Cases

211-12 N. Blvd. Corp. v LIC Contr., Inc. (2020 NY Slip Op 04134) 211-12 N. Blvd. Corp. v LIC Contr., Inc. 2020 NY Slip Op 04134 Decided on July 22, 2020 Appellate Division, Second Department Leventhal, J.p., J.

*268MEMORANDUM AND ORDER WEXLER, DISTRICT JUDGE Plaintiff Abcon Associates, Inc. (“Abcon” or “Plaintif’) brings this action to recover legal fees it paid its attorneys, the Defendants Haas & Najarían and Haas & Naja-rían LLP (“H&N” or “Defendants”) for its representation of Abcon in an action against the United States Postal Service (“USPS

ACCEPTED 14-14-01014-CV FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 5/27/2015 1:52:30 PM

ACCEPTED 14-14-01014-CV FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 5/27/2015 1:52:30 PM

OSCN Found Document:Haddan et al. vs The Coves Master Association, Inc. et al. Previous Case Top Of Index This Point in Index Citationize Next Case

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER TOWNES, District Judge. Plaintiff Mark Szuszkiewicz brings this employment discrimination suit against his former employer J.P. Morgan Securities LLC (hereinafter “J.P. Morgan”), successor to Chase Investment Services Corp., incorrectly named in the complaint as JPMorgan Chase Bank. He claims that he was subjected to a hostile work environment and termination on account of

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant Montauk Properties, LLC, appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (LaSalle, J.), dated June 12, 2013, as denied that branch of its motion which was for summary judgment on its cross claim for contractual indemnification against the defendant Gambar Food Corp. *855</

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant Montauk Properties, LLC, appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (LaSalle, J.), dated June 12, 2013, as denied that branch of its motion which was for summary judgment on its cross claim for contractual indemnification against the defendant Gambar Food Corp. *855</

[Cite as State v. Tolbert, 2025-Ohio-4469.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA STATE OF OHIO, : Plaintiff-Appellant, : No. 114748 v. : QEYEON TOLBERT,

FILED IN 14th COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 1/6/2015 12:33:02 PM

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER SPATT, District Judge. On September 11, 2012 the Plaintiff Tressa Kurian (“the Plaintiff’) commenced this action against North Shore University Hospital (“North Shore”) and Galia Bagsadarova (“Bagsadarova”). In the Original Complaint, the Plaintiff brought the following three causes of action: (1) an age discrimination claim pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of

ACCEPTED 15-25-00012-cv FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 3/17/2025 7:19 PM No. 15-25-00012-CV

OSCN Found Document:GRAHAM v. CROW Previous Case Top Of Index This Point in Index Citationize Next Case Print Only

PLAQUEMINES DIRT & CLAY * NO. 2019-CA-0831 COMPANY, L.L.C. * VERSUS COURT OF APPEAL * PLAQUEMINES PARISH FOURTH CIRCUIT GOVERNMENT * STATE OF LOUISIANA ******* APPEAL FROM

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for prima facie tort, the plaintiffs appeal from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Farneti, J.), dated February 9, 2015, as granted that branch of the motion of the defendants Charles Chi, Myra Reyes-Chi, Chi’s Martial Arts, Inc., and Chi’s Martial Arts of Lindenhurst which was pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (7) to dismiss the complaint insofar as a

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of contract, the plaintiff appeals (1), as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Emerson, J.), dated June 3, 2010, as, in effect, granted that branch of the defendants’ motion which was for a protective order quashing its subpoenas seeking discovery related to certain unpleaded causes of action, and (2) from an order of the same court dated December 22,

OSCN Found Document:SCHIEWE v. CESSNA AIRCRAFT CO Previous Case Top Of Index This Point in Index Citationize Next Case Print Only

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of contract, the plaintiff appeals (1), as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Emerson, J.), dated June 3, 2010, as, in effect, granted that branch of the defendants’ motion which was for a protective order quashing its subpoenas seeking discovery related to certain unpleaded causes of action, and (2) from an order of the same court dated December 22,

In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 20-169T (Filed: September 18, 2020) ************************************* JESSE GRAVES YATES, III, * Pro Se Plaintiff; RCFC 12(b)(1); RCFC * 12(b)(6); Tax Refund Suit; Claims Against P

GRAND CREST OWNERS ASSOC. v. STITES Skip to Main Content Accessibility Statement Help Contact Us