⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “579 Chester St LLC”

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2020-09-15 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Matthew Scot Payne, : Petitioner : : v. : No. 579 C.D. 2019 : ARGUED: December 12, 2019 Pennsylvania Department of Health, : Respondent : BEFORE: HONORABLE PATRICIA A. Mc
State v. D. J. M.public domain
Oregon Supreme Court · 2020-04-09 · Published · cited 25× · 366 Or. 292
292 PETITIONS FOR REVIEW (460 P3d 1011-1017, 461 P3d 221-222) ALLOWED April 9, 2020 De Young v. Brown (A162584)(S067385)(300 Or App 530) State v. Postlethwait, William Anthony (A167015)(S067153)(300 Or App 217) Appellant’s petition for review is allowed. The decision of the Court of Appeals is vacated, and this case is remanded to the Court of
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009-09-17 · Published · cited 15× · 581 F.3d 313; 47 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2419; 187 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2016; 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 20630; 2009 WL 2958441
581 F.3d 313 (2009) TRUSTEES OF the DETROIT CARPENTERS FRINGE BENEFIT FUNDS, Plaintiffs-Appellants/Cross-Appellees, v. INDUSTRIAL CONTRACTING, LLC, a Michigan limited liability company, and LASALLE GROUP, INC., a Michigan corporation, Defendants-Appellees/Cross-Appellants. Nos. 08-1457, 08-1994. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Argued: March 11, 2009.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009-09-17 · Published · cited 0×
RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 206 File Name: 09a0335p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT _________________ X - TRUSTEES OF THE DETROIT CARPENTERS Plaintiffs-
Court of Appeals of Washington · 2013-12-23 · Published · cited 16× · 178 Wash. App. 550; 315 P.3d 579
Lau, J. ¶1 When a claim against an estate in probate is rejected by certified mail, RCW 11.40.100(1) requires the claimant to file suit against the estate within 30 days after the postmark date. Because Teresa Vaux-Michel failed to file suit against T. Mark Stover’s estate within 30 days after the postmark on her rejected claim, and because CR 6 does not apply to extend this time limitation, we reverse and remand to the trial co
Court of Appeals of Virginia · 2024-06-25 · Published · cited 0×
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA Present: Judges Beales, Callins and Senior Judge Clements PUBLISHED Argued at Richmond, Virginia LAYLA H. by her next friend MARIA HUSSAINZADAH, ET AL. OPINION BY v. Record No. 1639-22-2 JUDGE RANDOLPH A. BEALES
District Court, D. Delaware · 2016-08-11 · Published · cited 1× · 201 F. Supp. 3d 473; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 108015; 2016 WL 4394140
MEMORANDUM OPINION ANDREWS, United States District Judge Plaintiff Connie L. Crenshaw, who appears pro se, filed this action, alleging employment sex discrimination and retaliation under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e, et seq. (D.I. 2). The Court has jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331. Defendant Diamond State Port Corporation moves for summa
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018-06-20 · Published · cited 2× · 250 So. 3d 210
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellant, )
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2019-12-26 · Published · cited 1× · 2019 Ohio 5354
[Cite as Stoner v. Salon Lofts, L.L.C., 2019-Ohio-5354.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT Sean A. Stoner, : No. 19AP-262 Plaintiff-Appellee, : (C.P.C. No. 10CV-13904) and v.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2023-03-23 · Published · cited 17× · 65 F.4th 182
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit ____________ FILED March 23, 2023 No. 23-60037 Lyle W. Cayce ________
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2023-03-23 · Published · cited 0×
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit ____________ FILED March 23, 2023 No. 23-60037 Lyle W. Cayce ________
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2023-08-09 · Published · cited 6× · 77 F.4th 546
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 22-3053 JADAIR INTERNATIONAL, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. AMERICAN NATIONAL PROPERTY & CASUALTY COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District C
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2018-10-24 · Published · cited 13× · 907 F.3d 333
JAMES L. DENNIS, Circuit Judge: Plaintiff, Three Expo Events, L.L.C. (Three Expo), is a Texas limited liability company engaged in the business of producing and presenting adult love- and sex-themed conventions in major cities of the nation. After staging such an event in the City of Dallas's Convention Center in August 2015 (Exxxotica 2015), the City and Three Expo informally agreed to
Supreme Court of Vermont · 2015-06-26 · Published · cited 0× · 199 Vt. 538; 2015 Vt. 88; 127 A.3d 93; 2015 VT 88; 2015 Vt. LEXIS 66
¶ 1. Skoglund, J. Neighbors of a plot of land in Chester appeal the Environmental Division’s decision to grant an Act 250 permit amendment to appellee Zaremba Group to build a Dollar General store (“the Project”) on that plot. We affirm. ¶ 2. The trial court found the following facts relevant to this appeal. Zaremba is the owner of the 10.08-acre plot of land in question. The proposed building
Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2024-05-01 · Published · cited 0×
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals South Carolina Coastal Conservation League, Appellant, v. South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control and DeBordieu Colony Community Association, Respondents. Appellate Case No. 2021-000158 Appeal From The Administrative Law Court Ralph King Anderson, III, Administrative Law Judge Opinion No. 6058 Heard March 7, 2024 – Filed May 1, 2024
Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2021-11-09 · Published · cited 2× · 341 Conn. 316
TORO CREDIT COMPANY v. BETTY ANNE ZEYTOONJIAN, TRUSTEE, ET AL. (SC 20534) McDonald, D’Auria, Mullins, Kahn and Ecker, Js. Syllabus The plaintiff sought to foreclose a mortgage on commercial property owned by the defendants that was comprised of parcel A and parcel B, and secured by a promissory note. A remedies provision in the mortgage agreement between the parties permitted the plaintiff to seek forec
District Court, District of Columbia · 2024-02-23 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) BASSEM AL-TAMIMI, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Case No. 16-cv-445 (TSC) ) SHELDON ADELSON, et al.,
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2017-11-21 · Published · cited 7× · 179 A.3d 624
OPINION BY SENIOR JUDGE JAMES GARDNER COLINS Petitioner UGI Utilities, Inc. (UGI) commenced this action in the Court's original *626 jurisdiction on October 13, 2015, seeking a declaratory judgment that certain ordinances of Respondent City of Reading (City) are invalid and a permanent
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014-12-15 · Published · cited 0×
[J-37-2013][M.O. – Baer, J.] IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT PENNSYLVANIA NATIONAL MUTUAL : No. 86 MAP 2012 CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY : : Appeal from the Order of the Superior : Court at No. 277 EDA 2011 dated V. : 11/2
District Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2017-08-17 · Published · cited 0× · 276 F. Supp. 3d 904
*906OPINION AND ORDER J. LEON HOLMES, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Kassandra Nieves commenced this action to recover damages for the tragic death of Juan Nieves. Nieves died when the CMT 123B barge on which he was working sank. Cooper Marine & Timber-lands Corporation was the owner pro hac vice of the barge and is also the owner of a tug