Cases

PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT ____________ Nos. 20-2833 ____________ ESTATE OF JOSEPH MAGLIOLI; BERNARD MAGLIOLI; DANTE MAGLIOLI; ESTATE OF DALE PETRY; CHRISTOPHER PETRY v. ALLIANCE HC HOLDINGS LLC, d/b/a Andover Subacute & Rehabilitation I; ALLIANCE HC II LLC, d/b/a Andover Subacute & Rehabi

181 P.3d 727 (2008) 2008 OK CR 11 Luis Maurico OCHOA and Gregorio Robles, Petitioners v. The Honorable Jerry D. BASS and John Whetsel, Sheriff for Oklahoma County, Respondents. No. HC-2007-1120. Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma. March 12, 2008. *728 Joan L. Lopez, Oklahoma City, OK, Attorney for Defen

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE October 26, 2004 Session WILLIAM YELTON v. DAVID MILLS, WARDEN & STATE OF TENNESSEE Appeal from the Criminal Court for Morgan County No. 8839 E. Eugene Eblen, Judge No. E2004-00383-CCA-R3-HC - Filed February 11, 2005 In 1992, the petitioner, William T. Yelton,

739 F.Supp.2d 839 (2010) Abner Ray NICHOLSON, Petitioner, v. Gerald BRANKER, Warden, Central Prison, Raleigh, N.C., Respondent. No. 5:06-HC-2148-H. United States District Court, E.D. North Carolina, Western Division. September 20, 2010. *846 James B. Maxwell, Maxwell, Freeman & Bowman, P.A., Mark James Kleinschmidt, Fair Tria

245 S.W.3d 340 (2008) Randy L. MAY v. Howard W. CARLTON, Warden. Supreme Court of Tennessee, at Knoxville. September 6, 2007 Session. January 18, 2008. *341 Todd A. Shelton, Greeneville, Tennessee, for the appellant, Randy L. May. Robert E. Cooper, Jr., Attorney General and Reporter; Michael E. Moore, Solicitor General; an

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION [Doc. # 21] ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO ENTER JUDGMENT AND CLOSE CASE ORDER DECLINING TO ISSUE CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY LAWRENCE J. O’NEILL, District Judge. Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas co

637 F.Supp.2d 837 (2009) Brian THOMAS, Petitioner, v. James A. YATES, Respondent. No. 1:05-cv-01198-LJO-JMD-HC. United States District Court, E.D. California. June 17, 2009. *840 Marc E. Grossman, Law Offices of Marc E. Grossman, Upland, CA, for Petitioner. Maria G. Chan, California Attorney General's Office, Sacramento, C

(2008) Johnny J. CLOUGH, Petitioner, v. M.S. EVANS, Respondent. No. CV F 06-0903 DLB HC. United States District Court, E.D. California. May 9, 2008. ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS, DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO ENTER JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF RESPONDENT, AND DECLINING TO ISSUE CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY DENNIS L. BECK, United States Magistrate Ju

ORDER JAMES C. FOX, Senior District Judge. This matter arises from the petition for writ of habeas corpus (D.E. # 1), pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, filed by Thomas Moore, Jr. (“Moore” or “petitioner”). Petitioner is a state inmate under sentence for convictions on counts of first degree burglary and assault with a deadly weapon with intent to kill inflicting serious injury. Presently before the court are

444 F.3d 225 Marcus Reymond ROBINSON, Petitioner-Appellant,v.Marvin L. POLK, Warden, Central Prison, Raleigh, North Carolina, Respondent-Appellee.Michael William Lenz, Amicus Supporting Appellant. No. 05-1 (CA-00-127-5-F-HC). United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. April 7, 2006. Geoffrey Wuensch Hosfo

134 Nev., Advance Opinion 1 04 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA JAMES MARLIN COOPER, __No. 72091 Appellant, !TON D vs. F aTt THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.

134 Nev., Advance Opinion 1 04 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA JAMES MARLIN COOPER, __No. 72091 Appellant, !TON D vs. F aTt THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.

978 F.Supp. 242 (1997) Harvey Lee GREEN, Jr., Petitioner, v. James B. FRENCH, Warden, Central Prison, Raleigh, North Carolina, Respondent. No. 5:96-HC-676-BR. United States District Court, E.D. North Carolina, Western Division. July 16, 1997. *243 *244 *245

617 F.Supp. 633 (1985) Roger Lee McQUEEN, Petitioner, v. Samuel P. GARRISON, et al., Respondents. No. 82-675-HC. United States District Court, E.D. North Carolina, Raleigh Division. September 4, 1985. Douglas E. Canders, Fayetteville, N.C., for petitioner. Lacy H. Thornburg, Atty. Gen. by Richard N. League, Sp. Deputy Atty. Gen., Raleigh, N.C., for respondent

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT JANE DOE, on behalf of herself and No. 22-55315 all others similarly situated, D.C. No. 2:21-cv- Plaintiff-Appellant, 02428-VAP-SK v. ORDER AND AMENDED WEBGROUP CZECH REPUBLIC, OPINION A.S.; WGCZ HOLDING, A.S.; WGCZ LIMITED, S

619 F.Supp. 116 (1985) Roger Lee McQUEEN, Petitioner, v. Samuel P. GARRISON, et al., Respondents. No. 82-675-HC. United States District Court, E.D. North Carolina, Raleigh Division. April 11, 1985. *117 Douglas E. Canders, Fayetteville, N.C., for petitioner. Lacy H. Thornburg, Atty. Gen. of N.C. by Richard N. League, Sp. D

LILJEBERG, J. *824Defendant appeals his convictions and sentences for two counts of pandering. For the following reasons, we affirm. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY Defendant was charged by bill of information with two counts of pandering, in violation of La. R.S. 14:84. He was arraigned

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT JANE DOE, on behalf of herself and No. 22-55315 all others similarly situated, D.C. No. 2:21-cv- Plaintiff-Appellant, 02428-VAP-SK v. OPINION WEBGROUP CZECH REPUBLIC, A.S.; WGCZ HOLDING, A.S.; WGCZ LIMITED, S.R.O.; NKL ASSOCIATES, S.R.O.; TRAFFIC F, S.R.O.; GTFLIX TV, S.R.O.; FTCP, S

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA No. 22–0892 Submitted December 14, 2023—Filed February 23, 2024 STATE OF IOWA, Appellee, vs. SYDNEY LEIANN SLAUGHTER, Appellant. On review from the Iowa Court of Appeals. Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Black Hawk County, Kellyann M. Lekar, Judge. The State seeks further review of a court of appeals decision reversing the defendant’s conviction for g

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS; DENYING CERTIFICATE OF AP-PEALABILITY RONALD M. WHYTE, District Judge Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The court ordered respondent to show cause why the petition should not be granted. Respondent has filed an answer addressing the merits of the petition,