⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “(PC) Carlson v. Duffy”

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2016-09-13 · Published · cited 42× · 837 F.3d 827; 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 16708; 2016 WL 4758552
BEAM, Circuit Judge, dissenting. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff John Hugh Gilmore is an attorney in Minnesota and a recognizable politi*839cally conservative blogger and author. On June 16, 2011, two separate conferences or meetings were being held simultaneously on Nicollet Mall in downtown Minneapolis. Gilmore attended
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas · 2017-05-16 · Published · cited 0× · 571 B.R. 755
MEMORANDUM OPINION Marvin Isgur, UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY JUDGE Doyle and Margaret Hartman filed this adversary proceeding against Ultra Petroleum Corporation et al seeking to recover a percentage of Ultra’s gains attributable to its oil and gas hedging transactions. The Hartmans allege that hedging gains must be included within their net profits interest, which was created by the 1954 Pine-dale
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2017-02-21 · Published · cited 0× · 2017 Ohio 622
[Cite as In re Lubrizol Shareholders Litigation, 2017-Ohio-622.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT LAKE COUNTY, OHIO IN RE: LUBRIZOL : OPINION SHAREHOLDERS LITIGATION : CASE NO. 2016-L-026
District Court, S.D. Texas · 2010-03-31 · Published · cited 2× · 705 F. Supp. 2d 714; 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 35762
705 F.Supp.2d 714 (2010) ASSOCIATED AUTOMOTIVE INC., Plaintiff, v. ACCEPTANCE INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant. Civil Action No. H-09-2374. United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Houston Division. March 31, 2010. *716 Patrick Kevin Leyendecker, Moriarty Leyendecker Erben PC, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff. George T. J
District Court, D. Minnesota · 2009-05-29 · Published · cited 2× · 656 F. Supp. 2d 947; 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 45446; 2009 WL 1536503
656 F.Supp.2d 947 (2009) Taron COLENBURG, Plaintiff, v. STARCON INTERNATIONAL, INC., Defendant. Civ. No. 08-4683 (RHK/FLN). United States District Court, D. Minnesota. May 29, 2009. *952 Joni M. Thome, Clayton D. Halunen, Halunen & Associates, Minneapolis, MN, for Plaintiff. Kerry L. Middleton, Noah G. Lipschultz, Litt
District Court, S.D. Texas · 2007-08-28 · Published · cited 4× · 617 F. Supp. 2d 467; 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 63431
(2007) ACCEPTANCE INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. Melvin Alfredo MALTEZ, Associated Automotive, Inc., Cal Enderli, Shirley Enderli, and Cal Enderli, Jr., Individually and d/b/a Associated Automotive Salvage, Defendants. Civil Action No. H-04-2222. United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Houston Division. August 28, 2007. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2019-10-31 · Published · cited 53× · 941 F.3d 1320
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ ARTHREX, INC., Appellant v. SMITH & NEPHEW, INC., ARTHROCARE CORP., Appellees UNITED STATES, Intervenor ______________________ 2018-2140 ______________________ Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office
District Court, N.D. Indiana · 2017-04-28 · Published · cited 3× · 251 F. Supp. 3d 1225; 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 64938
OPINION AND ORDER Robert L. Miller, Jr., Judge Twenty proposed class actions in this multi-district litigation docket came before me on March 13-14 for fairness hearings. The cases are on limited remand from the court of appeals, where nineteen of them awaited resolution. The Judicial Panel on Multi-District Litigation centralized the cases under 28 U.S.C. § 1407, but the cases haven’t been consolidated,
District Court, N.D. Iowa · 2004-06-18 · Published · cited 10× · 321 F. Supp. 2d 1090; 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15222; 2004 WL 1368408
321 F.Supp.2d 1090 (2004) Scott KINKAID, Individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. JOHN MORRELL & COMPANY, Defendant. Alan Hoefling, Individually, and A & G Swine Enterprises, Inc., d/b/a Hoefling Hog Farms, and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. John Morrell & Company, Defendant. Lori Sokolowski, d/b/a Solo Pork, Individually, and on behalf of all others simila
