Cases

J-A19019-23 2023 PA Super 218 LARRY SMITH AND KELLY SMITH, : IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF H/W : PENNSYLVANIA : Appellants : : : v. :

DOTY, District Judge. Terry and. Sheila Ellis appeal from the decision of the tax court 2 finding a deficiency in their 2005 income tax and imposing related penalties. Because we conclude that Mr. Ellis engaged in a prohibited transaction with respect to his individual retirement account (IRA), we affirm.

DIPLOMAT PROPERTY MANAGER, LLC vs. LOZANO, 102 Mass. App. Ct. 57 DIPLOMAT PROPERTY MANAGER, LLC vs. JAMES A. LOZANO & another. [Note 1] 102 Mass. App. Ct. 57 September 6, 2022 - December 30, 2022 Court Below: Housing Court, Central Division Present: Sullivan, Blake, & Grant, JJ. No. 21-P-690. Summary P

SERCOMBE, P. J. Petitioner, Innovative Design & Construction, LLC (Innovative Design), seeks judicial review of a final order of the Construction Contractors Board (CCB) finding that Innovative Design had committed 12 violations of ORS 701.098(1)(L) and imposing a $1,000 penalty for each of those violations. On review, Innovative Design raises five assignments of error. We reject without discussion its third and fourth ass

Peterson, Justice. *765**79The Dawsonville City Council voted to remove W. James Grogan as mayor in May 2017. Grogan sought review of the removal decision by filing a direct appeal and a petition for certiorari in the superior court. Grogan continued to serve

In the Supreme Court of Georgia Decided: February 4, 2019 S18A1425. GROGAN v. CITY OF DAWSONVILLE. PETERSON, Justice. The Dawsonville City Council voted to remove W. James Grogan as mayor in May 2017. Grogan sought review of the removal decision by filing a direct appeal and a petition for certiorari in the superior court. Grogan continued to serve as mayor pending the appeal, and the City then filed counterclaims aga

Filed 10/7/24 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION SEVEN KENNETH W. LATHROP et al., B331970 Plaintiffs and Appellants, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. 22NWCV01494) v. THOR MOTOR COACH, INC., et al., Defendants and Respondents. APPEAL from an order of the Superio

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER WEXLER, District Judge. Plaintiff John M. Ferolito (“Ferolito”) brings this diversity action against defendant David K. Menashi (“Menashi”) for fraud, breach of fiduciary duty, and breach of contract. Menashi moves under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 9(b), 12(b)(1), and 12(b)(6) to dismiss or stay this action. Ferolito opposes the motion. I. BACKG

OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS’ FOURTH AMENDED COMPLAINT (Dkt. 68) AND DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE MARK A. GOLDSMITH, United States District Judge Plaintiffs Kimberly Cox and Heather Claus initiated this putative class action under the Employment Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq„ alleging that Defendant Blue Cross Blue Shield of Mich

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2020-CA-00827-SCT BRITTANY SPIERS v. OAK GROVE CREDIT, LLC, COLUMBIA CREDIT, LLC AND PINE BELT CREDIT, LLC DATE OF JUDGMENT: 07/09/2020 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. PRENTISS GREENE HARRELL TRIAL COURT ATTORNEYS: DANIEL M. WAIDE STACEY MOORE BUCHANAN MARY MARGARET S

OPINION DOWD, District Judge. The parties in this case have been engaged for years in multiple lawsuits in multiple jurisdictions concerning trusts that were established by James Cartwright before his death. An understanding of both the background facts and litigation history is useful to understanding the issues presently before the court on appeal.

Blackwell, Justice. This case presents important questions about the doctrine of sovereign immunity and the constitutional guarantee of the freedom of speech. But before we can resolve those questions, we must consider our jurisdiction of this appeal. The case comes to us as an appeal of right. The appeal is taken, however, from a judgment of a superior court reviewing a decisio

ORDER DISMISSING AMENDED COMPLAINT B.J. JONES, Deputy Judge. ACTION The Plaintiffs—Elizabeth Sherman, Sandra Nichols, Vikki Howard, and Harry *463Greene—filed a civil petition with this Court seeking a permanent injunction against Defendant, Enbridge Energy, LLC (Enbridge), from constructing the proposed “Alberta Clipper Pipeline a

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE November 20, 2014 Session SYNOVUS BANK v. DAVID A. PACZKO, ET AL. Appeal from the Chancery Court for Williamson County No. 42540 Robbie T. Beal, Judge No. M2014-00897-COA-R3-CV – Filed May 29, 2015 Bank sued borrowers on a lost or destroyed promissory note. Borrowers, among other defenses, denied th

' FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW MATTHEW F. KENNELLY, District Judge: Ariel Investments, LLC sued Ariel Capital Advisors LLC, alleging trademark infringement, unfair competition, and cy-bersquatting in violation of the Lanham Act and unfair trade practices in violation of the Illinois Deceptive. Trade Practices Act and Illinois common law. Ariel Capital raised several affirmative defenses and ass

MEMORANDUM OPINION STARK, U.S. District Judge: I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Wendell E. Hall, Sr. (“Plaintiff”) filed this action against Defendant E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company (“Defendant”) alleging employment discrimination pursuant to Title VII of the CM Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VII”), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. (D.I. 2) The Court has jurisdictio

23-1147 Salazar v. NBA In the United States Court of Appeals For the Second Circuit August Term, 2023 (Argued: April 2, 2024 Decided: October 15, 2024) Docket No. 23-1147 MICHAEL SALAZAR, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED, Plaintif

FILED Oct 16 2023, 8:45 am CLERK Indiana Supreme Court Court of Appeals

KELLER, J. The named plaintiff, Shirley Papallo (plaintiff), held a 50 percent membership interest in Big Dog Entertainment, LLC (LLC). The LLC is the other plaintiff in this matter. The defendant, Ronald D. Lefebvre, held the other 50 percent membership interest. The LLC was in the sole business of operating a bar-Central Cafe-in Plainville. During the relevant time period, the defenda

ELIZABETH A. WOLFORD, United States District Judge INTRODUCTION This action is but one of many legal disputes currently pending between the *383parties, arising out of construction activities on property owned by Marist College ("Marist") in Poughkeepsie, New York. This dispute involves the contractua