John A. Woodcock, Jr., U.S. District Judge]

If this opinion indicates that it is “FOR PUBLICATION,” it is subject to revision until final publication in the Michigan Appeals Reports. STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS 3M COMPANY, FOR PUBLICATION August 22, 2023 Plaintiff-Appellee,

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ROBERT L. WILKINS, District Judge. This matter is before the Court upon remand from the Court of Appeals. While this matter was on interlocutory appeal, the District of Columbia filed a motion to dismiss its appeal and to vacate the portion of this Court’s opinion that was the subject of the appeal. The Court of App

CONSOLIDATED DECISION Before this Court are two motions to dismiss pursuant to the doctrine of forum non conveniens. The Plaintiffs in these matters object to the motions and request guidance from this Court as to the application of Rhode Island Supreme Court opinionKedy v. A.W. Chesterton Co., 946 A.2d 1171 (R.I. 2008), to ongoing asbestos litigation. Due to simil

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Supreme Court John A. Tibbs and Margaret B. Tibbs, Respondents, v. 3M Company; 4520 Corp., Inc.; A.O. Smith Corporation; A. W. Chesterton Company; ABB Inc.; Air & Liquid Systems Corporation; AIW-2010 Wind Down Corp.; Amentum Environment & Energy, Inc.; Anchor/Darling Valve Company; Armstrong International, Inc.; Asbestos Corporation Limited ASCO, L.P.; Atlas Asbestos Co.; Atlas Turner, Inc.; AWT Air Company, Inc.; Bahnson, Inc.; Banner I

DONOVAN W. FRANK, United States District Judge *1089INTRODUCTION This matter is before the Court on a Partial Motion to Dismiss and Strike Plaintiffs' Consolidated Amended Complaint (the "Amended Complaint") brought by Defendant 3M Company ("3M" or "Defendant") (Doc. No. 87). For the reasons set forth below, the Court gran

OPINION BRIGHT, Circuit Judge. Jim Oaks appeals the district court’s summary judgment dismissing his claims asking for damages for breach of contract, promissory estoppel, and a statutory claim for additional wages filed pursuant to Ky. Rev.Stat. § 337. Oaks contends the district court erred in granting summary judgment to 3M Company (“3M”) because (1) juri

CONNOLLY, Judge Appellants brought product-liability actions in state and federal courts, alleging that respondent's forced-air warming device (FAWD) used to maintain patients' normal body temperature during surgery increased the risk of surgical-site infection (SSI). Each party moved to exclude the *19other party's experts; appellants moved to ad

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 07-3519 ___________ * 3M Company, * * Plaintiff - Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2004-IA-00289-SCT 3M COMPANY v. SIMEON JOHNSON, et al. DATE OF JUDGMENT: 03/24/2004 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. JANNIE M. LEWIS COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: HOLMES COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANT: BARRY W. FORD WALKER (BILL) JONES, III

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ABDUL K. KALLON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Tennessee Riverkeeper, Inc. (the “Riv-erkeeper”) filed this action seeking declaratory and injunctive relief under Section 7002(a)(1)(B) of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976, 42 U.S.C. *1156§ 6972(a)(1)(B) (the “RCRA”). Doc. 1. The court has for consider

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2002-CA-01651-SCT 3M COMPANY f/k/a MINNESOTA MINING AND MANUFACTURING COMPANY v. SIMEON JOHNSON, JAMES CURRY, BOBBY JOE LAWRENCE AND PHILLIP PATE DATE OF JUDGMENT: 01/30/2002 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. JANNIE M. LEWIS COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: HOLMES COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANT: DONN