Cases

851 A.2d 240 (2004) UGI UTILITIES, INC., Petitioner, v. UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION BOARD OF REVIEW, Respondent. Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania. Argued December 8, 2003. Decided June 7, 2004. *243 Adam R. Long, Harrisburg, for petitioner. Judith M. Gilroy, Harrisburg, for respondent. BEFORE: COLINS, President Judg

775 A.2d 1178 (2001) 365 Md. 1 WASHINGTON SUBURBAN SANITARY COMMISSION, v. UTILITIES, INC. OF MARYLAND. No. 116, September Term, 2000. Court of Appeals of Maryland. June 21, 2001. Reconsideration Denied August 14, 2001. *1180 Kurt J. Fischer (Paul A. Tiburzi and Marta D. Harting of Piper M

ORDER ON REHEARING PER CURIAM. Verizon New England has petitioned for rehearing in No. 06-2151, one of the two cases addressed in our single decision of September 6, 2007. Verizon asks that we alter our judgment to delete our direction to the district court to make a primary jurisdiction referral to the FCC. Verizon proposes instead that the district court decision be vacated with directions to vacate the Maine

409 F.Supp.2d 660 (2006) NUVOX COMMUNICATIONS, INC. and NEWSOUTH COMMUNICATIONS CORP., Plaintiffs, v. NORTH CAROLINA UTILITIES COMMISSION; Jo Anne Sanford, Chairman, J. Richard Conder, Commissioner, Robert V. Owens, Jr., Commissioner, Sam J. Ervin, IV, Commissioner, Lorinzo L. Joyner, Commissioner, James Y. Kerr, II, Commissioner, and Michael F. Wilkins, Commissioner (in their official capacities as Commissioners of the North Carolina Utilities C

403 F.Supp.2d 96 (2005) VERIZON NEW ENGLAND INC. d/b/a Verizon Maine, Plaintiff v. MAINE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION et al., Defendants. No. CIV.05-53-B-C. United States District Court, D. Maine. November 30, 2005. *97 Catherine R. Connors, Pierce, Atwood LLP, Portland, ME, Donald W. Boecke, Verizon Communications, Boston, MA, Ma

509 F.3d 1 (2007) VERIZON NEW ENGLAND, INC., Plaintiff, Appellant, v. MAINE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION; Stephen L. Diamond, in his official capacity as Commissioner of the Maine Public Utilities Commission; Sharon M. Reishus, in her official capacity as Commissioner of the Maine Public Utilities Commission; Kurt W. Adams, in his official capacity as Commissioner of the Maine Public Utilities Commission, Defendants, Appellees. Verizon New Eng

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Twin Lakes Utilities, Inc., : CASES CONSOLIDATED Petitioner : : v. : No. 1289 C.D. 2021 : Pennsylvania Public Utility : Commission, : Respondent : Aqua Pennsylv

JUDGMENT ORDER * RICHARD L. NYGAARD, Circuit Judge. This cause came to be considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware and was submitted pursuant to Third Circuit LAR 34.1(a) on May 20, 2014. After considering the District Court’s referral to the Bankruptcy Court (In re Allegheny Health Educ. and Research Fou

OPINION DARDEN, Judge. STATEMENT OF THE CASE Bloomington Country Club and ten co-petitioners (collectively, "Country Club") appeal the order of the Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission ("IURC") that denied their request for injunctive relief, finding that the irrigation rate it had approved for City of Bloomington Water & Wastewater Utilities ("Utilities") was being properly applied

JUDGMENT Per Curiam (Lourie, Taranto, and Chen, Circuit Judges). This Cause having been heard and considered, it is Ordered and Adjudged: AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 86.

KING, Circuit Judge, dissenting: For the reasons more fully articulated in my opinion in the companion case, Bell Atlantic Maryland, Inc. v. MCI Worldcom, Inc., 2001 WL 123663, (4th Cir.2001) (King, J., dissenting), I also must dissent in this case. Once again, I heed — and the majority dismisses — the clear admonition of Justice Scalia: “[T]here is no doubt ... that if the federal courts believe a st

JERRY E. SMITH, Circuit Judge: The City of Clarksdale, acting by and through the Clarksdale Public Utilities Commission, appeals the denial of a motion to remand to state court for failure by defendant BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc. (“BellSouth”), to file its notice of removal timely. After denying the city’s motion for reconsider

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA UGI Utilities, Inc., : Petitioner : : No. 464 M.D. 2013 v. : : Argued: June 17, 2015 City of Lancaster, Charlotte : Katzenmoyer, Director of Public : Works, City Council for the City : of Lancaster and Pennsylvania : Public Uti

570 N.W.2d 451 (1997) UTILICORP UNITED INC. d/b/a Peoples Natural Gas Company, Plaintiff-Movant, v. IOWA UTILITIES BOARD, UTILITIES DIVISION, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, Defendant. No. 96-1399. Supreme Court of Iowa. November 26, 1997. Rehearing Denied January 9, 1998. *453 Helen C. Adams and Philip E. Stroffregen of

435 B.R. 27 (2009) NATIONAL RURAL UTILITIES CO-OPERATIVE FINANCE CORPORATION, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Jeffrey PROSSER, et al., Defendants. Civ. No. 09-111-SLR. United States District Court, D. Delaware. August 7, 2009. *28 Richard L. Horwitz, Esquire, and Suzanne M. Hill, Esquire, of Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP, Wilmington,

GÓMEZ, Chief Judge MEMORANDUM OPINION (September 30, 2009) Before the Court is the motion of the defendants National Rural Electric Cooperative Association and Glenn L. English (“English”) *951(defendants are jointly referred to as “NRECA”), to dismiss the above-captioned matter for lack of personal jurisdiction, pursua

OPINION BY SENIOR JUDGE JAMES GARDNER COLINS Petitioner UGI Utilities, Inc. (UGI) commenced this action in the Court's original *626 jurisdiction on October 13, 2015, seeking a declaratory judgment that certain ordinances of Respondent City of Reading (City) are invalid and a permanent

WILSON, J., for the Court: ¶ 1. The circuit court granted the motion to compel. arbitration filed by. defendants Kip Allen and Allen Utilities LLC (AU),1 finding that Allen and AU are third-party beneficiaries of two subcontracts, which contain arbitration provisions, between plaintiff Garrett Enterprises Consolidated Inc. (Garrett) and Hensley R. Lee Contracting Inc. (Lee). Howe

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Garvey, J.), dated September 20, 2010, as granted that branch of the motion of the defendant Orange and Rockland Utilities, Inc., which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it. Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as a

BRUNETTI, Circuit Judge: The Crow Tribe (“Tribe”) enacted the Railroad and Utility Tax Code (“RUTC”), which assesses a 3% tax on the full fair market value of all “utility property” located on tribal or trust lands within the exterior boundaries of the Crow Reservation (“Reservation”). Big Horn Electric Cooperative (“Big Horn”) filed an action in federal district court against several tribal officials for injunctive