Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “A'GACI, L.L.C.”
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART EEOC’S APPLICATION TO ENFORCE ADMINISTRATIVE SUBPOENA DAVID-ALAN EZRA, Senior District Judge. Before the Court is an Application to Enforce Administrative Subpoena filed by Applicant the Equal Employment Oppor*544tunity Commission (“EEOC”). (Dkt. # 1.) Pursuant to Local Rule 7(h), the Court find
POSNER, Circuit Judge. Marjorie Hofslien appeals from the district court’s refusal to disturb the decision by an administrative law judge denying her application for social security disability benefits. Her principal ground of appeal is that the administrative law judge misapplied the “treating physician” rulé; her other grounds are of no general significance and are disposed of i
In re Shahpublic domain
DECISION AND ORDER G. Michael Halfenger, United States Bankruptcy Judge On March 2, 2015, I denied a reconsideration motion filed by Aman Deep Singh, Baljeet Kaur and Dimple Kaur (collectively, the “creditors”). CM-ECF Doc. No. 39. Singh never received notice of the March 2 order because clerk personnel mailed it to the creditors’ former counsel— despite the fact that other court documents had been mailed
Justin v. STAR SERVICE, INC.public domain
987 So.2d 413 (2008) Clifton JUSTIN, Jr. v. STAR SERVICE, INC., and/or Star LLC, St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Company, Gary Bloomer and Bobby Bryant. No. 07-CA-998. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fifth Circuit. June 19, 2008. Rehearing Denied July 8, 2008. *414 Benjamin J. Birdsall, Jr., Derek D. Gambino,
Trinidad v. McCaughtrypublic domain
Order Samuel Trinidad, who is imprisoned in Wisconsin, contends (among other things) that the prison imposed sanctions for a prayer he included in a letter sent to another prisoner. The district court dismissed the complaint, before service of process was made on defendants, under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. On a prior appeal we reversed with respect to this aspect of Trinidad’s claim. Although the prison apparently believes that the language
Christopher Mills v. Statepublic domain
NO. 07-08-0348-CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AMARILLO PANEL D OCTOBER 14, 2009 ______________________________ CHRISTOPHER MILLS, APPELLANT V.
MEMORANDUM OPINION JEFF ROSE, Justice. Allen Chadwick Burbage (“Chad”) appeals a judgment and permanent injunction entered in favor of W. Kirk Burbage and the Burbage Funeral Home (collectively, “Kirk”). Kirk sued his brother Chad for defamation on the basis of statements Chad made on a website and in letters to third parties. A jury awarded
Price, Don Earl v. Statepublic domain
Affirmed as Modified; Opinion Filed March 14, 2013. In The tntrt uf Aipiati FiftI! iatrict tif xas at Datkui No. 05-1 2-00160-CR No. 05-12-00161-CR No. 05-12-00162-CR DON EARL PRICE, Appellant V.
Andre Demont Thompson v. Statepublic domain
ACCEPTED 01-14-00862-CR FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 7/31/2015 7:17:22 PM CHRISTOPHER PRINE
United States v. Poolepublic domain
GORSUCH, Circuit Judge. John Poole appeals his conviction for assault resulting in serious bodily injury on the basis that the jury’s verdict was impermissibly ambiguous. Mr. Poole points to the fact that, in addition to finding him guilty of assault resulting in serious bodily injury, the jury proceeded to find him guilty of the lesser included offense of simple assault — and d
State v. Jordanpublic domain
MADELEINE M. LANDRIEU, Judge. _JjThe defendant, Vincent Jordan, appeals his conviction of possession of cocaine and his sentence of four years imprisonment at hard labor. For the reasons that follow, we affirm. STATEMENT OF CASE On February 14, 2012, the State filed a bill of information charging Mr. Jordan with one count of possession of cocaine, a violation of La. R.S. 40:967(0(2).
People v. Smithpublic domain
FIFTH DIVISION March 30, 2007 No. 1-04-2656 THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, ) Appeal from the ) Circuit Court of Plaintiff-Appellee, ) Cook County
Joseph Mark Daigle v. Statepublic domain
NO. 07-07-00264-CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AMARILLO PANEL D ----------------------------------------------------
People v. Smithpublic domain
865 N.E.2d 502 (2007) The PEOPLE of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Lyndon SMITH, Defendant-Appellant. No. 1-04-2656. Appellate Court of Illinois, First District, Fifth Division. March 30, 2007. Rehearing Denied April 19, 2007. *503 Office of the State Appellate Defender, Chicago (Michael J. Pelleti
Chaka L. Pratt v. Statepublic domain
NO. 07-04-0335-CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AMARILLO PANEL D JUNE 8, 2005 ______________________________ CHAKA L. PRATT, APPELLANT
Patricia A. Luna v. United Statespublic domain
SYKES, Circuit Judge. Patricia Luna injured herself at the Great Lakes Naval Base, where she worked as an instructor under a contract between the Navy and a private contractor. She sued the United States under the Federal Tort Claims Act (“FTCA”), which provides a remedy for personal injuries caused by negligent acts of governmental employees acting within the scope of their emp
30 F.3d 907 Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,349Terrence DONOHOE, Bernard Medville, Clarence Drucker, etal., Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.CONSOLIDATED OPERATING & PRODUCTION CORPORATION, C. MorandoBerrettini and Jack Nortman, Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-3610. United States Court of Appeals,Seventh Circuit. Argued April 13, 1994.Decided July 28, 1994.
United States v. Bernard Watsonpublic domain
BAUER, Circuit Judge. The government appeals the district court’s pre-trial suppression of a number of Bernard Watson’s incriminating written and oral statements. Because we hold that the district court denied the government a fair suppression hearing, we reverse and remand for a new hearing. Initially, we need to clarify what is not at issue in this
County of Cook v. Wells Fargo & Co.public domain
Memorandum Opinion and Order Gary Scott Feinerman, United States District Judge County of'Cook, Illinois, alleges in this lawsuit that Wells Fargo & Co., Wells Fargo Financial, Inc., Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., and 375 unnamed Wells Fargo entities (collectively, “Wells Fargo”) issued predatory subprime mortgage loans that over the years went into default and drove the mortgaged properties into for
Gonzales v. Statepublic domain
JOHNSON, J., dissenting. Our concern ought not be for those who are not selected for the jury, but for those who are. See, e.g., Jones v. State, 982 S.W.2d 386, 394 (courts should liberally grant challenges for cause: “The venire comprises so many jurors who are clearly qualified that it is unnecessary to err by denying a challenge for cause on a close question.”); see also Morgan v. Illinois,