⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “400 Lincoln Square Tenant LLC”

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2017-01-10 · Published · cited 0× · 54 Misc. 3d 63; 48 N.Y.S.3d 1
Ling-Cohan, J. (dissenting). I respectfully dissent and vote to reverse, as landlord failed to establish that tenant breached the terms of the parties’ settlement stipulation. As recently stated by this court, “[s]trict enforcement of the parties’ stipulation ... is warranted [here] based upon the principle that the parties to a civil dispute are free to chart their own litigation course” (Trio 90 LLC v Williamson, 53 Mis
Oregon Tax Court · 2017-02-09 · Published · cited 2× · 22 Or. Tax 349
No. 37 February 9, 2017 349 37 Contemporary, Inc. I v. Dept. of Rev. YU February22 9, OTR 2017 IN THE OREGON TAX COURT
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2023-02-02 · Published · cited 1× · 2023 Ohio 300
[Cite as 1415 Kenilworth, L.L.C. v. Cleveland, 2023-Ohio-300.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA 1415 KENILWORTH, LLC, : Plaintiff-Appellant, : No. 111249 v. : CITY OF CLEVELAND, OHI
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2017-01-10 · Published · cited 0×
222 East 12 Realty, Petitioner-Landlord againstYuk Kwan So, Respondent-Tenant-Appellant, - and - "John Doe" and "Jane Doe" Respondents-Undertenants. Tenant appeals from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, New York County (Jack Stoller, J.), dated December 31, 2014, after a hearing, which granted landlord's motion for entry of a judgment of possession pursuant to a sti
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021-07-08 · Published · cited 8× · 196 A.D.3d 900; 151 N.Y.S.3d 700; 2021 NY Slip Op 04273
Matter of Hart v Town of Guilderland (2021 NY Slip Op 04273) Matter of Hart v Town of Guilderland 2021 NY Slip Op 04273 Decided on July 8, 2021 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Report
Massachusetts Superior Court · 2011-02-14 · Published · cited 0× · 28 Mass. L. Rptr. 215
Moses, Richard T., J. INTRODUCTION The present action was filed by George Brenner (“Brenner”) who is a licensed real estate broker and president of the plaintiff, Brenner Realtors, Inc. (“Brenner Realtors”). Named as defendants are Frank Marchione (“Marchione”) and Nicola Marchione as trustees of Catahoula Realty Trust (the “Trust”). The plaintiffs’ claims arise out of a listing agreement entitled “Authoriza
Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth) · 2025-03-13 · Published · cited 0×
In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-23-00245-CV ___________________________ ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, AS SUCCESSOR BY MERGER TO MARYLAND CASUALTY COMPANY, Appellant V. THE BURLINGTON NORTHERN AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY, AS SUCCESSOR TO BUR
District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2019-03-19 · Published · cited 8× · 374 F. Supp. 3d 315
NAOMI REICE BUCHWALD, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Plaintiff New York University (NYU) brought this suit against its insurer Factory Mutual Insurance Company (FM) after FM provided less than all of the coverage that NYU claims it was due under its insurance policy ("the Policy") for losses sustained when Superstorm Sandy struck New York City on October 29, 2012. NYU advanced five claims for declaratory relief, seeking to define cert
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2018-11-26 · Published · cited 0× · 458 P.3d 626; 2020 OK CIV APP 5
OAK TREE PARTNERS, LLC v. WILLIAMS Skip to Main Content Accessibility Statement Help Contact Us
People v. Hernandezpublic domain
New York Court of Appeals · 2025-02-18 · Published · cited 23× · 43 N.Y.3d 591; 2025 NY Slip Op 00904
People v Hernandez (2025 NY Slip Op 00904) People v Hernandez 2025 NY Slip Op 00904 [43 NY3d 591] February 18, 2025 Garcia, J. Court of Appeals Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
Wyoming Supreme Court · 2014-02-04 · Published · cited 11× · 2014 WY 17
IN THE SUPREME COURT, STATE OF WYOMING 2014 WY 17 OCTOBER TERM, A.D. 2013 February 4, 2014 TERRY MINER and COLLEEN MINER, Husband and Wife, Appellants (Plaintiffs), v. S-13-0094 JESSE & GRACE, LLC, a Wyoming Close Limited Liability Company, and SNOWY RANGE HOUSING, LL
California Court of Appeal, 5th District · 2017-06-21 · Published · cited 7× · 220 Cal. Rptr. 3d 393; 12 Cal. App. 5th 1196; 2017 WL 2665935; 2017 Cal. App. LEXIS 569
ALDRICH, J. *1199In November 2014, the voters of Malibu enacted Measure R, an initiative designed to limit large developments and chain establishments. The Park at Cross Creek, LLC (The Park) and Malibu Bay Company (Malibu Bay), both of which were developing projects in Malibu, petitioned the trial court to have Measure R declared invalid.
