⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

13 opinions for “(HC) Neal-Anderson v. People of California”

Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 2010-10-29 · Published · cited 0× · 325 S.W.3d 904; 2010 Ky. App. LEXIS 207; 2010 WL 4290068
OPINION THOMPSON, Judge: J. Hilton Brooks, III, M.D., dissented from a November 30, 2004, merger of Brooks Furniture Mfgrs., Inc., a closely-held family corporation, into BFI Inc., a Tennessee corporation, and demanded payment for his shares. After the issue regarding Hilton’s demand for payment remained unresolved, Brooks Furniture petitioned the Bell Circuit Court to determine the fair value
Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2025-03-21 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA No. 86PA24 Filed 21 March 2025 EMILY HAPPEL, individually, TANNER SMITH, a minor, and EMILY HAPPEL on behalf of TANNER SMITH as his mother v. GUILFORD COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION and OLD NORTH STATE MEDICAL SOCIETY, INC. On discretionary appeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 of a unanimous decision of the Court of Appeals, 292 N.C. App. 563, 899 S.E
Jensen v. Hernandezpublic domain
District Court, E.D. California · 2012-03-30 · Published · cited 8× · 864 F. Supp. 2d 869; 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 45673; 2012 WL 1130599
ORDER DALE A. DROZD, United States Magistrate Judge: Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The parties have consented to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). Petitioner challenges a judgment of conviction entered against him on December 17, 2003 in the Sacramento County S
United States Court of Federal Claims · 2022-03-17 · Published · cited 0×
Sn the Anited States Court of Federal Clauns Nos. 15-885C, 16-925C (Reissued: March 17, 2022)! MM Re eK Contract Disputes Act; Construction; Type I Differing Site Condition; Type II Differing Site Condition; Defective Specifications; NOVA GROUP/TUTOR-SALIBA, A Joint Venture, Design Specifications; Suspension of Critical Path Work; Excusable Delay; Constructive Acceleration; Damages; Overtime; Lost Productivity; Modified Total Cost Approach; Equipment Expense; Reopening the Record to Admit an
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · 2015-07-20 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 03-15-00280-CV 6142048 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS
Court of Appeals of Texas · 2015-07-13 · Published · cited 0×
!, § (;OF 1 1111)11»'161)`011 101 1110 C[ 51\)
in Re: Bryan Rowespublic domain
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas) · 2015-12-17 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 05-15-01533-CV 05-15-01533-CV FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS DALLAS, TEXAS 12/17/2015 10:17:26 AM
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston) · 2015-02-20 · Published · cited 0×
C,¢§¢NO°‘L'+.'LZ>»QQ%¢W-LR , ` mpzq . wm D\s'rmm”. um FAm/ALS :FEB.ZOZMS RDUS’I'OH ,TE/Xk.é' ` 2 c'HR\sToPHEH A.PmNE . CLERK ’WROMLBEN;Y APPF,L\_A\~\‘Y V ’\’m,§'r¢Tms 4 n - APPLLLLE, ' ONMM;\,V\HNM:L;KU§§/No. 10 l‘l bZ‘+ FP\ome, l 901'“ GumclAL ' Dls*rmrfl Cc)um OF lé¥m_m's CouM/N,TE).<15 Lz_ DP Com mm 1b€,m\‘r\€.s [)FPKpct,Lz,s wm Counss_\
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · 2015-07-14 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 03-14-00518-CV 6061835 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS