Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “579 Decatur LLC”
Carol Wilkerson v. Grinnell Corporationpublic domain
COX, Circuit Judge: Carol Wilkerson sued Grinnell Corporation, asserting, inter alia, claims under Title VII. The district court granted summary judgment on her Title VII claims because she failed to file a timely charge of discrimination and harassment with the EEOC. Since we conclude that Wilkerson filed a timely EEOC charge, we vacate the
Ernest E. Dixon v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)public domain
MEMORANDUM DECISION Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be FILED regarded as precedent or cited before any Dec 23 2020, 9:34 am court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collateral CLERK Indiana Supreme Court
Spinner v. Cash in a Hurry, LLC (In Re Spinner)public domain
398 B.R. 84 (2008) In re Tarran M. SPINNER, Debtor. Tarran M. Spinner, Plaintiff, v. Cash In A Hurry, LLC, Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 06-71767-MGD. Adversary No. 06-6415-MGD. United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia, Atlanta Division. September 29, 2008. *87 Ralph Goldberg, Goldberg & Cuvillier, P.C., Decatur, GA. for
Sayers v. Artistic Kitchen Design, LLCpublic domain
633 S.E.2d 619 (2006) SAYERS et al. v. ARTISTIC KITCHEN DESIGN, LLC et al. No. A06A0570. Court of Appeals of Georgia. June 30, 2006. *620 Joseph Szczecko, Simmons & Szczecko, Decatur, for Appellants. Christopher D. Huskins, The Huskins Law Firm, Eatonton, for Appellees. PHIPPS, Judge. Timothy and Melissa
Rosenblat Properties, LLC v. Shweta Kohsmannpublic domain
ROSENBLAT PROPERTIES, * NO. 2024-CA-0216 LLC * VERSUS COURT OF APPEAL * SHWETA KOHSMANN FOURTH CIRCUIT * STATE OF LOUISIANA ******* APPEAL FROM
Crull v. Sriratanapublic domain
JUSTICE MYERSCOUGH, specially concurring in part and dissenting in part: I respectfully concur in part and dissent in part. I concur in the affirmance of the trial court but strenuously object to the ruminations of the majority attempting to override O’Casek and resurrect Cargill. However, I ag
Blair-Naughton, L.L.C. v. Diner Concepts, Inc.public domain
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER J. THOMAS MARTEN, District Judge. This matter is before the court on the defendants’ Motion to Exclude the proposed expert testimony of Thomas Blair and Gary Poore relating to the lost profits of the plaintiff. Blair has been in the restaurant business for seven years. He has operated a sports bar/restaurant in Benkleman, Nebraska and a hot dog stand in Colorado
ORDER LEIGH MARTIN MAY, District Judge. This is a disability discrimination action under Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. § 12132 et seq., and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (“RA”), 29 U.S.C. § 794 et seq. This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs Motion to Strike the Declaration of Dr. Jill Lee-Barber [55], Defendant’s M
Polansky v. Kellypublic domain
ORDER HERNDON, Chief Judge: This case arose out of a solo autocross1 accident which resulted in plaintiff Jordan Polansky being injured after being struck by the vehicle driven by defendant Michael Kelly while plaintiff was acting as a corner captain2 during Kelly’s course run in the parking lot of the Gateway International Raceway. As a
FOURTH DIVISION MERCIER, C. J., DILLARD, P. J., and LAND, J. NOTICE: Motions for reconsideration must be physically received in our clerk’s office within ten days of the date of decision to be deemed timely filed. https://www.gaappeals.us/rules
TJOFLAT, Circuit Judge: *1284 The directors of Buckhead Community Bank wanted to make Buckhead a "billion dollar bank." So, they set out to execute an aggressive growth strategy. To implement the growth strategy, the directors expanded the Bank's loan portfolio. Many of these loans faile
Chapman v. Statepublic domain
629 S.E.2d 220 (2006) 280 Ga. 560 CHAPMAN v. The STATE. No. S06A0450. Supreme Court of Georgia. April 25, 2006. Reconsideration Denied May 19, 2006. *221 James David Michael, Blend & Michael, LLC, Decatur, for Appellant. Gwendolyn Keyes Fleming, Dist. Atty., Barbara Blaine Conro
Moe's Franchisor, LLC v. Taylor Investment Partners II, LLC (In re Taylor Investment Partners II, LLC)public domain
CONTESTED MATTER ORDER ON STAY RELIEF MARGARET H. MURPHY, UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY JUDGE This case is before the Court on Movant’s Motion for Relief from Stay, filed February 23, 2015 (Doc. No. 44) (“Motion”). Movant asserts Debtors are legally barred from assuming their franchise agreements with Movant without Movant’s consent, and Movant withholds such consent; therefore, Movant
State v. Orrpublic domain
Nahmias, Presiding Justice. *894**729We granted a writ of certiorari in this case to determine whether Georgia's new Evidence Code abrogates the categorical rule this Court announced in Division 5 of Mallory v. State ,
In Re Application of County Collectorpublic domain
917 N.E.2d 574 (2009) 334 Ill.Dec. 748 In the Matter of the Application of the COUNTY COLLECTOR for judgment and order of sale against lands and lots returned delinquent for the nonpayment of general taxes for the year 2004, and Dennis D. Ballinger, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Pettit Land, LLC., Respondent-Appellee. No. 3-09-0134. Appellate Court of Illinois, Third District.
Fed. Deposit Ins. Corp. v. Loudermilkpublic domain
Warren, Justice. **558This case comes to us by way of three certified questions from the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. Given the lengthy history of this case, the facts are familiar to the federal courts and to ours. As the receiver of the Buckhead Community Bank, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) sued
Harris v. Statepublic domain
627 S.E.2d 562 (2006) 280 Ga. 372 HARRIS v. The STATE. No. S05A1519. Supreme Court of Georgia. March 13, 2006. Reconsideration Denied April 13, 2006. *563 James David Michael, Blend & Michael, LLC, Decatur, for appellant. Robert M. Coker, Asst. Dist. Atty., Gwendolyn Keyes Flemi
Bettis v. Hallpublic domain
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER JULIE A. ROBINSON, District Judge. Plaintiffs Tony Bettis, Eric Comeau, Steven Seat, and National Realty Capital, LLC (“NRC”) filed this action against Defendants Gary L. Hall, Bentley Investments of Nevada, LLC (“Bentley”), and the Gary L. Hall Revocable Trust (“Trust”) for breach of contract and quantum meruit. After the Court’s ruling on Defendants’ earlier dispositive m
Chang v. Statepublic domain
608 S.E.2d 283 (2004) 270 Ga. App. 814 CHANG v. The STATE. No. A04A2249. Court of Appeals of Georgia. December 8, 2004. *284 Wystan Getz, Oakhurst Law Group of Getz, LLC, Decatur, for Appellant. Daniel Porter, District Attorney, Brooke Langston, Gwinnett Cty. Dist. Attorney's Office, for Appellee.</
The City of Decatur, Illinois v. Ballingerpublic domain
ILLINOIS OFFICIAL REPORTS Appellate Court City of Decatur, Illinois v. Ballinger, 2013 IL App (4th) 120456 Appellate Court THE CITY OF DECATUR, ILLINOIS, a Municipal Corporation, Caption Plaintiff-Appellee, v. DENNIS BALLINGER, Defendant-Appellant, and JOSEPH E. ABBOTT; VIRGINIA S. ABBOTT; MACON COUNTY, as Trustee; and INTE