Cases

C. A. 9th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.

C. A. 9th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.

OPINION MILLER, Judge. This case is before the court after argument on cross-motions for summary judgment. The issue to be decided is whether plaintiff may recompute her regular and alternative minimum income tax liability for 1984 and 1985 using passive activity losses incurred in 1987 and 1988. Plaintiff seeks a refund of income taxes and estimated interest paid for the 1984 and 1985 tax year

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 866 F. 2d 1336.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 866 F. 2d 1336.

MEMORANDUM OPINION THOMAS M. BRAHNEY, III, Chief Judge. This matter came before the Court on the Objection to Claim, Complaint and Request for Issuance of Writ of Sequestration and Attachment filed by the Chapter 7 Trustee, David Adler. Many of the issues of the Complaint have been addressed in previously entered Orders and Judgments of this Court resolving various Motions filed. A trial was held

590 F.3d 581 (2009) UNITED STATES of America, Appellant, v. Laura J. ADLER, Appellee. No. 09-1775. United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. Submitted: October 21, 2009. Filed: December 31, 2009. *582 Andrea E. Belgau, AUSA, argued, Omaha, NE, for appellant. Joseph Kuehl, argued, Steve Lefler, on the

605 F.Supp.2d 829 (2009) UNITED STATES of America v. Richard J. ADLER. No. A-04-CR-266(1)-LY. United States District Court, W.D. Texas, Austin Division. March 5, 2009. *831 John Marcus Bustamante, Fish & Richardson, PC, Austin, Paul A. Calli, Carlton Fields, Miami, FL, Betty H. Chen, Fish & Richardson, PC, Austin, Martha

594 F.2d 856 Adlerv.U. S. No. 78-1594 United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit 3/22/79 1 W.D.N.C. AFFIRMED

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 09-1775 ___________ United States of America, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * Distri

274 F.Supp.2d 583 (2003) UNITED STATES of America, v. Paul ADLER, Defendant. No. 03 CIV. 4559(CLB), 00 CR. 1284(CLB). United States District Court, S.D. New York. July 31, 2003. *584 James B. Comey, United States Attorney, By Andrew J. McCarthy, Assistant U.S. Attorney, United States Attorney's Office, Southern District of New Yo

DECISION AFTER TRIAL The Honorable Robert E. Grossman, United States Bankruptcy Judge Before the Court is the issue of whether the Plaintiffs, Ms. Lisa Ng (“Ms. Ng”) and a Hong Kong corporation of which she was the principal, Charming Trading Company (“Charming Trading”), have proven by a preponderance of the evidence four objections to discharge against Defendant Stewart Adler (the “Debtor” or “D

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 433 F. 2d 1282.

MEMORANDUM DECISION (Interim ruling on piercing the corporate veil) ROBERT E. GROSSMAN, Bankruptcy Judge. Before the Court is the limited issue of whether the corporate veil should be pierced in this case and the Debtor held liable for the debts of five related corporations, of which he was the sole shareholder, officer and director. The Plaintiffs hold a $2 million judgment against those

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied. Mr. Justice Black is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Opinion by Oliver, C.J. In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of plastic paperweights similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 67488, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.

TJOFLAT, Circuit Judge: A number of criminal statutes within the Federal Code mandate that a defendant, when convicted, forfeit to the United States as part of his sentence the lucre he acquired as a result of his criminal activity. In this case, the defendant, a lawyer, deposited the lucre in his law firm’s bank accounts, where it was commingled with the firm’s receipts from le