Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “225 Development Realty Inc.”
Arenson v. Administrative District Counsel 1 (In re Pierport Development & Realty, Inc.)public domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION ON ADMINISTRATIVE COUNCIL 1 MOTION TO DISMISS JACK B. SCHMETTERER, Bankruptcy Judge. This matter relates to the chapter 7 bankruptcy case of Pierport Development & Realty, Inc. (“Debtor” or “Pierport”). Pierport is one of several businesses owned by Peter Arenson (“Arenson”). Prior to bankruptcy, Pierport entered into a collective bargaining agreement (“CBA”) with the Administrative
924 A.2d 447 (2007) 191 N.J. 344 GALLENTHIN REALTY DEVELOPMENT, INC., a New Jersey Corporation and/or George A. and Cynthia L. Gallenthin III, h/w, both jointly and severally, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. BOROUGH OF PAULSBORO, a New Jersey Municipality and/or Planning Board of Borough of Paulsboro and/or Paulsboro Redevelopment Agency, jointly and severally, Defendants-Respondents. Supreme Court of
Excel Capital Group Corp. v 225 Ross St. Realty, Inc. (2018 NY Slip Op 07291) Excel Capital Group Corp. v 225 Ross St. Realty, Inc. 2018 NY Slip Op 07291 Decided on October 31, 2018 Appellate Division, Second Department
225 West End Avenue Associates v. Bittorfpublic domain
OPINION AND ORDER ROBERT P. PATTERSON, Jr., District Judge: This is defendant’s motion for summary judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56. BACKGROUND Plaintiff’s predecessor in interest, Wild Bill Realty Corp., and defendant entered into a contract of sale (the Contract) in June 1987 for the 42 unit building at 225 West End Avenue, New York, New Yor
Florida Realty Inc. v. General Development Corp.public domain
459 F.Supp. 781 (1978) FLORIDA REALTY INC., Plaintiff, v. GENERAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, Defendant. No. 76-1809-Civ-CF. United States District Court, S. D. Florida. October 20, 1978. R. W. Miller, Kevin Glynn of Miller, Simmons, Moore & Jung, Kansas City, Mo., and Jack F. Weins of Abrams, Anton, Robbins, Resnick, Schneider & Mager, P. A., Hollywood, Fla.,
Triland Investment Group v. Warrenpublic domain
ON MOTION FOR REHEARING This opinion supplements the opinion of this Court dated June 9, 1987. Triland Investment Group, Jenncorp International, Stylus Holdings, Inc., Bright Hill Development and Realtron Holdings, Inc. (all referred to as Triland) along with Vista Mortgage & Realty, Inc., and L & N Land Corporation (both referred to as Vista) and Elvin Ray Warren (Warren) filed Motions for Rehearing. Since we find no merit in Tr
Little Tree Sushi Bar, Inc. v. City of Royal Oakpublic domain
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 31, 2018 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
MR. JUSTICE ERICKSON delivered the opinion of the Court. We granted certiorari to review Jones-Healy Realty, Inc. v. Colorado City Development Co., 39 Colo. App. 329, 568 P.2d 88 (1977). We reverse. Colorado City Development Company (CCDC), petitioner, is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Great Western United Corp. (GWU). In February of 1973, GWU contemplated selling the 11,000-acre ranch
Little Tree Sushi Bar, Inc. v. City of Royal Oakpublic domain
On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of plaintiffs-appellants to extend the time for filing their reply is GRANTED. The reply submitted on December 12, 2018, is accepted for filing.
W. L. Development Corp. v. Trifort Realty, Inc.public domain
Shapiro, J. In an action to foreclose a mortgage on certain lots located in Kings Park, Smithtown, New York, one of the defendants, the Ace Hardwood Flooring Co., Inc. (Ace), the holder of a mechanic’s lien, appeals from a judgment of foreclosure and sale of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, entered October 27, 1976, after a nonjury trial. THE ISSUE The issue on which this appeal turns is
W. L. Development Corp. v. Trifort Realty, Inc.public domain
OPINION OF THE COURT Gabrielli, J. The issue on this appeal is whether plaintiff’s prior recorded mortgage for materials and labor provided for the construe*493tion of streets, road drainage, curbs, sewer lines and gas and electric service mains in a real estate subdivision has priority over a subsequently filed mechanic’s lien. The
Red Tree Investments, LLC v. PDVSA, Petróleopublic domain
22-225-cv; 22-232-cv Red Tree Investments, LLC v. PDVSA, Petróleo UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term, 2022 (Submitted: March 28, 2023 Decided: September 20, 2023) Docket Nos. 22-225-cv, 22-232-cv RED TREE INVESTMENTS, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellee,
396 S.C. 338 (2011) 721 S.E.2d 455 STEVENS & WILKINSON OF SOUTH CAROLINA, INC., Gary Realty Company, Inc., Garfield Traub Development, LLC, and Turner Construction Company, Plaintiffs, Of Whom Stevens & Wilkinson of South Carolina, Inc., Gary Realty Company, Inc., and Garfield Traub Development, LLC are, Appellants, v. CITY OF COLUMBIA, Paul C. "Bo" Aughtry, III, Windsor/Aughtry Co., Inc., Vista Hotel Partners
Sobenis v. Harridge House Associates of 1984public domain
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants 225 East 57th Street Owners Corp. and Wallack Management, Inc., appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Schmidt, J.), dated September 6, 2012, which denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them. Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the motion is granted.
Sobenis v. Harridge House Associates of 1984public domain
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants 225 East 57th Street Owners Corp. and Wallack Management, Inc., appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Schmidt, J.), dated September 6, 2012, which denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them. Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the motion is granted.
Laura v. v. Catamount Dev. Corp.public domain
Laura V. v Catamount Dev. Corp. (2019 NY Slip Op 00225) Laura V. v Catamount Dev. Corp. 2019 NY Slip Op 00225 Decided on January 15, 2019 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bu
OPINION OF THE COURT FUENTES, Circuit Judge, with whom AMBRO, Circuit Judge, joins as to Parts II.A.2, II.B, and II.C, and GREENBERG, Circuit Judge, joins as to Part II.A. Hanover 3201 Realty, LLC (“Hanover Realty”) signed a contract with Wegmans to develop a supermarket on its property in Hanover, New Jersey. The agreement required Hanover Realty to secure all necessary governmental permi
NO. 12-07-00225-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT TYLER, TEXAS § APPEAL FROM THE IN THE GUAR
NO. 12-07-00225-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT TYLER, TEXAS § APPEAL FROM THE IN THE GUARDIANSHIP OF LUKE FORREST HUMPHREY, § COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2 OF AN INCAPACITATED PERSON §
Reversed and Remanded and Majority and Dissenting Opinions filed February 3, 2009 Reversed and Remanded and Majority and Dissenting Opinions filed February 3, 2009. In The