Cases

Case: 23-1674 Document: 68 Page: 1 Filed: 06/16/2025 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ ANCORA TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Appellant v. ROKU, INC., VIZIO, INC., NINTENDO CO., LTD., NINTENDO OF AMERICA INC., Appellees ______________________ 2023-1674, 2023-1701 ___________

Case: 22-1386 Document: 70 Page: 1 Filed: 01/19/2024 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ ROKU, INC., Appellant v. INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION, Appellee UNIVERSAL ELECTRONICS, INC., Intervenor ______________________ 2022-1386 ___

Case: 22-1058 Document: 40 Page: 1 Filed: 03/31/2023 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ ROKU, INC., Appellant v. UNIVERSAL ELECTRONICS, INC., Appellee ______________________ 2022-1058 ______________________ Appeal from the United States Patent and

ACCEPTED 15-25-00001-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 3/7/2025 1:17 PM No. 15-25-00

Case: 23-1512 Document: 61 Page: 1 Filed: 03/07/2025 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ ALIVECOR, INC., Appellant v. APPLE INC., Appellee ______________________ 2023-1512, 2023-1513, 2023-1514 ______________________ Appeals from the United States

ANDRÉ BIROTTE JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE *711Before the Court is a Motion for Summary Judgment on Liability ("Motion," Dkt. No. 248) filed by Plaintiffs Disney Enterprises, Inc., Lucasfilm Ltd. LLC, Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation, and Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc. ("Plaintiffs"). Defendant VidAngel, Inc. ("VidAngel") filed

23‐7597‐cv Detrina Solomon v. Flipps Media, Inc. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term 2023 (Argued: May 13, 2024 Decided: May 1, 2025) Docket No. 23‐7597‐cv DETRINA SOLOMON, on behalf of herself and all others similarly

Case: 22-1340 Document: 50 Page: 1 Filed: 10/16/2023 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ COREPHOTONICS, LTD., Appellant v. APPLE INC., Appellee ______________________ 2022-1340, 2022-1341 ______________________ Appeals from

OPINION HURWITZ, Circuit Judge: VidAngel, Inc. operates an online streaming service that removes objectionable content from movies and television shows. VidAngel purchases physical discs containing copyrighted movies and television shows, decrypts the discs to “rip” a digital copy to a computer, and then streams to its customers a filtered version of the

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION HONORABLE ANDRÉ BIROTTE JR., UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE Pending before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Disney Enterprises, Inc., Lucasfilm Ltd. LLC, Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation, and Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc. (“Plaintiffs”) Motion for Preliminary Injunction. (“Mot.” Dkt. No. 26-1.) Plaintiffs seek to enjoin Defendant VidAngel

Case: 23-1397 Document: 45 Page: 1 Filed: 02/06/2025 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ HD SILICON SOLUTIONS LLC, Appellant v. MICROCHIP TECHNOLOGY INC., Appellee ______________________ 2023-1397 ______________________ Appeal from the United States Patent a

Case: 20-135 Document: 55 Page: 1 Filed: 11/09/2020 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ IN RE: APPLE INC., Petitioner ______________________ 2020-135 ______________________ On Petition for Writ of Mandamus to the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas in No. 6:19- cv-00532-ADA, Ju

Case: 21-2063 Document: 73 Page: 1 Filed: 08/16/2023 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ INCEPT LLC, Appellant v. PALETTE LIFE SCIENCES, INC., Appellee KATHERINE K. VIDAL, UNDER SECRETARY OF COMMERCE FOR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND DIRECTOR OF THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE,

Case: 21-2063 Document: 73 Page: 1 Filed: 08/16/2023 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ INCEPT LLC, Appellant v. PALETTE LIFE SCIENCES, INC., Appellee KATHERINE K. VIDAL, UNDER SECRETARY OF COMMERCE FOR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND DIRECTOR OF THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE,

USCA11 Case: 19-13285 Date Filed: 06/28/2022 Page: 1 of 46 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 19-13285 ____________________ WREAL, LLC, a Florida limited liability company, Plaintiff-Appellant,

USCA11 Case: 19-13285 Date Filed: 06/28/2022 Page: 1 of 46 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 19-13285 ____________________ WREAL, LLC, a Florida limited liability company, Plaintiff-Appellant,

Case: 24-1285 Document: 107 Page: 1 Filed: 03/19/2026 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ APPLE INC., Appellant v. INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION, Appellee MASIMO CORPORATION, CERCACOR LABORATORIES, INC., Intervenors ______________________

OPINION GRABER, Circuit Judge: Plaintiff Chad Eichenberger alleges that Defendant ESPN, Inc. violated the Video Privacy Protection Act of 1988 (“VPPA”), which bars a “video tape service provider” from knowingly disclosing “personally identifiable information concerning any consumer of such provider.” 18 U.S.C. § 2710(b

In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 16-783C Filed: August 23, 2019 Redacted Version Issued for Publication: September 24, 20191 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** * BRUHN NEWTECH, INC., et al., * * Plaintiffs, * Liability Trial; Contract Disputes Act;

*137 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS SAYLOR, District Judge. This is a putative class action arising out of the Video Privacy Protection Act (“VPPA”), 18 U.S.C. § 2710. The VPPA, among other things, prohibits the disclosure of “personally identifiable information” of certain consumers of video services. Plaintiff Alexa