Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “(PC) Carlson v. Duffy”
John Hugh Gilmore v. City of Minneapolispublic domain
BEAM, Circuit Judge, dissenting. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff John Hugh Gilmore is an attorney in Minnesota and a recognizable politi*839cally conservative blogger and author. On June 16, 2011, two separate conferences or meetings were being held simultaneously on Nicollet Mall in downtown Minneapolis. Gilmore attended
MEMORANDUM OPINION Marvin Isgur, UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY JUDGE Doyle and Margaret Hartman filed this adversary proceeding against Ultra Petroleum Corporation et al seeking to recover a percentage of Ultra’s gains attributable to its oil and gas hedging transactions. The Hartmans allege that hedging gains must be included within their net profits interest, which was created by the 1954 Pine-dale
In re Lubrizol Shareholders Litigationpublic domain
[Cite as In re Lubrizol Shareholders Litigation, 2017-Ohio-622.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT LAKE COUNTY, OHIO IN RE: LUBRIZOL : OPINION SHAREHOLDERS LITIGATION : CASE NO. 2016-L-026
705 F.Supp.2d 714 (2010) ASSOCIATED AUTOMOTIVE INC., Plaintiff, v. ACCEPTANCE INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant. Civil Action No. H-09-2374. United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Houston Division. March 31, 2010. *716 Patrick Kevin Leyendecker, Moriarty Leyendecker Erben PC, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff. George T. J
Colenburg v. Starcon International, Inc.public domain
656 F.Supp.2d 947 (2009) Taron COLENBURG, Plaintiff, v. STARCON INTERNATIONAL, INC., Defendant. Civ. No. 08-4683 (RHK/FLN). United States District Court, D. Minnesota. May 29, 2009. *952 Joni M. Thome, Clayton D. Halunen, Halunen & Associates, Minneapolis, MN, for Plaintiff. Kerry L. Middleton, Noah G. Lipschultz, Litt
Acceptance Indemnity Insurance v. Maltezpublic domain
(2007) ACCEPTANCE INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. Melvin Alfredo MALTEZ, Associated Automotive, Inc., Cal Enderli, Shirley Enderli, and Cal Enderli, Jr., Individually and d/b/a Associated Automotive Salvage, Defendants. Civil Action No. H-04-2222. United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Houston Division. August 28, 2007. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
Arthrex, Inc. v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.public domain
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ ARTHREX, INC., Appellant v. SMITH & NEPHEW, INC., ARTHROCARE CORP., Appellees UNITED STATES, Intervenor ______________________ 2018-2140 ______________________ Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office
OPINION AND ORDER Robert L. Miller, Jr., Judge Twenty proposed class actions in this multi-district litigation docket came before me on March 13-14 for fairness hearings. The cases are on limited remand from the court of appeals, where nineteen of them awaited resolution. The Judicial Panel on Multi-District Litigation centralized the cases under 28 U.S.C. § 1407, but the cases haven’t been consolidated,
Kinkaid v. John Morrell & Co.public domain
321 F.Supp.2d 1090 (2004) Scott KINKAID, Individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. JOHN MORRELL & COMPANY, Defendant. Alan Hoefling, Individually, and A & G Swine Enterprises, Inc., d/b/a Hoefling Hog Farms, and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. John Morrell & Company, Defendant. Lori Sokolowski, d/b/a Solo Pork, Individually, and on behalf of all others simila
In Re Mutual Funds Investment Litigationpublic domain
384 F.Supp.2d 845 (2005) In re MUTUAL FUNDS INVESTMENT LITIGATION. (In re Janus SUBTRACK). No. MDL-1586. Civ. No. 04-MD-15863. United States District Court, D. Maryland. August 25, 2005. *846 *847 *848 *849 Christopher S. Hi
In Re Packaged Ice Antitrust Litigationpublic domain
723 F.Supp.2d 987 (2010) In re PACKAGED ICE ANTITRUST LITIGATION. Direct Purchasers Action. Case No. 08-MD-01952. United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division. July 1, 2010. *989 Joseph Marid Patane, Joseph M. Patane Assoc., San Francisco, CA, Lauren Clare Russell, Mario Nunzio Alioto Trump, Allioto, San Francisco,
Arthrex, Inc. v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.public domain
Case: 18-2140 Document: 115 Page: 1 Filed: 03/23/2020 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ ARTHREX, INC., Appellant v. SMITH & NEPHEW, INC., ARTHROCARE CORP., Appellees UNITED STATES, Intervenor ______________________ 2018-2140
712 F.Supp.2d 776 (2010) In re FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYSTEM, INC., EMPLOYMENT PRACTICES LITIGATION. This Document Relates to: all Actions. Cause No. 3:05-MD-527 RM (MDL-1700). United States District Court, N.D. Indiana, South Bend Division. April 21, 2010. *781 Beth A. Ross, Eleanor I. Morton, Leonard Carder LLP, San Francisco, CA, Ly
OPINION REINHARDT, Circuit Judge: Prior to 2008, “group homes”—i.e., homes in which recovering alcoholics and drug users live communally and mutually support each other’s recovery—were generally permitted to locate in residential zones in the City of Newport Beach (“the City”) and they did so freely. 1
Baer v. Chasepublic domain
Opinions of the United 2004 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 12-21-2004 Baer v. Chase Precedential or Non-Precedentia
Pavan v. Secretary of Health and Human Servicespublic domain
In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS Filed: July 28, 2020 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * MICHAEL PAVAN, next friend of * J.P., a minor, * PUBLISHED * Petitioner, * No. 14-60V * v. *
662 F.Supp.2d 1069 (2009) In re FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYSTEM, INC., EMPLOYMENT PRACTICES LITIGATION. This Document Relates To: 3:05-CV-596 (SlaymanOregon) 3:07cv120 (Nevada) 3:07cv272 (Arizona) 3:07cv322 (Connecticut) 3:07cv324 (GivensFLSA) 3:07cv325 (VargasMCSA) 3:07cv326 (North Carolina) 3:07cv328 (LeighterOregon) 3:08cv336 (Ohio) 3:07cv411 (Georgia) 3:07cv412 (Vermont) 3:07cv478 (Colorado) 3:08cv193 (BoudreauxLouisiana) 3:08c
In re Porsche Cars North America, Inc.public domain
OPINION AND ORDER GREGORY L. FROST, District Judge. This matter is before the Court for consideration of Porsche Cars North America, Inc.’s Motion to Dismiss the Master Consolidated Amended Class Action Complaint Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) (ECF No. 62), Plaintiffs’ Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Defendant Porsche Cars North America, Inc.’s Motion to Dismiss the Master Consolidated Amend
OPINION OF THE COURT Per Curiam. Section 468-a of the Judiciary Law requires every resident *35and nonresident attorney admitted to practice in the State of New York to file a biennial registration statement with the administrative office of the courts. A biennial registration fee must be paid at the time the statement is filed. This registration state
ACCEPTED 15-25-00013-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/8/2025 12:26 PM No. 15-25-00013-CV