District Court, D. Maryland · 2005-08-25 · Published · cited 47× · 384 F. Supp. 2d 845; 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18083; 2005 WL 2045800
384 F.Supp.2d 845 (2005) In re MUTUAL FUNDS INVESTMENT LITIGATION. (In re Janus SUBTRACK). No. MDL-1586. Civ. No. 04-MD-15863. United States District Court, D. Maryland. August 25, 2005. *846 *847 *848 *849 Christopher S. Hi
District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2010-07-01 · Published · cited 9× · 723 F. Supp. 2d 987; 2010 WL 2671306
723 F.Supp.2d 987 (2010) In re PACKAGED ICE ANTITRUST LITIGATION. Direct Purchasers Action. Case No. 08-MD-01952. United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division. July 1, 2010. *989 Joseph Marid Patane, Joseph M. Patane Assoc., San Francisco, CA, Lauren Clare Russell, Mario Nunzio Alioto Trump, Allioto, San Francisco,
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2020-03-23 · Published · cited 7× · 953 F.3d 760
Case: 18-2140 Document: 115 Page: 1 Filed: 03/23/2020 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ ARTHREX, INC., Appellant v. SMITH & NEPHEW, INC., ARTHROCARE CORP., Appellees UNITED STATES, Intervenor ______________________ 2018-2140
District Court, N.D. Indiana · 2010-04-21 · Published · cited 0× · 712 F. Supp. 2d 776; 16 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 135; 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 39738; 2010 WL 1652762
712 F.Supp.2d 776 (2010) In re FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYSTEM, INC., EMPLOYMENT PRACTICES LITIGATION. This Document Relates to: all Actions. Cause No. 3:05-MD-527 RM (MDL-1700). United States District Court, N.D. Indiana, South Bend Division. April 21, 2010. *781 Beth A. Ross, Eleanor I. Morton, Leonard Carder LLP, San Francisco, CA, Ly
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013-09-20 · Published · cited 145× · 730 F.3d 1142; 2013 WL 5289100
OPINION REINHARDT, Circuit Judge: Prior to 2008, “group homes”—i.e., homes in which recovering alcoholics and drug users live communally and mutually support each other’s recovery—were generally permitted to locate in residential zones in the City of Newport Beach (“the City”) and they did so freely. 1
Baer v. Chasepublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004-12-21 · Published · cited 0×
Opinions of the United 2004 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 12-21-2004 Baer v. Chase Precedential or Non-Precedentia
United States Court of Federal Claims · 2020-08-28 · Published · cited 0×
In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS Filed: July 28, 2020 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * MICHAEL PAVAN, next friend of * J.P., a minor, * PUBLISHED * Petitioner, * No. 14-60V * v. *
District Court, N.D. Indiana · 2009-07-27 · Published · cited 6× · 662 F. Supp. 2d 1069; 15 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 161; 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 65244; 2009 WL 2242231
662 F.Supp.2d 1069 (2009) In re FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYSTEM, INC., EMPLOYMENT PRACTICES LITIGATION. This Document Relates To: 3:05-CV-596 (Slayman—Oregon) 3:07cv120 (Nevada) 3:07cv272 (Arizona) 3:07cv322 (Connecticut) 3:07cv324 (Givens—FLSA) 3:07cv325 (Vargas—MCSA) 3:07cv326 (North Carolina) 3:07cv328 (Leighter—Oregon) 3:08cv336 (Ohio) 3:07cv411 (Georgia) 3:07cv412 (Vermont) 3:07cv478 (Colorado) 3:08cv193 (Boudreaux—Louisiana) 3:08c
District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2012-07-19 · Published · cited 86× · 880 F. Supp. 2d 801; 2012 WL 2953651; 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 100180
OPINION AND ORDER GREGORY L. FROST, District Judge. This matter is before the Court for consideration of Porsche Cars North America, Inc.’s Motion to Dismiss the Master Consolidated Amended Class Action Complaint Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) (ECF No. 62), Plaintiffs’ Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Defendant Porsche Cars North America, Inc.’s Motion to Dismiss the Master Consolidated Amend
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006-10-12 · Published · cited 4× · 36 A.D.3d 34; 822 N.Y.S.2d 871
OPINION OF THE COURT Per Curiam. Section 468-a of the Judiciary Law requires every resident *35and nonresident attorney admitted to practice in the State of New York to file a biennial registration statement with the administrative office of the courts. A biennial registration fee must be paid at the time the statement is filed. This registration state