⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “579 Decatur LLC”

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2001-10-22 · Published · cited 292× · 270 F.3d 1314; 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 22604; 81 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 40,783; 89 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 579; 2001 WL 1262325
COX, Circuit Judge: Carol Wilkerson sued Grinnell Corporation, asserting, inter alia, claims under Title VII. The district court granted summary judgment on her Title VII claims because she failed to file a timely charge of discrimination and harassment with the EEOC. Since we conclude that Wilkerson filed a timely EEOC charge, we vacate the
Indiana Court of Appeals · 2020-12-23 · Published · cited 0×
MEMORANDUM DECISION Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be FILED regarded as precedent or cited before any Dec 23 2020, 9:34 am court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collateral CLERK Indiana Supreme Court
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia · 2008-09-29 · Published · cited 20× · 398 B.R. 84; 2008 Bankr. LEXIS 3620; 2008 WL 5205967
398 B.R. 84 (2008) In re Tarran M. SPINNER, Debtor. Tarran M. Spinner, Plaintiff, v. Cash In A Hurry, LLC, Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 06-71767-MGD. Adversary No. 06-6415-MGD. United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia, Atlanta Division. September 29, 2008. *87 Ralph Goldberg, Goldberg & Cuvillier, P.C., Decatur, GA. for
Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2006-06-30 · Published · cited 14× · 633 S.E.2d 619; 280 Ga. App. 223; 2006 Fulton County D. Rep. 2075; 2006 Ga. App. LEXIS 799
633 S.E.2d 619 (2006) SAYERS et al. v. ARTISTIC KITCHEN DESIGN, LLC et al. No. A06A0570. Court of Appeals of Georgia. June 30, 2006. *620 Joseph Szczecko, Simmons & Szczecko, Decatur, for Appellants. Christopher D. Huskins, The Huskins Law Firm, Eatonton, for Appellees. PHIPPS, Judge. Timothy and Melissa
Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2024-11-26 · Published · cited 0×
ROSENBLAT PROPERTIES, * NO. 2024-CA-0216 LLC * VERSUS COURT OF APPEAL * SHWETA KOHSMANN FOURTH CIRCUIT * STATE OF LOUISIANA ******* APPEAL FROM
Crull v. Sriratanapublic domain
Appellate Court of Illinois · 2007-10-11 · Published · cited 4× · 878 N.E.2d 753; 376 Ill. App. 3d 803
JUSTICE MYERSCOUGH, specially concurring in part and dissenting in part: I respectfully concur in part and dissent in part. I concur in the affirmance of the trial court but strenuously object to the ruminations of the majority attempting to override O’Casek and resurrect Cargill. However, I ag
District Court, D. Kansas · 2008-07-17 · Published · cited 0× · 568 F. Supp. 2d 1261; 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 55004; 2008 WL 2780879
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER J. THOMAS MARTEN, District Judge. This matter is before the court on the defendants’ Motion to Exclude the proposed expert testimony of Thomas Blair and Gary Poore relating to the lost profits of the plaintiff. Blair has been in the restaurant business for seven years. He has operated a sports bar/restaurant in Benkleman, Nebraska and a hot dog stand in Colorado
District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2015-02-27 · Published · cited 4× · 114 F. Supp. 3d 1260; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 93711; 2015 WL 4306858
ORDER LEIGH MARTIN MAY, District Judge. This is a disability discrimination action under Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. § 12132 et seq., and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (“RA”), 29 U.S.C. § 794 et seq. This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs Motion to Strike the Declaration of Dr. Jill Lee-Barber [55], Defendant’s M
Polansky v. Kellypublic domain
District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2012-03-06 · Published · cited 0× · 856 F. Supp. 2d 962; 2012 WL 733881; 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 29169
ORDER HERNDON, Chief Judge: This case arose out of a solo autocross1 accident which resulted in plaintiff Jordan Polansky being injured after being struck by the vehicle driven by defendant Michael Kelly while plaintiff was acting as a corner captain2 during Kelly’s course run in the parking lot of the Gateway International Raceway. As a
Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2025-05-06 · Published · cited 0×
FOURTH DIVISION MERCIER, C. J., DILLARD, P. J., and LAND, J. NOTICE: Motions for reconsideration must be physically received in our clerk’s office within ten days of the date of decision to be deemed timely filed. https://www.gaappeals.us/rules
