Cases

970 F.Supp. 1094 (1997) Marilyn J. BARTLETT, Plaintiff, v. NEW YORK STATE BOARD OF LAW EXAMINERS; James T. Fuller, Individually and as Executive Secretary, New York State Board of Law Examiners; John E. Holt-Harris, Jr., Individually and as Chairman, New York State Board of Law Examiners; Richard J. Bartlett, Individually and as Member, New York State Board of Law Examiners, Laura Taylor Swain, Individually and as Member, New York State Board of

BENTON, Judge. The sole issue presented by this appeal is whether the Workers’ Compensation Commission exceeded its authority in ordering an employee to execute a release authorizing his employer’s attorney, and anyone authorized by his employer’s attorney, to obtain from the Social Security Administration information concerning the

141 Nev., Advance Opinion +| IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA THE NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY; No. 89347 CABLE NEWS NETWORK, INC.; THE ASSOCIATED PRESS; NATIONAL PUBLIC RADIO, INC.; WP COMPANY LLC; REUTERS NEWS & MEDIA INC.; AND AMERICAN BROADCASTING F | L E D COMPANIES, INC., Petitioners, DEC 23 20 Vs. E A BR THE SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT wf te “ COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, DEPUTY CLERK IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF WASHOE; THE HONORABLE DAVID A. HARDY, DISTRICT JUDGE; AND THE HONORABLE

*********** The undersigned have reviewed the prior Opinion and Award based upon the record of the proceedings before Deputy Commissioner Glenn and the briefs and arguments of the parties. The appealing party has not shown good ground to reconsider the evidence, receive further evidence, rehear the parties or their representatives, and having reviewed the competent evidence of record, the Full Commission adopts the Opinion and Award of Deputy Co

202 Argued and submitted March 22, 2018, affirmed on appeal and cross-appeal August 26, 2020 Alice J. GOLIK, individually and as personal representative of the Estate of Robert J. Golik, Plaintiff-Appellant Cross-Respondent, v. CBS CORPORATION, fka Viacom, Inc., a Delaware

In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 18-1699T Filed: May 31, 2020 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** * MEIR PERETZ, * * Plaintiff, Tax Refund; 26 U.S.C. § 6532 *

In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 18-1699T Filed: May 31, 2020 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** * MEIR PERETZ, * * Plaintiff, Tax Refund; 26 U.S.C. § 6532 * Statute of Limita

862 F.Supp. 1546 (1992) Royce I. EHRET, Jr. v. The STATE OF LOUISIANA, et al. Civ. A. No. 91-1416. United States District Court, E.D. Louisiana. March 4, 1992. *1547 Gilbert R. Buras, Jr., Robein, Urann & Lurye, Metairie, LA, for plaintiff, Royce I. Ehret, Jr. Michael R. Delesdernier, Sidney Donecio Torres, III, Law Of

58 F.Supp.2d 294 (1999) Sean POLLACK, Kyle Pollack, Paul Pollack, all infants, by their parent and natural guardian Stuart Pollack, Rachel Pollack and Stuart Pollack, Plaintiffs, v. Joan NASH, Barbara Wilmit, William P. Warren, Jacqueline Sands, Margaret Garvey, Alexander Bursztein, G. Nicholas Del Pizzo, Noah Weinberg, in his capacity as the Commissioner of Social Services of the County of Rockland of the State of New York, County of Rockland, P

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ANALISA TORRES, District Judge: Plaintiff pro se, Rasheem M. Holland, a practicing Muslim, brings this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against the City of New York (the “City”), City Department of Correction officials, and individual correction officers, alleging that his constitutional rights were violated when, as a pretrial detainee at Rikers Island, he was subjected t

Pollak, Acting P.J., Dissenting. Of the numerous issues presented by this difficult case, two are fundamental: Do sections 1 and 5 of article IX of the California Constitution compel the state to maintain an elementary school system for grades kindergarten through grade 12 (K-12) that meets some minimal qualitative standard and, if so, is the claim that the present school system fails to meet that standard justiciable-that is, may

BIRCH, Circuit Judge: Jimmie Ruth Daughtrey brought this action against Honeywell, Inc. and Bull HN Information Systems (“Honeywell”) 1 alleging violations of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act, 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. (“ERISA”) and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, 29 U.S.C. § 621

POLLAK, J., Dissenting. — Of the numerous issues presented by this difficult case, two are fundamental: Do sections 1 and 5 of article IX of the California Constitution compel the state to maintain an elementary school system for grades kindergarten through 12 (K-12) that meets some minimal qualitative standard and, if so, is the claim that the present school system fails to meet tha

RULING SHELLY D. DICK, DISTRICT JUDGE, MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA The Court has carefully considered the Petition1, the record, the law applicable to this action, and the Report and Recommendation2 of United States Magistrate Judge Stephen C. Riedlinger dated August 25, 2015. Plaint

MEMORANDUM OPINION LORETTA C. BIGGS, District Judge On December 15, 2015, Plaintiffs, Action NC, Democracy North Carolina, and North Carolina A. Philip Randolph Institute (“Organizational Plaintiffs”), and Plaintiffs Sherry Denise Holverson, Isabel Najera, and Alexandria Marie Lane (“Individual Plaintiffs”) commenced this action seeking declaratory and injunctive relief, alleging violations of Sections 5

ANN WALSH BRADLEY, J. ¶1. The petitioner, Angela M.W., seeks review of a court of appeals' decision1 denying her request for either a writ of habeas corpus or a supervisory writ to prohibit the Waukesha County Circuit Court, Kathryn W. Foster, Judge, from continuing to exercise jurisdiction in a CHIPS (child alleged to be in need of protection or services) proceeding. She maintains that the CHIPS stat

ORDER ROSLYNN R. MAUSKOPF, District Judge. By motions filed April 13, 2011, the District Defendants1 and defendant Tom Kretsos moved for summary judgment of *525all plaintiffs’ claims. (Doc. Nos. 157, 158.) By Order entered October 25, 2011, this Court referred those motions to the assigned Magistrate Judge,

OPINION AND ORDER JOHN G. KOELTL, District Judge: Robert Bertuglia, Jr. (“Bertuglia”), and Laro Maintenance Corporation, Laro Maintenance, and Laro Service Systems (together “Laro”) bring this action against *615the following defendants: (1) three Port Authority of New York and New Jersey employees — Jeffrey Schaffler, Fred Fer-rone, and

Filed 4/20/16 (review denied 8/22/16; reposted to include Supreme Court statements upon denial of review) CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE CAMPAIGN FOR QUALITY EDUCATION et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, A134423 v

344 F.3d 154 Sharwline NICHOLSON, individually and on behalf of her infant children, Destinee Barnett and Kendell Coles and on behalf of all others similarly situated; Destinee Barnett, Kendell Coles, infants; Sharlene Tillett, individually and on behalf of infants Winston Denton and Uganda Gray; Ekaete Udoh, individually and on behalf of her infant children, Edu Udoh, Ima Udoh, Nsikak Udoh and Asuno Udoh; and J.A. and G.A., infants on behalf of al