Cases

ORDER GRANTING INGREDION INCORPORATED’S AND TATE & LYLE INGREDIENTS AMERICAS, INC.’S MOTION TO DISQUALIFY SQUIRE PATTON BOGGS LLP CONSUELO B. MARSHALL, District Judge. Before the Court is Defendant/Counter-claimant Ingredion Incorporated’s and Tate & Lyle Ingredients Americas, Inc.’s Motions to Disqualify Plaintiffs’ counsel, Squire Patton Boggs LLP (collectively the “Motions”). (Dkt. Nos. 232,

Dillard, Judge. These appeals arise out of a lease by Citrus Tower Boulevard Imaging Center, LLC (“Citrus”) to David S. Owens, MD, PC (“the PC”) of certain magnetic resonance imaging equipment and related services. The trial court granted summary judgment to the PC’s principal, Dr. David S. Owens (“Owens”) in Citrus’s action on a guaranty agreement executed in connection with the lease. Citrus appeals from that order in Case No

OPINION Jane Bland, Justice This is an appeal from a judgment against a guarantor of a loan. Copperfield Timberlake LLC, a real estate development company, secured the loan from a predecessor of U.S. Bank National Association.1 Copperfield Timberlake’s president, *86Anand Julka, executed a guaranty agreement in his indiv

442 B.R. 373 (2010) In re Jeanne S. DILORETO, Putative Debtor. Eric R. DiNallo, Superintendent of Insurance for the State of New York, in his capacity as Liquidator of Nassau Insurance Company, Appellant. Jeanne S. Diloreto, Cross-Appellant. Civil Action No. 08-4491. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. November 22, 2010. *3

Tyrell v Pollak (2018 NY Slip Op 05251) Tyrell v Pollak 2018 NY Slip Op 05251 Decided on July 12, 2018 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 43

OPINION JULIA SMITH GIBBONS, Circuit Judge. Plaintiffs-Appellants Sheet Metal Employers Industry Promotion Fund and Sheet Metal Employers Industry Reimbursement Fund (collectively the “Funds”) are multi-employer funds established by a collective bargaining agreement (“CBA”) between the Sheet Metal and Air Conditioning Contractor National Association— Metropolitan Detroit Chapter (“SMAC-NA”) and the Sheet

MEMORANDUM OPINION Schmehl, District'Judge I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff, Barry' Bloch (“Plaintiff’ or “Bloch”), brings this suit against his former employer, Mack Trucks, Inc. (“Defendant” or “Mack”), under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”), 29 U.S. C. §§ 621, et seq, and the Pennsylvania Human Relations Act (“PHRA”), 43 P.S. §§ 951 et seq., alleging that

10/31/2025 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE May 13, 2025 Session RUSSELL LEE MAZE and KAYE M. MAZE v. STATE OF TENNESSEE Appeal from the Criminal Court for Davidson County Nos. 99-B-1308; 2002-D-2361 Steve R. Dozier, Judge No. M2024-00666-CCA-R3-PC

The summaries of the Colorado Court of Appeals published opinions constitute no part of the opinion of the division but have been prepared by the division for the convenience of the reader. The summaries may not be cited or relied upon as they are not the official language of the division. Any discrepancy between the language in the summary and in the opinion should be resolved in favor of the language in the opinion.

MURRAY, J. (dissenting). The trial court held that Brighton City Ordinance § 18-59 was facially unconstitutional on the basis that the ordinance’s presumption, that an unsafe structure with an estimated repair cost of 100 percent of the structure’s predeteriorated condition value should be demolished, violated plaintiffs’ right to substantive due process. The majority’s decision to affirm that decision is in error because there ar

