Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
9 opinions for “(PC) Broadnax v. State Controller's Office (CA)”
Duhn Oil Tool, Inc. v. Cooper Cameron Corp.public domain
818 F.Supp.2d 1193 (2011) DUHN OIL TOOL, INC., Plaintiff, v. COOPER CAMERON CORPORATION, Defendants. No. 1:05-cv-01411-OWW-GSA. United States District Court, E.D. California. September 30, 2011. *1197 Edward Richard Schwartz, Pasadena, CA, James M. Whitelaw, Joseph Edward Thomas, Kerri Ann Rich, William J. Kolegraff, Thomas White
Banford v. Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.public domain
Opinion and Order WILLIAM K. SESSIONS III, District Judge. Plaintiffs David Banford, Robert Miller, Gary Stratton and Scott McGratty brought this suit against Defendant Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. (“Entergy”). The Plaintiffs challenged their designation as exempt employees for purposes of overtime pay under the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA” or “the Act”) and a related state statute. Aft
Perrine v. E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.public domain
ALAN D. MOATS, Judge: This environmental class action is before this Court upon three separate appeals seeking review of a series of jury verdicts, orders, and rulings by the Circuit Court of Harrison County, West Virginia. In the underlying class action, E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company, a defendant below (hereinafter referred to as “DuPont”), was found to be liable to class members in the approximate amount of $381,737,5
Allen v. Scott (In re Scott)public domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION BENJAMIN COHEN, Bankruptcy Judge. The matters before the Court are: 1. The plaintiffs Complaint for non-dischargeability filed in this Court on January 7, 2006, A.P. Docket No. 1, incorporating the state court Complaint the plaintiff filed in the Circuit Court of Jefferson County, Alabama, Bessemer Division on December 22, 2005; and
In re Gen. Motors LLCpublic domain
[Regarding Application of the Court's Prior Rulings on Manifestation, Incidental Damages (Lost Time), and Unjust Enrichment to All Remaining Jurisdictions in Dispute (MDL Order No. 131 Issues) ] JESSE M. FURMAN, United States District Judge INTRODUCTION... 274 LEGAL STANDARDS... 275 DISCUSSION... 275 A. Manifestation... 276
Perrine v. EI DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND CO.public domain
694 S.E.2d 815 (2010) Lenora PERRINE; Carolyn Holbert; Waunona Messinger Crouser; Rebeccah Morlock; Anthony Beezel; Mary Montgomery; Mary Luzader; Truman R. Desist; Larry Beezel; and Joseph Bradshaw; individuals residing in West Virginia, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs below, Appellants in no. 34333, Appellees in nos. 34334 and 34335, v. E.I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY, a Delaware corporation doing busin
ACCEPTED 14-14-00345-CV FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 3/27/2015 5:02:41 P
ACCEPTED 15-25-00120-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 10/16/2025 11:54 AM No. 15-25-000120-CV CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE
Greer, David AKA David Duane Greerpublic domain
./ I-;:. LJ 0 This document contains some pages that are of poor quality at the time of imaging. RECEIVED IN 0 COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS NOV 30 2Ui5 n THE STATE OF TEXAS