Cases

In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 21-856 Filed: April 14, 2021 Reissued: April 19, 2021 * DARTON INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant, and MILSUP LLC, Defendant-Intervenor. Michelle F. Kantor, McDonald Hopkins LLC, Chicago, IL, and Mary F.

CORRECTED In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 21-856 Filed: April 14, 2021 Reissued: April 19, 2021 * DARTON INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant, and MILSUP LLC, Defendant-Intervenor. Michelle F. Ka

Supreme Court of Texas ══════════ No. 21-0769 ══════════ Angela Horton and Kevin Houser, Petitioners, v. The Kansas City Southern Railway Company, Respondent ═══════════════════════════════════════ On Petition for Review from the Court of Appeals fo

Opinion issued August 11, 2015 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-13-00856-CV ——————————— POWER REPS, INC., BOB BERGIN, AND JEFF JACQUIN, Appellants / Cross-Appellees V.

40 P.3d 343 (2001) 307 Mont. 499 2001 MT 306 Leon E. LANGEMEIER and Marilyn K. Langemeier and First American Title Insurance Company, Petitioners and Respondents, v. James R. KUEHL and Robert F. Kuehl, Respondents and Appellants. No. 00-856. Supreme Court of Montana. Submitted on Briefs September 27, 2001. Decided

MEMORANDUM OPINION JAMES E. BOASBERG, United States District Judge This dispute started with a Freedom of Information Act request by the American Immigration Council, an immigration law and policy group, seeking information about individuals’ access to counsel during their interactions with Immigration and Customs Enforcement. After the gover

Opinion issued October 29, 2009 In The Court of Appeals For The

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA PRATEEK DAVE, : : Plaintiff, : Civil Action No.: 08-0856 (RMU) : v. : Re Document No.: 12 : CATHY LANIER e

681 F.Supp.2d 68 (2010) Prateek DAVE, Plaintiff, v. Cathy LANIER et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 08-0856 (RMU). United States District Court, District of Columbia. February 3, 2010. *70 David A. Branch, Law Office of David A. Branch, Washington, DC, for Plaintiff. Dwayne C. Jefferson, D.C. Attorney General's Office, W

732 F.Supp.2d 693 (2010) Guadalupe BETANCOURT, Plaintiff, v. FEDERATED DEPARTMENT STORES, Defendant. Civil Action No. SA-09-CA-856-XR. United States District Court, W.D. Texas, San Antonio Division. August 10, 2010. *696 Pete Marlin Monismith, Thomas B. Bacon, P.A., Apollo, PA, for Plaintiff. Paul E. Hash, Rachel D. Ziolko

644 F.2d 1112 25 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. 1262,26 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 31,856 Joseph TERRELL, Walter Dudley, Thomas Green, Johnny Long,Albert Mason, Marcus Oakes, Sam Walker, on behalfof themselves and the class theyrepresent, Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.UNITED STATES PIPE & FOUNDRY CO. et al., Defendants,Local 2140, United Steelworkers Union Local 342,International Molders, Allied Workers Union, et

In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ____________

Tantillo v Cutrone (2025 NY Slip Op 03093) Tantillo v Cutrone 2025 NY Slip Op 03093 Decided on May 21, 2025 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. <

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 24a0136p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ BENJAMIN STANLEY, │ Plaintiff-Appellant,

*227 MEMORANDUM OPINION JAMES E. BOASBERG, District Judge. Plaintiff American Immigration Council brought this action under the Freedom of Information Act seeking records on immigrants’ access to legal counsel during their interactions with U.S. Immigration and Customs

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 368 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 369 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE N

U.S. Bank Trust, N.A. v Caputo (2022 NY Slip Op 02303) U.S. Bank Trust, N.A. v Caputo 2022 NY Slip Op 02303 Decided on April 6, 2022 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciar

200 F.3d 436 (6th Cir. 1999) Loral Defense Systems-Akron, Division of Loral Corporation; Aircraft Braking Systems Corporation, Petitioners/Cross-Respondents,v.National Labor Relations Board, Respondent/Cross-Petitioner,International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers of America (UAW); Local 856, International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace And Agricultural Implement Workers, Intervenors.

BIXLER v. FASSNACHT-BIXLER2022 OK CIV APP 28515 P.3d 856Case Number: 118841Decided: 05/06/2022Mandate Issued: 07/20/2022DIVISION IITHE COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA, DIVISION II Cite as: 2022 OK CIV APP 28, 515 P.3d 856 IN RE THE MARRIAGE OF: GENE BIXLER, Petitioner/A

503 P.3d 856The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado, Petitioner