Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “1385 Plaza LLC”
Uni-Rty Corp. v. New York Guangdong Finance, Inc.public domain
*447 Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Ellen M. Coin, J.), entered June 16, 2015, which denied petitioners’ motions pursuant to CPLR 409 (b) for summary judgment against respondents China Construction Bank and Agricultural Bank of China directing the turnover of monies received from respondent New York Guangdong Finance, Inc., and su
DONOVAN, J. {¶ 1} Plaintiff-appellant Greater Dayton Regional Transit Authority (hereinafter "RTA") appeals a judgment of the Montgomery County Court of Common Pleas, which overruled its motion to vacate an arbitration award issued in favor of defendant-appellee Amalgamated Transit Union, AFL-CIO, Local 1385 (hereinafter the "Union"). On appeal, RTA argues that the trial court erred whe
People v. Chavezpublic domain
CUÉLLAR, J. *776 A trial court has broad power to dismiss an action against a criminal defendant in "furtherance of justice" under Penal Code section 1385. 1 ( § 1385, subd. (a) ["The judge or magistrate may ... in furtherance of ju
Judgment rendered July 13, 2022. Application for rehearing may be filed within the delay allowed by Art. 2166, La. C.C.P. No. 54,239-CA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA ***** ANGELA R. ROGERS AND Plaintiffs-App
RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 17a0113p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, ┐ Petitioner, │ │
the Mian Development Corporation v. Statepublic domain
AFFIRMED and Opinion Filed July 18, 2019 S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-17-01385-CV THE MIAN DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 5
the Mian Development Corporation v. Statepublic domain
AFFIRMED and Opinion Filed December 3, 2019 S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-17-01385-CV THE MIAN DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 5
GLND 1945, LLC v. Ballardpublic domain
GLND 1945, LLC v Ballard (2019 NY Slip Op 04143) GLND 1945, LLC v Ballard 2019 NY Slip Op 04143 Decided on May 29, 2019 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to
Duhon v. Lafayette Consol. Governmentpublic domain
918 So.2d 1114 (2005) John Aaron DUHON, et al. v. LAFAYETTE CONSOLIDATED GOVERNMENT. No. 05-657. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit. December 30, 2005. *1115 Hawkins & Villemarette, L.L.C., Scott M. Hawkins, Chris Villemarette, Lafayette, Counsel for Plaintiffs/Appellants: John Aaron Duhon, et al. Roy, Bivins,
GREGORY SWAFFORD * NO. 2021-CA-0200 FAMILY TRUST * COURT OF APPEAL VERSUS * FOURTH CIRCUIT GRAYSTAR MORTGAGE, LLC, JB 430 HOLDINGS LLC, * STATE OF LOUISIANA AND THE HONORABLE MARLIN H. GUSMAN IN THIS * OFFIC
Stempien v. Wallspublic domain
Stempien v Walls (2021 NY Slip Op 02683) Stempien v Walls 2021 NY Slip Op 02683 Decided on April 30, 2021 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law
GREGORY SWAFFORD * NO. 2021-CA-0200 FAMILY TRUST * VERSUS COURT OF APPEAL * GRAYSTAR MORTGAGE, FOURTH CIRCUIT LLC, JB 430 HOLDINGS LLC, * AND THE HONORABLE STATE OF LOUISIANA MARLIN H. GUSMAN IN THIS ******* OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS THE ORLEANS PARISH SHERIFF
THOMPSON, WILLIAM R. v. SITHE/INDEPENDENCE LLCpublic domain
Appeal and cross appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, *1386Oswego County (James W McCarthy, J.), entered April 23, 2012. The order, inter alia, denied the motion of plaintiff for partial summary judgment pursuant to Labor Law § 240 (1). It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is modified on the law by vacating the fifth ordering paragraph, reinstating the s
People v. Toluca Lake Collectivepublic domain
Filed 8/18/17 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION APPELLATE DIVISION OF THE SUPERIOR COURT STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES THE PEOPLE, ) BR 053046 ) Plaintiff and Appellant, ) East Los Angeles Trial Court ) v.
People v. Toluca Lake Collective, Inc.public domain
Richardson, J. *20INTRODUCTION A misdemeanor complaint was filed on June 20, 2014, charging defendants Toluca Lake Collective, Inc. (TLC), Frank Jay Sheftel (Sheftel), Hatteras Holdings, LLC, and Peter Welkin with operating an unlawful medical marijuana business (MMB) in violation of Los Angeles Municipal Code (LAMC)
People v. Andersonpublic domain
Filed 8/22/24 CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION* IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, A166291 v. JUCARI SCOTT ANDERSON, (Alameda County Super. Ct. No. 19CR017742) Defendant and Appellant.
RICK M. SUTTON, * NO. 2019-CA-0992 INDIVIDUALLY AND DERIVATIVELY ON BEHALF * OF RJANO HOLDINGS, INC. COURT OF APPEAL AND MAISON ROYALE, LLC * FOURTH CIRCUIT VERSUS * STATE OF LOUISIANA JACK ADAMS, MAISON ******* ROYALE, LLC AND RJANO, INC.
Shipley Fuels Marketing, LLC v. Medrowpublic domain
*1216OPINION BY BENDER, J. Shipley Fuels Marketing (Shipley) appeals the trial court’s entry of summary judgment in favor of Andrew Johnson and Dona Saporosa (the Johnsons), refusing to enter a lien on real property pursuant to Shipley’s confession of judgment after title was transferred to the Johnsons. Shipley contends that the Johnsons had ample no
Adams v. American Federation of Statepublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION Paul W. Grimm, United States District Judge This labor dispute involves local union members; the national organization American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees International (“AFSCME” or “AFSCME International”); the Association of Classified Employees of the Prince George’s County School System (“Local 2250” or “ACE”), and Local 2250’s Executive Board members (“Executiv
Muir Enterprices Inc. v. Deli Nation LLCpublic domain
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND STATING MATERIAL FACTS NOT IN DISPUTE DAVID NUFFER, District Judge. Introduction........................................................... 1221 Undisputed Facts....................................................... 1222 Discussion.............................................................