686 F.Supp.2d 138 (2010) BOSTON PROPERTY EXCHANGE TRANSFER COMPANY f/k/a Benistar Property Exchange Trust Company, Inc., Plaintiff, v. Joseph IANTOSCA, Individually and as Trustee of the Faxon Heights Apartments Realty Trust and Fern Realty Trust, Belridge Corporation, Gail A. Cahaly, Jeffrey M. Johnston, Bellemore Associates, LLC, Massachusetts Lumber Company, Inc., Zelle McDonough & Cohen LLP, Anthony R. Zelle, P.C. and Nystrom Beckman &

ORDER J.P. STADTMUELLER, District Judge. This case involves an insurance dispute arising from a 2013 fire at the Milwaukee County Courthouse (“the Courthouse”). (Docket ■ # 1, Ex. 2 ¶ 37). The plaintiff, State of Wisconsin Local Government Property Insurance Fund (“the Fund”), insures the Courthouse pursuant to its statutory obligations under Chapters 604 and 605 of the Wisconsin Statutes. (Id. ¶

ORDER re: Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment or, in the Alternative, Partial Summary Judgment [30] HONORABLE RONALD S.W. LEW Senior U.S. District Judge Currently before the Court is Defendant Circle K Stores Inc.’s (“Defendant”) Motion for Summary Judgment or, in the Alternative, Partial Summary Judgment (“Motion” or “Motion for Summary Judgment”). Having reviewed all papers submitted pertaining to t

MEMORANDUM OPINION VIRGINIA EMERSON HOPKINS, District Judge. This is a civil rights action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, in which the plaintiff, Ervin Heard, brings claims against the Bibb County, Alabama, Sheriff, Keith Hannah, in his official capacity, alleging violations of the Fourteenth Amendment, and under Alabama state law, in connection with the termination of the plaintiffs

361 F.3d 517 CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES, Petitioner,Southern California Edison Company, Intervenor-Petitioner,Public Utilities Commission of The State of California; Pacificorp, Intervenors-Respondents,Southern California Edison Company, Intervenor,Dynegy Power Marketing, Inc., Intervenor-Respondent,El Segundo Power L.L.C.; Long Beach Generation L.L.C.; Cabrillo Power I L.L.C.; Cabrillo Power II L.L.C.; South Coast

DeMOSS, Circuit Judge: In this medical malpractice diversity suit, defendants appeal a jury’s $3.5 million award to plaintiff Barbara Huss. We reverse and remand for a new trial. I. We begin with a brief overview of this litigation. Barbara Huss and her husband Rodney Huss filed this lawsuit on June 30, 2000. The parties consented to have the case heard before a magistrate judge. Trial wa

798 F.Supp.2d 831 (2011) OMNI USA, INC., Plaintiff, v. PARKER-HANNIFIN CORPORATION, Defendant. Civil Action No. H-10-4728. United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Houston Division. June 28, 2011. *835 Daniel Amando Ruiz, Law Office of Daniel A. Ruiz, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff. Jeremy Richard Stone, Mehaffy Weber PC, Hou

MEMORANDUM RESTREPO, District Judge. On July 17, 2013, Liberty Mechanical Services, Inc. (“Liberty”) filed this Miller Act suit against North American Specialty Insurance Company (“NASIC”). NASIC *612moves to dismiss the action as untimely filed. Liberty acknowledges its late filing, but argues that the motion should b

MEMORANDUM EDUARDO C. ROBRENO, District Judge. Plaintiff Kenneth Whitaker initiated this putative class action in the Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County against Defendant Herr Foods, Inc. (“Defendant”). Plaintiff alleges that Defendant “misbranded” approximately one dozen snack food products—namely, chips and pretzels. Defendant removed this action pursuant to the Class Action Fairn

345 B.R. 60 (2006) In re IDI CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC., Debtor. No. 04-17881(PCB). United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York. May 31, 2006. *61 Marilyn Simon & Associates, Marilyn Simon, Esq. Of Counsel, New York, NY, for Debtor. Platzer, Swergold, Karlin, Levine, Goldberg & Jaslow, LLP, Sherri D. Lydell, Esq., Scott