Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “315 East 29 Street LLC”
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-13-00080-CV Appellants, Central Austin Apartments, LLC; UP-32nd Street, LLC; and UP-32nd Street Hospitality, LLC// Cross-Appellants, East Avenue Property Owners’ Association, Inc. and UP Austin Holdings, LP and UP Austin Land Holdings, LP v. Appellees, UP Austin Holdings, LP; UP Austin Land Holdings, LP; and East Avenue Pr
770 N.W.2d 105 (2009) 283 Mich. App. 422 CAPITOL PROPERTIES GROUP, LLC v. 1247 CENTER STREET, LLC. Docket No. 281112. Court of Appeals of Michigan. Submitted February 3, 2009, at Lansing. Decided April 16, 2009, at 9:05 a.m. *108 Abood Law Firm, (by Andrew P. Abood), East Lansing, for the
JOHN W. TUCKER v. BRANNEN LAKE EAST, LLCpublic domain
FOURTH DIVISION DILLARD, P. J., RICKMAN and PIPKIN, JJ. NOTICE: Motions for reconsideration must be physically received in our clerk’s office within ten days of the date of decision to be deemed timely filed. https://www.gaappeals.us/rules January 29, 20
Gateway Development/East Lyme, LLC v. Duongpublic domain
************************************************ The “officially released” date that appears near the beginning of an opinion is the date the opinion will be published in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it is released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the beginning of all time periods for the filing of postopin- ion motions and petitions for certification is the “offi- cially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical cor
East Coast Test Prep LLC v. Allnurses.com, Inc.public domain
ORDER VACATING THE ORDER OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE DATED DECEMBER 18, 2015 AND DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ DISCOVERY MOTION JOHN R. TUNHEIM, Chief Judge, United States District Court Free speech norms have long stood in tension with anti-defamation laws, and this case is but one more chapter in that ongoing saga. The Court is asked to decide today whether a website may litigate the First Amendment interests of its u
Burtch v. Opus, LLC (In re Opus East, LLC)public domain
OPINION1 Mary F. Walrath, United States Bankruptcy Judge I. PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND. . .48 II. JURISDICTION.. .48 III. FACTUAL BACKGROUND.. .48 IV. DISCUSSION...50 A. Insolvency... 50 1. Balance Sheet Test... 51 2. Inadequate Capi
PHIPPS, Presiding Judge. This appeal from two summary judgment orders is the third appearance of this case before this court. 1 In American Management I, the court stated the facts as follows. Appellees Fort Benning Family Communities, LLC (“FBFC”) and Fort Belvoir Res
American Bank of St. Paul v. City of Minneapolispublic domain
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 783 SYLLABUS An assessment collected under a city's police power is subject to a reasonableness standard rather than the special-benefit standard that applies to assessments collected under a city's taxing power. OPINION In this assessment disp
60 East 12th Street Tenants' Ass'n v. New York State Division of Housing & Community Renewalpublic domain
Matter of 60 E. 12th St. Tenants' Assn. v New York State Div. of Hous. & Community Renewal (2015 NY Slip Op 09599) Matter of 60 E. 12th St. Tenants' Assn. v New York State Div. of Hous. & Community Renewal 2015 NY Slip Op 09599 Decided on December 29, 2015
Digitally signed by Reporter of Decisions Illinois Official Reports Reason: I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this
2017 IL 117720 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS (Docket No. 117720) STONE STREET PARTNERS, LLC, Appellee and Cross-Appellant, v. THE CITY OF CHICAGO DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS et al., Appellants and Cross-Appellees.
MetroPCS New York, LLC v. Village of East Hillspublic domain
764 F.Supp.2d 441 (2011) METROPCS NEW YORK, LLC, Plaintiff, v. VILLAGE OF EAST HILLS, Village of East Hills Zoning Board of Appeals, and Village of East Hills Village Clerk, Defendants. No. 09-CV-4636 (SJF)(AKT). United States District Court, E.D. New York. January 20, 2011. *443 Alfred L. Amato, Richard Stephen Keenan, Amato Law
East Brunswick European Wax v. NLRBpublic domain
PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT ______________ Nos. 20-2120 & 20-2233 EAST BRUNSWICK EUROPEAN WAX CENTER, LLC v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD East Brunswick European Wax Center, LLC, Petitioner in No. 20-212 National Labor Relations Board, Petitioner
Bowser v. Dupont East Civic Action Assoc. Dupont East Civic Action Assoc. v. D.C. Office of Planningpublic domain
Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Atlantic and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of any formal errors so that corrections may be made before the bound volumes go to press. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS No. 22-CV-0884 MAYOR MURIEL BOWSER, et al., APPELLANTS, V. DUPONT EAST CIVIC ACTION ASSOCIATIO
Furry v. E. Bay Publ'g, LLCpublic domain
Kelly, J.* *1075Terry Furry sued his former employers East Bay Express and East Bay Publishing LLC (collectively East Bay) for, among other things, unpaid overtime wages, meal and rest break compensation, and statutory penalties for inaccurate wage statements. Although the trial court found that East Bay failed t
301 E. 60th St. LLC v. Competitive Solutions LLCpublic domain
301 E. 60th St. LLC v Competitive Solutions LLC (2023 NY Slip Op 02842) 301 E. 60th St. LLC v Competitive Solutions LLC 2023 NY Slip Op 02842 Decided on May 30, 2023 Appellate Division, First Department GONZ LEZ, J.
ACCEPTED 06-15-00007-CV SIXTH COURT OF APPEALS TEXARKANA, TEXAS 7/2/2015 9:18:06
WS CE RESORT OWNER, LLC v. HOLLANDpublic domain
315 Ga. 691 FINAL COPY S22G0030. WS CE RESORT OWNER, LLC v. HOLLAND et al. PINSON, Justice. A resort community in North Georgia includes a golf course next to a subdivision. The current owner of the resort wants to redevelop the golf course into a residential property, and several homeowners in the subdivision sued to stop it. The trial court concluded that the homeowners had an easement in the golf course and granted a permanent injunction preventing the course from being
Simaan, Inc. v. BP Products North America, Inc.public domain
395 F.Supp.2d 271 (2005) SIMAAN, INC. and Simaan Market Street, LLC, Plaintiffs, v. BP PRODUCTS NORTH AMERICA, INC. and BP Oil and Exploration, Inc. Defendants. No. 1:03 CV 00127. United States District Court, M.D. North Carolina. May 2, 2005. *272 Harry C. Storm, Lerch Early & Brewer, Bethesda, MD, Patricia P. Ridenhour, Tho
Hillside Place, LLC v. Rahmanpublic domain
Hillside Place, LLC v Rahman (2024 NY Slip Op 24279) [*1] Hillside Place, LLC v Rahman 2024 NY Slip Op 24279 Decided on October 28, 2024 Civil Court Of The City Of New York, Queens County Guthrie, J. Publi