Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “A. v. Doe Run Resources Corporation”
Reid v. Doe Run Resources Corp.public domain
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER CATHERINE D. PERRY, District Judge. Pending before me is the defendants’ motion for a determination of foreign law pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 44.1. The defendants have requested that the court determine that: (1) the plaintiffs’ claims “originated” in Peru and. are “fully barred” under Peruvian law so that, in accordance with Missouri’s borrowing statute, P
A.O.A. v. Doe Run Resources Corp.public domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION CATHERINE D. PERRY, District Judge. Plaintiffs are numerous Peruvian children who allege that they have been injured by exposure to toxic substances from the La Oroya Complex, a metallurgical smelting and refining complex operating in La Oroya, Peru. Through their next friends, they filed these eleven actions in Missouri state court, alleging state tort claims against the American co
J.Y.C.C. v. Doe Run Resources, Corp.public domain
RODNEY W. SIPPEL, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Plaintiffs in this matter are more than sixteen hundred Peruvian children who live near Defendants' lead smelter in La Oroya, Peru.1 Plaintiffs allege that they were injured after being exposed to toxic lead emissions from the smelter. The corporate defendants are United States companies, who through their Peruvian subsidiary, owned and operated the lead sme
J.Y.C.C. v. Doe Run Resources, Corp.public domain
RODNEY W. SIPPEL, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Plaintiffs in this matter are more than sixteen hundred Peruvian children who live near Defendants' lead smelter in La *1036Oroya, Peru. Plaintiffs allege that they were injured after being exposed to toxic lead emissions from the smelter. The corporate defendants are United States companies, wh
Mary R. Russell, Judge The Doe Run Resources Corporation was sued by several minor plaintiffs allegedly injured by toxic pollution released from Doe Run’s smelting facility in La Oroya, Peru. Doe Run sued its insurer, St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company, for reimbursement of defense costs incurred during the litigation of these claims. St. Paul denied any duty to defend Doe Run, alleging covera
Sr. Kate Reid v. Doe Run Resources Corp.public domain
BENTON, Circuit Judge. Doe Run Resources and its affiliates operated a smelting facility in Peru. The facility’s pollution allegedly injured the plaintiffs. A Doe Run associate, Renco, is currently arbitrating related claims with Peru. The defendants sought both a mandatory and discretionary stay of this case pending the outcome of the arbitration. The district court
Chris Collins v. Doe Run Resources Corporationpublic domain
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 22-1848 ___________________________ Chris Collins, as Next Friend of: J.Y.C.C.; I.K.C.C.; E.A.C.C.; E.L.C.C.; A.R.C.C.; J.R.G.; F.R.A.; R.F.R.C.; S.S.L.; R.D.L.C.; G.N.A.A.; H.G.A.L.; A.X.E.A.; M.Z.A.B.; A.Y.A.G.; I.D.A.A.; J.D.A.E.; Y.D.T.; E.J.D.L.C.D.; N.G.C.V.; Y.G.C.F.; C.P
State Ex Rel. Doe Run Resources Corp. v. Neillpublic domain
RICHARD B. TEITELMAN, Judge. Relators Doe Run Resources Corporation, et al., seek a writ of prohibition barring Respondent from taking any further action other than transferring the underlying case to a proper venue. Relators argue that defendant Marvin Kaiser, the chief financial officer (CFO) of Doe Run *504and a resident of the City of St. Louis at the tim
Sr. Kate Reid v. Doe Run Resources Corp.public domain
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 23-1625 ___________________________ Sr. Kate Reid; Megan Heeney, as next friends of; A. O. A.; Meylith A. Caso Arroyo; Y. C. A.; A. C. C.; D. R. G.; J. R. G.; S. A. L.; Jean P. Quispe Morales; B. Q. M. Pla
In Division RICK PARKER, Assessor Reynolds ) County, Missouri, ) ) Appellant, ) ) No. SD38539 vs. ) ) FILED: January 30, 2025 THE DOE RUN RESOURCES ) CORPORATION,
Sr. Kate Reid v. Doe Run Resources Corp.public domain
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 23-1625 ___________________________ Sr. Kate Reid; Megan Heeney, as next friends of; A. O. A.; Meylith A. Caso Arroyo; Y. C. A.; A. C. C.; D. R. G.; J. R. G.; S. A. L.; Jean P. Quispe Morales; B. Q. M. Pla
282 F.Supp.2d 1131 (2003) HOMESTAKE LEAD COMPANY OF MISSOURI, Plaintiff, v. DOE RUN RESOURCES CORPORATION, and Does 1-10, Defendants. No. C 03-0326 MHP. United States District Court, N.D. California. September 15, 2003. *1132 *1133 James Thompson Hendrick, William Curtis Rogers, Thelen Reid &a;
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 21-3046 ___________________________ Doe Run Resources Corporation Plaintiff - Appellant v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Company
LOKEN, Circuit Judge. Doe Run Resources Corporation (“Doe Run”), the largest integrated lead producer in the Western Hemisphere, operates the Sweetwater Mine and Mill near Viburnum, Missouri. Doe Run extracts and crushes ore containing lead and other metals at the mine, processes the crushed ore at a mill near the mine, and either sells the resulting lead concentrate on the world
J.Y.C.C. v. Doe Run Resources, Corp.public domain
RODNEY W. SIPPEL, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Plaintiffs in this matter are more than sixteen hundred Peruvian children who live near Defendants' lead smelter in La Oroya, Peru. Plaintiffs allege that they were injured after being exposed to toxic lead emissions from the smelter. The corporate defendants are United States companies, who through their Peruvian subsidiary, owned and operated the lead smelting and refining complex. Th
USCA11 Case: 24-13266 Document: 91-1 Date Filed: 01/21/2026 Page: 1 of 21 FOR PUBLICATION In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 24-13266 ____________________ In re: THE RENCO GROUP INC. AND THE DOE RUN RESOURCES CORPORATION. __
JUDGMENT This petition for review was considered on the record from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), on the briefs filed by the parties, and on their motions to govern future proceedings. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2); D.C.Cir. R. 34(j). The court has accorded the issues full consideration and has determined that they do not warrant a published opinion. See D.C.Cir. R. 36(d). It is. O
Parker v. Doe Run Co.public domain
PER CURIAM. Rick Parker, the Assessor for Reynolds County ("Assessor"), appeals from the findings of the State Tax Commission ("the Commission") regarding the valuation of real property in Reynolds County.1 The Commission found that the fair market value on January 1, 2011, of a part of Taxpayer's real property in Reynolds County was $105,600,000 for property tax purposes. Assessor brings five points cla
LOKEN, Circuit Judge. Doe Run Resources Corporation (“Doe Run”), the largest integrated lead producer in the Western Hemisphere, operates facilities near Leadwood, Missouri, that extract and crush ore containing lead and other metals and process the crushed ore to separate out lead concentrate that Doe Run sells on the world market or transports to its smelters for further process
Hartford Acc. and Indem. v. Doe Run Resourcespublic domain
663 F.Supp.2d 771 (2009) HARTFORD ACCIDENT AND INDEMNITY COMPANY, et al., Plaintiffs, v. The DOE RUN RESOURCES CORPORATION, et al., Defendants. No. 4:08-CV-1687 CAS. United States District Court, E.D. Missouri, Eastern Division. October 2, 2009. *773 James P. Ruggeri, Joshua D. Weinberg, Hogan & Hartson LLP, Washington, DC, M