⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “32 Digital Dental Lab, Inc”

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005-12-01 · Published · cited 0×
Opinions of the United 2005 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 12-1-2005 Howard Hess Dental v. Dentsply Intl Inc Preced
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005-12-01 · Published · cited 0×
Opinions of the United 2005 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 12-1-2005 Jersey Dental Lab v. Dentsply Intl Inc Precede
Eakins v. Huberpublic domain
Court of Appeals of Washington · 2010-02-23 · Published · cited 7× · 225 P.3d 1041
225 P.3d 1041 (2010) Sheri L. EAKINS, a single woman, Appellant, v. Dr. Phil HUBER and Jane Doe Huber, a married couple, and Spokane Cardiology, P.S., a Washington State Corporation, Respondents. No. 27357-1-III. Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 3. February 23, 2010. *1042 Dustin Douglass Deissner, Van Camp & Deissner
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2018-06-22 · Published · cited 33× · 893 F.3d 1047
BENTON, Circuit Judge. The plaintiffs sued Ferrellgas Partners, L.P., Ferrellgas, L.P. (collectively "Ferrellgas"), and AmeriGas Partners, L.P., alleging antitrust violations and seeking relief under federal and state law. The district court granted summary judgment for Defendants. Having jurisdiction under
Erin T. v. Kip T.public domain
Nebraska Court of Appeals · 2020-03-10 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE NEBRASKA COURT OF APPEALS MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT ON APPEAL (Memorandum Web Opinion) ERIN T. V. KIP T. NOTICE: THIS OPINION IS NOT DESIGNATED FOR PERMANENT PUBLICATION AND MAY NOT BE CITED EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY NEB. CT. R. APP. P. § 2-102(E). ERIN T., APPELLANT, V.
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston) · 2013-09-12 · Published · cited 0×
Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed September 12, 2013. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-12-00531-CV DENISE ZIMMERMAN, Appellant V. DR. LESLIE FARIAS, D.D.S., P.A. F/K/A DR. LESLIE FARIAS, D.D.S., P.C. AND LESLIE FARIAS, INDIVIDUALLY, Appellees On Appeal from the 269th District Court
District Court, N.D. Alabama · 2019-04-02 · Published · cited 1× · 382 F. Supp. 3d 1214
R. DAVID PROCTOR, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE In September 2018, the Board of Dental Examiners of Alabama ("Board" or "Dental Board") sent a cease-and-desist letter to SmileDirectClub, LLC ("SmileDirect"). The letter and subsequent communications from the Board informed SmileDirect that certain services it performs for customers at its Alabama shop can only be performed at facilities where a licensed dentist is physically present.
Eakins v. Huberpublic domain
Court of Appeals of Washington · 2010-02-23 · Published · cited 2× · 154 Wash. App. 592
Kulik, C.J. ¶1 Sheri Eakins appeals the trial court’s summary judgment dismissal of her medical malpractice claim against Dr. Philip Huber and Spokane Cardiology PS. She contends the trial court erred by concluding that her proffered medical causation evidence failed to meet the standard set forth in Frye v. United States, 54 App. D.C. 46, 293 F. 1013 (1923). Ms. Eakins alleges that the stents containing nickel placed in
District Court, D. Delaware · 2013-04-09 · Published · cited 0× · 937 F. Supp. 2d 490; 2013 WL 1426993
MEMORANDUM OPINION SUE L. ROBINSON, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION The court in this memorandum opinion construes limitations in U.S. Patent Nos. 6,574,267 B1 (“the'267 patent”), as reexamined,1 and 7,359,427 B2 (“the'427 patent”) (collectively, “the patents-in-suit”). Golden Bridge Technology, Inc. (“GBT”) has asserted infringement of the patents-in-suit
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2026-04-07 · Published · cited 0×
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT No. 24-2965 AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TESTING & MATERIALS, d/b/a ASTM International, Appellant v. UPCODES, INC.; GARRETT REYNOLDS; SCOTT REYNOLDS _____________________________ Appeal from the U.S. District Court, E.D. Pa. Judge Anita B. Brody, No. 2:24-cv-01895 Before: RESTREPO, MCKEE, a
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2017-03-29 · Published · cited 2× · 248 F. Supp. 3d 911
