Cases

Spain, J. Petitioner (hereinafter the father) and respondent (hereinafter the mother) are the parents of a son born in 1998. Upon divorcing in 2002, they stipulated to shared custody and equal parenting time. In January 2005, the father commenced this modification proceeding requesting sole custody alleging that the mother was exhibiting increasingly strange behavior and making poor decisions, that he was concerned about her m

104 F.3d 1043 52 Soc.Sec.Rep.Ser. 524, Unempl.Ins.Rep. (CCH) P 15655BJoyce GWATHNEY, SS # nct-ip-dunf Appellant,v.Shirley S. CHATER, Commissioner, Social SecurityAdministration, Appellee. No. 96-1751. United States Court of Appeals,Eighth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 21, 1996.Decided Jan. 14, 1997. Anth

USCA1 Opinion April 23, 1996 [NOT FOR PUBLICATION] UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT ____________________ No. 95-1791 ADRIAN GARCIA-MARTINEZ,

130 Wis.2d 56 (1986) 387 N.W.2d 245 MILWAUKEE BREWERS BASEBALL CLUB, a Wisconsin limited partnership, Milwaukee Brewers Baseball Club, Inc., Raymond Elwood Jackson, and Ray Jackson's, Inc., Petitioners-Respondents, v. The Wisconsin DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & SOCIAL SERVICES, Appellant. No. 85-0855. Supreme Court of Wisconsin. Argued November 25, 1985.

CARDAMONE, Circuit Judge. This appeal from a judgment entered in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Duffy, J.), which affirmed the rulings of the acting Commissioner of Social Security (Commissioner), raises issues of first impression in this Circuit. We must decide whether Supplemental Security Income (SSI) benefits for a child under age 18,

MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER SUZANNE H. SEGAL, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE I. INTRODUCTION Editha Mejia (“Plaintiff’) seeks review of the final decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration (the “Commissioner” or the “Agency”) denying her application for social security benefits. The parties consented, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), to

ORDER SAM SPARKS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE BE IT REMEMBERED on this day the Court reviewed the file in the above-styled cause, and specifically Plaintiff Linda Adams’ Brief on Review of the Denial of Benefits by the Commissioner of Social Security [#14], Defendant Carolyn Colvin, Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration’s Brief in Support of Commissioner’s Decision [#15], Adams’ Reply

ORDER SAM SPARKS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE BE IT REMEMBERED on the 17th, 18th, and 19th days of January 2017, the Court held a hearing in the above-styled cause, and the parties appeared, in person or through counsel. This case concerns a § 1983 suit brought by five Texas Planned Parenthood health care providers (Proyider Plaintiffs) and seven known but anonymized Jane Does (Individual Plaintiffs) (coll

ORDER (1) GRANTING THE CONSUMER Financial protection BUREAU’S PETITION TO ENFORCE CIVIL INVESTIGATIVE DEMAND AND (2) DENYING FUTURE INCOME PAYMENTS’ MOTION TO STAY CASE (Docs. 1, 27) HON. JOSEPHINE L. STATON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Before the Court is the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau’s (CFPB) Petition to Enforce Civil Investigative Demand. (Pet., Doc. 1.) Respondent Future Income Payments

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ON REHEARING Domingo Lugo brought this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) seeking judicial review of the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (“the Commissioner”) denying Lugo’s application for disability insurance benefits. By Opinion and Order dated March 13, 1996 (the “Order”), I remanded this action for further administrative proceedings. Defendant has timely moved for a

ORDER REMANDING THE ACTION PURSUANT TO SENTENCE FOUR OF 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) ORDER DIRECTING ENTRY OF JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF PLAINTIFF FRANK GUTIERREZ JR. AND AGAINST DEFENDANT CAROLYN COLVIN, ACTING COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY Jennifer L. Thurston, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Frank Gutierrez Jr., asserts he is entitled to benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act. Pl

FILED Juwzszmz Clerk, U.S. District & Bankruptcy Courts for the Distr|ct of Columbia UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT ()F COLUMBIA BEVERLY J 0 JONES, ) Plaintiff, § v. § Civil Action No. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION,§ Defendant. § MEMORANDUM OPINION This matter is before the Court on consideration of the plaintiffs application to proceed in forma pauperis and her pro se complaint. The application will be granted, and the complaint will be dismissed. The plaintiff currently

*929 ORDER EDMUND F. BRENNAN, United States Magistrate Judge. Plaintiff seeks judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner”) denying her application for a period of disability and Disability Insurance Benefits (“DIB”) under Title II of the Social Security Act. The parties’ cross-motions for summa

ORDER EDMUND F. BRENNAN, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Plaintiff seeks judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner”) denying her application for a period of disability and Disability Insurance Benefits (“DIB”) under Title II of the Social Security Act. The parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment are pending.1 For the reasons d

73 F.Supp.2d 8 (1999) DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION, et al., Plaintiffs, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, et al., Defendants. No. CIV. A. 98-2575(SS). United States District Court, District of Columbia. October 29, 1999. *9 *10 Ronald Nelson Sutter, Powers, Pyles, Sutter & Verville, P.

972 F.Supp. 211 (1997) Manuel BATISTA, Plaintiff, v. Shirley S. CHATER[1], Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. No. 96 Civ. 3885 (SS). United States District Court, S.D. New York. July 29, 1997. *212 *213 Charles E. Binder, Binder and Binder, Hauppauge, NY, for Plaintiff.

640 F.Supp.2d 1247 (2009) Edward H. BELL, Jr., Plaintiff, v. Michael J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. No. CIV S-07-2532 DAD. United States District Court, E.D. California. July 17, 2009. *1249 Bess M. Brewer, Bess M. Brewer and Associates, Sacramento, CA, for Plaintiff. Bobbie J. Montoya, SS, United S

958 F.Supp. 907 (1997) ESTATE OF Joseph RE (by Vivian R. Re and Patricia Re Coarsely, the personal representatives of the Estate of Joseph Re), and Vivian R. Re, John M. Re and Joseph O. Re, Plaintiffs, v. KORNSTEIN VEISZ & WEXLER, Daniel J. Kornstein, Howard S. Veisz and Marvin Wexler, Defendants. No. 94 Civ. 2369(SS). United States District Court, S.D. New York. A

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT PAUL MISKEY, No. 20-16597 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. v. 2:19-cv-00027- JCM-VCF KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant-Appellee. OP

26 F.Supp.2d 615 (1998) Raymond LEE, Plaintiff, v. Thomas A. COUGHLIN, III, Commissioner, James Mahoney, Hearing Officer, Defendants. No. 93 CIV. 8417(SS). United States District Court, S.D. New York. October 26, 1998. *616 David C. Leven, Robert Selcov, Prisoners' Legal Services of New York, Poughkeepsie, NY, Daniel L. Greenberg