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2019-07-22 · Published · cited 3× · 930 F.3d 1280
TJOFLAT, Circuit Judge: *1284 The directors of Buckhead Community Bank wanted to make Buckhead a "billion dollar bank." So, they set out to execute an aggressive growth strategy. To implement the growth strategy, the directors expanded the Bank's loan portfolio. Many of these loans faile
Chapman v. Statepublic domain
Supreme Court of Georgia · 2006-04-25 · Published · cited 10× · 629 S.E.2d 220; 280 Ga. 560; 2006 Fulton County D. Rep. 1365; 2006 Ga. LEXIS 252
629 S.E.2d 220 (2006) 280 Ga. 560 CHAPMAN v. The STATE. No. S06A0450. Supreme Court of Georgia. April 25, 2006. Reconsideration Denied May 19, 2006. *221 James David Michael, Blend & Michael, LLC, Decatur, for Appellant. Gwendolyn Keyes Fleming, Dist. Atty., Barbara Blaine Conro
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia · 2015-06-30 · Published · cited 0× · 533 B.R. 837
CONTESTED MATTER ORDER ON STAY RELIEF MARGARET H. MURPHY, UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY JUDGE This case is before the Court on Movant’s Motion for Relief from Stay, filed February 23, 2015 (Doc. No. 44) (“Motion”). Movant asserts Debtors are legally barred from assuming their franchise agreements with Movant without Movant’s consent, and Movant withholds such consent; therefore, Movant
State v. Orrpublic domain
Supreme Court of Georgia · 2019-05-06 · Published · cited 86× · 827 S.E.2d 892; 305 Ga. 729
Nahmias, Presiding Justice. *894**729We granted a writ of certiorari in this case to determine whether Georgia's new Evidence Code abrogates the categorical rule this Court announced in Division 5 of Mallory v. State ,
Appellate Court of Illinois · 2009-10-15 · Published · cited 1× · 917 N.E.2d 574; 334 Ill. Dec. 748; 395 Ill. App. 3d 155
917 N.E.2d 574 (2009) 334 Ill.Dec. 748 In the Matter of the Application of the COUNTY COLLECTOR for judgment and order of sale against lands and lots returned delinquent for the nonpayment of general taxes for the year 2004, and Dennis D. Ballinger, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Pettit Land, LLC., Respondent-Appellee. No. 3-09-0134. Appellate Court of Illinois, Third District.
Supreme Court of Georgia · 2019-03-13 · Published · cited 40× · 826 S.E.2d 116; 305 Ga. 558
Warren, Justice. **558This case comes to us by way of three certified questions from the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. Given the lengthy history of this case, the facts are familiar to the federal courts and to ours. As the receiver of the Buckhead Community Bank, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) sued
Harris v. Statepublic domain
Supreme Court of Georgia · 2006-03-13 · Published · cited 18× · 627 S.E.2d 562; 280 Ga. 372; 2006 Fulton County D. Rep. 732; 2006 Ga. LEXIS 168
627 S.E.2d 562 (2006) 280 Ga. 372 HARRIS v. The STATE. No. S05A1519. Supreme Court of Georgia. March 13, 2006. Reconsideration Denied April 13, 2006. *563 James David Michael, Blend & Michael, LLC, Decatur, for appellant. Robert M. Coker, Asst. Dist. Atty., Gwendolyn Keyes Flemi
Bettis v. Hallpublic domain
District Court, D. Kansas · 2012-02-14 · Published · cited 0× · 852 F. Supp. 2d 1325; 2012 WL 487044; 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17997
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER JULIE A. ROBINSON, District Judge. Plaintiffs Tony Bettis, Eric Comeau, Steven Seat, and National Realty Capital, LLC (“NRC”) filed this action against Defendants Gary L. Hall, Bentley Investments of Nevada, LLC (“Bentley”), and the Gary L. Hall Revocable Trust (“Trust”) for breach of contract and quantum meruit. After the Court’s ruling on Defendants’ earlier dispositive m
Chang v. Statepublic domain
Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2004-12-08 · Published · cited 10× · 608 S.E.2d 283; 270 Ga. App. 814; 2004 Ga. App. LEXIS 1604
608 S.E.2d 283 (2004) 270 Ga. App. 814 CHANG v. The STATE. No. A04A2249. Court of Appeals of Georgia. December 8, 2004. *284 Wystan Getz, Oakhurst Law Group of Getz, LLC, Decatur, for Appellant. Daniel Porter, District Attorney, Brooke Langston, Gwinnett Cty. Dist. Attorney's Office, for Appellee.</
Appellate Court of Illinois · 2013-04-16 · Published · cited 1× · 2013 IL App (4th) 120456; 988 N.E.2d 737
ILLINOIS OFFICIAL REPORTS Appellate Court City of Decatur, Illinois v. Ballinger, 2013 IL App (4th) 120456 Appellate Court THE CITY OF DECATUR, ILLINOIS, a Municipal Corporation, Caption Plaintiff-Appellee, v. DENNIS BALLINGER, Defendant-Appellant, and JOSEPH E. ABBOTT; VIRGINIA S. ABBOTT; MACON COUNTY, as Trustee; and INTE