Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “325 Goodrich Avenue LLC v. Southwest Water Company”
325 Goodrich Avenue, LLC v. Southwest Water Co.public domain
ORDER ON PARTIES’ MOTIONS TO EXCLUDE AND DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT C. ASHLEY ROYAL, District Judge. The following Motions are presently before the Court: Defendant Southwest Water Company’s (“SWWC”) Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. 40], SWWC’s Motion to Exclude Expert Testimony of Dr. Rubin Shmulsky [Doc. 54], and Plaintiff 325 Goodrich Avenue, LLC’s (“Goodrich”) Motion to Exc
New York v. Adamowiczpublic domain
MEMORANDUM RULING TUCKER L. MELANQON, District Judge. I. Introduction This is a cost-recovery action brought under § 107(a) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (“CERCLA”). Plaintiff, the State of New York, seeks to recover costs incurred as a result of the investigation and cleanup of the National Heatset Printing Site (the “Site”), a
Phipps v. United Statespublic domain
Trails Act; Takings Claims; Cross-Motions for Partial Summary Judgment. OPINION HORN, J. FINDINGS OF FACT ' Plaintiffs are landowners in the town of Farragut, Iowa, who allege that they are entitled to receive just compensation under the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution because the United Sta
Beach Tv Properties Inc. v. Solomanpublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA THE ATLANTA CHANNEL, INC., : : Plaintiff, : Civil Action No.: 15-1823 (RC) : : v. : Re Document Nos.: 269, 270,
Flying S. Land Company v. United Statespublic domain
Nos. 15-1252L, 15-1253L, 15-1268L Filed: April 10, 2018 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * JOHN ARNOLD, et al., * FLYING S. LAND CO., et al., * * JOE L. DAWSON, et al., * * Fifth Amendment Taking; Rails to Plaintiffs,
Menendez v. United Statespublic domain
In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 16-1624L; No. 17-1931L Filed: June 29, 2018 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * REINALDO CASTILLO, et al., * * Plaintiffs, * Motion for Partial Summary v. * Judgment; Takings Claim;
Lucier v. United Statespublic domain
Nos. 16-865L, 16-893L Filed: June 1, 2018 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ANDREW S. LUCIER, et al., * THOMAS E. BEATTIE, et al., * * Plaintiffs, * * Cross-Motion for Partial Summary v.
Matter of Attorneys Who are in Violation of Judiciary Law Section 468-a for Failing to Registerpublic domain
Matter of Attorneys Who are in Violation of Judiciary Law Section 468-a for Failing to Register (2025 NY Slip Op 01717) Matter of Attorneys Who are in Violation of Judiciary Law Section 468-a for Failing to Register 2025 NY Slip Op 01717 Decided on March 20, 2025 Appellate Di
Trinity Industries, Inc. v. Greenlease Holding Co.public domain
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Joy Flowers Conti, Chief United States District Judge I. Introduction This, action was brought by plaintiffs Trinity Industries, Inc. and Trinity Industries Railcar .Corporation (together with Trinity Industries, Inc., the “Trinity plaintiffs”) seeking contribution under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (“C
December 16, 2015 CHARLES N. DRAPER, Appellant, Pro Se § CAUSE NO. 03-15-00741-CV § V. § IN THE THIRD COURT § OF APPEALS GREG GUERNSEY, § IN HIS CAPACITY AS DIRECTOR OF § at Austin, Texas PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT § WATERSHED P
Linda Batiste v. Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon, Inc.public domain
FILED 15-0975 12/21/2015 7:10:33 PM tex-8333751 SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS BLAKE A. HAWTHORNE, C
OPINION OF THE COURT Per Curiam. Section 468-a of the Judiciary Law requires every resident *35and nonresident attorney admitted to practice in the State of New York to file a biennial registration statement with the administrative office of the courts. A biennial registration fee must be paid at the time the statement is filed. This registration state
Childers v. United Statespublic domain
In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 08-1981 No. 07-4262 (Filed: August 5, 2013) (Reissed: April 2, 2014) ************************ NATHAN and DEBORAH * CHILDERS, et al., * * Plaintiffs, *
Fifth Amendment Taking; Rails-to-Trails, 16 U.S.C. § 1241 et seq.-, Just Compensation; Fair Market Value of Property Pre- and Post-Taking; Severance Damages; Conversion Land Damages; Cost to Cure; Buffering; Loss of Access; Unit Rule; Noneconomic Remainder; Highest and Best Use; Private Deed Restrictions; Public Use Restrictions; Zoning; Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions; Expert Disclosur
Childers v. United Statespublic domain
OPINION AND ORDER WILLIAMS, Judge. Contents Findings of Fact... 495 Discussion... 496 Jurisdiction... 496 Legal Standards Governing Just Compensation. .. 496 *493Appraisals of the Subject Properties... 498 The Expert
ACCEPTED 15-25-00028-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 5/27/2025 4:56 PM NO. 15-25-00028-CV-CV CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE
ACCEPTED 03-16-00131-CV 12911642 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS
ACCEPTED 04-15-00118-CV FOURTH COURT OF APPEAL
ACCEPTED 03-14-00510-CV 4519217 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 3/16/20
808 F.Supp.2d 417 (2011) NEW YORK STATE ELECTRIC & GAS CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. FIRSTENERGY CORPORATION, Defendant. FirstEnergy Corporation, Third-Party Plaintiff, v. I.D. Booth, Inc., Third-Party Defendant. Civil Action No. 3:03-CV-0438 (DEP). United States District Court, N.D. New York. July 11, 2011. Decision Denying Reconsideration Septemb