Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “AC Evolution LLC”
Colibri Heart Valve LLC v. Medtronic Corevalve, LLCpublic domain
Case: 23-2153 Document: 59 Page: 1 Filed: 07/18/2025 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ COLIBRI HEART VALVE LLC, Plaintiff-Appellee v. MEDTRONIC COREVALVE, LLC, Defendant-Appellant ______________________ 2023-2153 ______________________ Appeal from the United States Dis
Opinion issued November 26, 2024 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-23-00097-CV NO. 01-23-00102-CV NO. 01-23-00103-CV NO. 01-23-00392-CV NO. 01-23-00393-CV
Fmc Corporation v. Sharda USA, LLCpublic domain
Case: 24-2335 Document: 47 Page: 1 Filed: 08/01/2025 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ FMC CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellee v. SHARDA USA, LLC, Defendant-Appellant ______________________ 2024-2335 ______________________ Appeal from the United States Distr
Ma'Ayergi & Associates, LLC v. Pro Search, Inc.public domain
974 A.2d 724 (2009) 115 Conn.App. 662 MA'AYERGI AND ASSOCIATES, LLC, et al. v. PRO SEARCH, INC., et al. No. 29706. Appellate Court of Connecticut. Argued April 14, 2009. Decided July 14, 2009. *725 Allen A. Currier, Burlington, for the appellant (plaintiff Hamza Ma'Ayergi). Brenden
Dubaldo Electric, LLC v. Montagno Construction, Inc.public domain
988 A.2d 351 (2010) 119 Conn.App. 423 DuBALDO ELECTRIC, LLC v. MONTAGNO CONSTRUCTION, INC., et al. No. 30063. Appellate Court of Connecticut. Argued October 16, 2009. Decided February 23, 2010. *354 Robert J. O'Brien, Hartford, for the appellants-appellees (named defendant et al.).
Mobility Workx, LLC v. Unified Patents, LLCpublic domain
Case: 20-1441 Document: 89 Page: 1 Filed: 10/13/2021 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ MOBILITY WORKX, LLC, Appellant v. UNIFIED PATENTS, LLC, Appellee ANDREW HIRSHFELD, PERFORMING THE FUNCTIONS AND DUTIES OF THE UNDER SECRETARY OF COMMERCE FOR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND DIRECTOR OF THE UNITE
Mobility Workx, LLC v. Unified Patents, LLCpublic domain
Case: 20-1441 Document: 89 Page: 1 Filed: 10/13/2021 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ MOBILITY WORKX, LLC, Appellant v. UNIFIED PATENTS, LLC, Appellee ANDREW HIRSHFELD, PERFORMING THE FUNCTIONS AND DUTIES OF THE UNDER SECRETARY OF COMMERCE FOR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND DIRECTOR OF THE UNITE
Wendy Dolin v. GlaxoSmithKline LLCpublic domain
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 19-2547 WENDY B. DOLIN, Individually and as Independent Executor of the Estate of STEWART DOLIN, Deceased, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC, Formerly Known as SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee.
Wendy Dolin v. GlaxoSmithKline LLCpublic domain
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 19-2547 WENDY B. DOLIN, Individually and as Independent Executor of the Estate of STEWART DOLIN, Deceased, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC, Formerly Known as SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee.
Wendy Dolin v. GlaxoSmithKline LLCpublic domain
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 19-2547 WENDY B. DOLIN, Individually and as Independent Executor of the Estate of STEWART DOLIN, Deceased, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC, Formerly Known as SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee.
Veterans4you LLC v. United Statespublic domain
Case: 20-1175 Document: 48 Page: 1 Filed: 01/11/2021 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ VETERANS4YOU LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee ______________________ 2020-1175 ______________________ Appeal from the United
Invt Spe LLC v. Itcpublic domain
Case: 20-1903 Document: 98 Page: 1 Filed: 08/31/2022 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ INVT SPE LLC, Appellant v. INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION, Appellee HTC AMERICA, INC., HTC CORPORATION, Intervenors ______________________ 2020-1903 __
Invt Spe LLC v. Itcpublic domain
Case: 20-1903 Document: 98 Page: 1 Filed: 08/31/2022 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ INVT SPE LLC, Appellant v. INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION, Appellee HTC AMERICA, INC., HTC CORPORATION, Intervenors ______________________ 2020-1903 __
Great Concepts, LLC v. Chutter, Inc.public domain
Case: 22-1212 Document: 65 Page: 1 Filed: 01/10/2024 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ GREAT CONCEPTS, LLC, Appellant v. CHUTTER, INC., Appellee KATHERINE K. VIDAL, UNDER SECRETARY OF COMMERCE FOR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND DIRECTOR OF THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE,
Optis Wireless Technology, LLC v. Apple Inc.public domain
Case: 22-1925 Document: 3 Page: 1 Filed: 06/16/2025 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ OPTIS CELLULAR TECHNOLOGY, LLC, OPTIS WIRELESS TECHNOLOGY, LLC, PANOPTIS PATENT MANAGEMENT, LLC, UNWIRED PLANET INTERNATIONAL LIMITED, UNWIRED PLANET, LLC, Plaintiffs-Cross-Appellants v. APPLE INC., Defendant-Appellant
Great Concepts, LLC v. Chutter, Inc.public domain
Case: 22-1212 Document: 55 Page: 1 Filed: 10/18/2023 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ GREAT CONCEPTS, LLC, Appellant v. CHUTTER, INC., Appellee KATHERINE K. VIDAL, UNDER SECRETARY OF COMMERCE FOR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND DIRECTOR OF THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE,
Hard Candy, LLC v. Hard Candy Fitness, LLCpublic domain
ORDER CECILIA M. ALTONAGA, District Judge. THIS CAUSE came before the Court on Specially Appearing Defendants, MGHCandy, LLC (“MGHCandy”), Guy Oseary (“Oseary”), and Madonna Louise Ciccone’s (“Ciecone[’s]” or “Madonna[’s]”) (collectively, the “New Defendants^]”) Second Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction, or in the Alternative to Transfer to Northern (or Central) District of Cal
Nickel v. Brenton, LLCpublic domain
MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER MAE A. D’AGOSTINO, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION On May 28, 2013, Plaintiffs commenced this action in New York State Supreme Court, in Schenectady County. See Dkt. No. 14-5. In the complaint, Plaintiffs asserts a claim of breach of contract based on Defendants’ failure to pay Plaintiffs a commission due on the Chobani Project. See id. In th
303 Creative LLC v. Elenispublic domain
(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2022 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit
303 Creative LLC v. Elenispublic domain
PRELIMINARY PRINT Volume 600 U. S. Part 1 Pages 570–640 OFFICIAL REPORTS OF THE SUPREME COURT June 30, 2023 Page Proof Pending Publication REBECCA A. WOMELDORF reporter of decisions NOTICE: This preliminary print is subject to formal revision before the bound volume is published. Users are requ