California Court of Appeal · 2017-06-21 · Published · cited 0×
Filed 6/21/17 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE THE PARK AT CROSS CREEK, B271620, B275311 LLC, et al., (Los Angeles County Plaintiffs and Respondents, Super. Ct. No. BS155299) v. CITY OF MALIBU, Defendant and Appellant; DRU ANN DIXON-JACOBSON et al., Interveners
Michigan Court of Appeals · 2020-03-24 · Published · cited 0×
If this opinion indicates that it is “FOR PUBLICATION,” it is subject to revision until final publication in the Michigan Appeals Reports. STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS HIGHFIELD BEACH AT LAKE MICHIGAN, FOR PUBLICATION March 24, 2020 Plaintiff-
California Court of Appeal · 2022-03-03 · Published · cited 0×
Filed 3/3/22 CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION* IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION TWO CRENSHAW SUBWAY B309288 COALITION, (Los Angeles County Plaintiff and Appellant, Super. Ct. No. BS174553) v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES et al., Defendants and Respondents; HAAS BHCP PROPERTY OWNER, LLC, Real Party
United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2008-10-17 · Published · cited 4× · 396 B.R. 146; 2008 Bankr. LEXIS 3119; 2008 WL 4649220
396 B.R. 146 (2008) In re BROKERS, INCORPORATED. Debtor. Carlton Eugene Anderson, et al, Plaintiffs, v. Brokers, Incorporated et al, Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 04-53451. Adversary No. 04-06074. United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. North Carolina, Winston-Salem Division. October 17, 2008. *153 Benjamin A. Kahn, Christine L. My
In Re Chandlerpublic domain
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2010-12-17 · Published · cited 2× · 441 B.R. 452; 2010 Bankr. LEXIS 4918; 2010 WL 5475251
441 B.R. 452 (2010) In re Michael Scott CHANDLER, Sr., Debtor. No. 10-16089-mdc. United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. December 17, 2010. *455 Eugene A. Steger, Jr., Eugene, Steger & Associates, PC, Chadds Ford, PA, for Debtor. MEMORANDUM OPINION MAGDELINE D. COLEMAN, Bankruptcy Judge.
New Jersey Tax Court · 2015-04-22 · Published · cited 17× · 28 N.J. Tax 363
ANDRESINI, J.T.C. This is the court’s opinion after trial in the above-referenced matter. Plaintiff, TD Bank, N.A. (the “Plaintiff’ or “Taxpayer”), challenged the assessments imposed by Defendant, City of Hack-ensack (the “Defendant” or “City”), on the above-captioned properties for the referenced tax years. For the reasons stated more fully below, the assessment for each year is reduced. I. Procedural
Wyoming Supreme Court · 2014-02-04 · Published · cited 2× · 317 P.3d 1124; 2014 WY 17; 2014 Wyo. LEXIS 19; 2014 WL 444216
KITE, Chief Justice. [¶ 1] Appellants Terry and Colleen Miner purchased vacant property in Laramie, Wyoming. Shortly thereafter, they discovered that the back of a four-plex apartment building on an adjacent property encroached five feet onto their property, along the length of the apartment building. The Miners brought an action seeking a declaration that they own the encroaching portion of the apartment building and an ord
Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017-12-05 · Published · cited 7× · 808 S.E.2d 763; 256 N.C. App. 656
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA No. COA16-704 Filed: 5 December 2017 Cumberland County, No. 15-CVS-7449 DAVID HAMPTON, and wife, MARY D. HAMPTON, Petitioners, v. CUMBERLAND COUNTY, Respondent. Appeal by Respondent from order entered 13 April 2016 by Judge Robert F. Floyd, Jr., in Cumberland County Superior Court. Heard in the Court of Appeals 11 January 2017. Yarborough, W