DECISION AND ORDER DENYING EMIRAT’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY' JUDGMENT (DOC. 71) AND GRANTING WS PACKAGING’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. 68) C. N. CLEVERT, JR., UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE In this diversity action, Emirat AG sues WS Packaging Group; Inc. and High Point *916Printing LLC over the allegedly defective printing of combination g
District Court, District of Columbia · 2015-02-25 · Published · cited 0× · 81 F. Supp. 3d 27; 2015 WL 781744
MEMORANDUM OPINION REGGIE B. WALTON, United States District Judge The plaintiff, Covidien LP, formerly known as Tyco Healthcare Group LP, filed this civil action against the defendants, Advanced Skeletal Innovations LLC and Bonutti Skeletal Innovations LLC, seeking declaratory relief. Complaint (“Compl.”) ¶¶ 1, 4. Specifically, the plaintiff seeks a declara
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2020-08-11 · Published · cited 5× · 969 F.3d 1134
Case: 19-12227 Date Filed: 08/11/2020 Page: 1 of 45 [PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 19-12227 ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 1:18-cv-02328-WMR SMILEDIRECTCLUB, LLC,
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2016-05-27 · Published · cited 0× · 189 F. Supp. 3d 442; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 69630; 2016 WL 3027826
MEMORANDUM A. Richard Caputo, United States District Judge Presently before the Court is a Motion for Partial Summary Judgment as to Liability filed by Plaintiff John Daubert (“Plaintiff” or “Daubert”). (Doc. 24.) In his Complaint, Plaintiff alleges that Defendant NRA Group, LLC (“Defendant” or “NRA”) violated the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1692, et seq. (“FDCPA”), when it maile
Appellate Court of Illinois · 2021-04-09 · Published · cited 0× · 2020 IL App (1st) 182702
Digitally signed by Reporter of Decisions Reason: I attest to Illinois Official Reports the accuracy and
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2008-12-17 · Published · cited 2× · 710 F. Supp. 2d 511; 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 102013; 2008 WL 5251308
710 F.Supp.2d 511 (2008) R. Bradley MAULE, Plaintiff, v. PHILADELPHIA MEDIA HOLDINGS, LLC; Gyro Advertising, Inc.; and Steven Grasse, Defendants. Civil Action No. 08-3357. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. December 17, 2008. *513 J. Conor Corcoran, Law Office of J. Conor Corcoran, Philadelphia, PA, for Plaintiff.</
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2021-07-20 · Published · cited 14× · 4 F.4th 1274
USCA11 Case: 19-12227 Date Filed: 07/20/2021 Page: 1 of 37 [PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 19-12227 ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 1:18-cv-02328 SMILEDIRECTCLUB, LLC,
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005-06-16 · Published · cited 88× · 412 F.3d 1291; 75 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1116; 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 11414; 2005 WL 1404564
MICHEL, Chief Judge. Default Proof Credit Card System, Inc. (“Default Proof’) appeals the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida’s grant of summary judgment that claim 1 of U.S. Patent No. 6,405,182 (“the T82 patent”) is invalid for failure to meet the definiteness requirement of 35 U.S.C. § 112, ¶ 2. Default Proof Credit Card Sys., Inc. v.
District Court, D. Delaware · 2018-09-07 · Published · cited 6× · 339 F. Supp. 3d 435
STARK, U.S. District Judge Plaintiff Align Technology, Inc. ("Align") filed four separate suits against Defendants 3Shape A/S and 3Shape Inc. (together, "3Shape" or "Defendants") on November 14, 2017. On February 2, 2018, 3Shape moved to dismiss the complaints in Civil Action Nos. 17-1646-LPS-CJB and 17-1647-LPS-CJB (the "Complaints") for failure to state a claim, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), based on its c
Nawg v. Rob Bontapublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023-11-07 · Published · cited 0×
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF No. 20-16758 WHEAT GROWERS; NATIONAL CORN GROWERS ASSOCIATION; D.C. No. UNITED STATES DURUM 2:17-cv-02401- GROWERS ASSOCIATION; WBS-EFB WESTERN PLANT HEALTH ASSOCIATION; MISSOURI FARM BUREAU; IOWA SOYBEAN OPINION ASSOCIATION; SOUTH DAKOTA AGRI-BUSINESS ASSOCIATION; NORTH DAKOTA GRAIN GROWERS ASSOCIATION;