Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
11 opinions for “32 Monticello 2019, LLC”
Monticello v. Public Service Commnpublic domain
This opinion is subject to revision before final publication in the Pacific Reporter 2019 UT 43 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF UTAH MONTICELLO WIND FARM, LLC, Petitioner, v. PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF UTAH, Respondent.
Amin v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLCpublic domain
Amy Totenberg, United States District Judge I. INTRODUCTION "Oh Lord, won't you buy me a Mercedes Benz/My friends all drive Porsches, I must make amends/Worked hard all my lifetime no help from my friends/So Lord, won't you buy me a Mercedes Benz...."1 The Court leads with this first verse from the famous Janis Joplin blues tune Mercedes Benz as
Lawson v. Simmons Sporting Goods, Inc.public domain
RHONDA K. WOOD, Associate Justice Appellant Carolyn Lawson appeals the circuit court's dismissal of her premises-liability suit against appellee Simmons Sporting Goods, Inc., for lack of personal jurisdiction. We affirm because Arkansas courts do not have jurisdiction to entertain Lawson's claims against Simmons. I. Facts and Procedural Background Simmons operates a retail-sporting-goods sto
Sweet Sage Café, LLC v. Town of N. Redington Beachpublic domain
WILLIAM F. JUNG, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This case concerns alleged First Amendment retaliation through administrative code inspections and the constitutionality of a revised city ordinance authorizing such inspections. The matter comes to the Court on cross-motions for summary judgment from Plaintiffs, Dkt. 71, Defendant Town of North Redington Beach (the "Town"), Dkt. 73, and Defendant Sheriff Bob Gualtieri in his official ca
United States v. Ronald David Johnsonpublic domain
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 17-3776 ___________________________ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee v. Ronald David Johnson lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant ___________________________ No. 18-2455 ___________________________ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllllPlainti
United States v. Ronald David Johnsonpublic domain
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 17-3776 ___________________________ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee v. Ronald David Johnson lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant ___________________________ No. 18-2455 ___________________________ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllllPlainti
FfUIB IN The §6Uftsf Appeals RECEIVED \H Sixth DfStffet The Court of Aopeals Sixth District 1 9 2015
ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANT ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE Karl L. Mulvaney Edward F. Harney, Jr. Nana Quay Smith Erin M. Radefeld Dentons Bingham Greenebaum LLP Hume Smith Geddes Green & Indianapolis, Indiana Simmons, LLP Indianapolis, Indiana
Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. v. Estatepublic domain
Charles R. Simpson III, Senior Judge This matter is before the court for consideration of cross-motions for summary judgment in this declaratory judgment action. The plaintiffs, Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, Liberty Insurance Corporation, Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company, and LM Insurance Corporation (collectively herein "Liberty" or the "Liberty entities"), contend that there is diversity of citizenship between the partie
United Specialty Ins. Co. v. Cole's Place, Inc.public domain
RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 19a0206p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT UNITED SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, ┐ Plaintiff-Appellee, │ │
Freddie Eugene Owens v. Bryan P. Stirlingpublic domain
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Supreme Court Freddie Eugene Owens, Brad Keith Sigmon, Gary DuBose Terry, and Richard Bernard Moore, Respondents-Appellants, v. Bryan P. Stirling, in his official capacity as the Director of the South Carolina Department of Corrections; South Carolina Department of Corrections; and Henry McMaster, in his official capacity as Governor of the State of South Carolina, Appellants-Respondents. Appellate Case No. 2022-001280 A